dagblog - Comments for "The Architect Jeanne Gang on Winning a MacArthur Fellowship" http://dagblog.com/link/architect-jeanne-gang-winning-macarthur-fellowship-11720 Comments for "The Architect Jeanne Gang on Winning a MacArthur Fellowship" en "And the RIBA knows how to http://dagblog.com/comment/136063#comment-136063 <a id="comment-136063"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/136049#comment-136049">Donal, just in case ya didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"And the RIBA knows how to throw a party." Ha!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:57:42 +0000 Donal comment 136063 at http://dagblog.com Donal, just in case ya didn't http://dagblog.com/comment/136049#comment-136049 <a id="comment-136049"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135434#comment-135434">I was dubious about the style</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Donal, just in case ya didn't know--</p> <p>Over in the UK the two camps are apparently at each others' throats over the Stirling Prize:</p> <p><a href="http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/reaction-to-hadids-stirling-prize-win-there-was-a-collective-groan/8620620.article">http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/reaction-to-hadids-stirling-prize-win...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:42:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 136049 at http://dagblog.com I'm glad you provided the http://dagblog.com/comment/135448#comment-135448 <a id="comment-135448"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135428#comment-135428">It&#039;s cool that they did an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm glad you  provided the complete listing, so I can quit harassing the mail people, who I was sure had lost my award in the mail...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:24:57 +0000 jollyroger comment 135448 at http://dagblog.com I was dubious about the style http://dagblog.com/comment/135434#comment-135434 <a id="comment-135434"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/135428#comment-135428">It&#039;s cool that they did an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was dubious about the style component of high-style architecture in college. I saw too many projects praised that ignored the program but looked like the stuff in the magazines. Though I don't use that term, I'd probably be in the anti-art-chitecture camp myself.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:04:12 +0000 Donal comment 135434 at http://dagblog.com It's cool that they did an http://dagblog.com/comment/135428#comment-135428 <a id="comment-135428"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/architect-jeanne-gang-winning-macarthur-fellowship-11720">The Architect Jeanne Gang on Winning a MacArthur Fellowship</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's cool that they did an architect this time, but it goes beyond that.</p> <p>I did some surfing the other day, catching up on the intellectual world brouhaha raised by the Times picking Michael Kimmelman to replace Ouroussoff, and the history of that whole thing, including Ourossoff vs. Saints Muschamp and Huxtable, and the opining that this whole Kimmelman thing was just going further downhill. And how important the Times' critic post is as p.r. for the profession to the public, which is why this is such an important thing, yadda yadda.</p> <p>And then Kimmelman, contrary to dire predictions of many who expected another art-chitecture critic, decided to start with--how should I say it?--function over form, or architecture over art-chitecture. I kinda got a real kick out of that, because it betrayed some old classic prejudices of architecture people towards fine art people, as if a fine art critic is necessarily going to make an effete art-chitecture critic.</p> <p>Well this MacArthur prize is sort of a wise one in that context, isn't it? It goes both ways!</p> <p>But actually, my favorite <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/arts/macarthur-foundation-announces-winners-of-genius-awards.html">MacArthur prize this year</a> was this one:</p> <blockquote> <p>....Jad Abumrad, 38, the co-host and producer of “Radiolab,” a program on WNYC in New York that explores questions of science and philosophy, like the nature of altruism.</p> <p>“This show is the central creative mission of my life right now, and the money might give me the space to bring new things into it,” Mr. Abumrad said...</p> </blockquote> <p>For purely selfish reasons--I just adore his show, my favorite thing on NPR.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:26:39 +0000 artappraiser comment 135428 at http://dagblog.com