dagblog - Comments for "&quot;Dear 1%...&quot; Does there need to be more?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/dear-1-does-there-need-be-more-11851 Comments for ""Dear 1%..." Does there need to be more?" en I think you're right. http://dagblog.com/comment/137153#comment-137153 <a id="comment-137153"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137109#comment-137109">I was not frustrated about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you're right.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:22:48 +0000 erica20 comment 137153 at http://dagblog.com It already was--they called http://dagblog.com/comment/137151#comment-137151 <a id="comment-137151"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137093#comment-137093">It&#039;s going to be Republican</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It already was--they called it the Tea Party, and Democrats are just lucky that the Republicans screwed it up so badly....</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:08:05 +0000 erica20 comment 137151 at http://dagblog.com Restoring that prosperity http://dagblog.com/comment/137133#comment-137133 <a id="comment-137133"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137073#comment-137073">comparing the general</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Restoring that prosperity trajectory will require some serious redistribution, because the fundamental cause of the collapse is decades of a widening income gap, which first buried people under debt, and then finally led to a meltdown of the purchasing power of ordinary Americans.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:15:26 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 137133 at http://dagblog.com There are obviously no http://dagblog.com/comment/137123#comment-137123 <a id="comment-137123"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137079#comment-137079">When do they have the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There are obviously no "independent" primaries, but there are Green primaries, Constitution Party primaries, etc. Of course, if we want to have successful third parties… (you know where I'm going with that)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:48:00 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 137123 at http://dagblog.com I was not frustrated about http://dagblog.com/comment/137109#comment-137109 <a id="comment-137109"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/dear-1-does-there-need-be-more-11851">&quot;Dear 1%...&quot; Does there need to be more?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was not frustrated about trying to get 2/3 majority to agree on vision, mission, and goals because we weren't even voting that night.  I was frustrated because the facilitator did not seem to understand the distinction and why one comes before another and she had us talking about them all at once. </p> <p>I really hope that the Occupy movement never releases any 'demands'.  I think that idea was generated from the media and I hope they don't play into it.  It feels much more powerful to choose vision, mission, and goals and move forward and let the politicians and the wealthy try to stop us or persuade us to accept less than what we have decided to accomplish.</p> <p>This is going to take patience and persistence.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:31:03 +0000 synchronicity comment 137109 at http://dagblog.com How do you like that? It took http://dagblog.com/comment/137106#comment-137106 <a id="comment-137106"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137076#comment-137076">we are poor but honest</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How do you like that?</p> <p>It took me two hours....two frickin hours to properly respond to this. hahahahaha</p> <p> </p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/idbsjXtSFLU" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:17:05 +0000 Richard Day comment 137106 at http://dagblog.com It's going to be Republican http://dagblog.com/comment/137093#comment-137093 <a id="comment-137093"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137080#comment-137080">The moment to know when it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's going to be Republican candidates who do it before the clueless and slow-witted no-drama Obama gets around to it.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:39:54 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 137093 at http://dagblog.com Re: Money, Power and http://dagblog.com/comment/137092#comment-137092 <a id="comment-137092"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/dear-1-does-there-need-be-more-11851">&quot;Dear 1%...&quot; Does there need to be more?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>Re: Money, Power and Political Influence</p> <p> </p> <p>Dear 1%,<br /><br /> You've taken too much.  Put some of it back.</p> <p> </p> <p>Sincerely, </p> <p> </p> <p>The 99%</p> <p> </p> <p>P.S.  Do it now and avoid us having to be-head you later.</p> <p> </p> <p>---------------------</p> <p> </p> <p><em>That's as simple as I can make it.</em></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:36:47 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 137092 at http://dagblog.com Gee, I was just going to say http://dagblog.com/comment/137089#comment-137089 <a id="comment-137089"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137061#comment-137061">It becomes difficult going</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gee, I was just going to say "baby steps," because for a lot of the 99% it IS about money, or at least about making a living. So it's a little early for "Occupy Capitalism," even if Trope wishes for more...</p> <p>Different people in the 99% have different priorities, but I'd say that since the group is called Occupy Wall Street, there's something there about asking for more fairness in the way the money is made. The 99% would be more likely to sign onto that...</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:02:53 +0000 erica20 comment 137089 at http://dagblog.com The moment to know when it http://dagblog.com/comment/137080#comment-137080 <a id="comment-137080"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137075#comment-137075">The 99% concept is brilliant.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The moment to know when it has arrived is when some politician in an election race goes to the mic and says "I'm a 99%."  The moment to know when the movement has power when said politician unseats an incumbent - primary or, dare one say, a general election.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:26:42 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 137080 at http://dagblog.com