dagblog - Comments for "Obama&#039;s new best friends: SuperCommittee and Bush Tax Cuts." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obamas-new-best-friends-supercommittee-and-bush-tax-cuts-11854 Comments for "Obama's new best friends: SuperCommittee and Bush Tax Cuts." en But I'm o.k. with the http://dagblog.com/comment/137219#comment-137219 <a id="comment-137219"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137211#comment-137211">If the 99% return in the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">But I'm o.k. with the Occupiers going South for the Winter. </span></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:26:11 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137219 at http://dagblog.com If the 99% return in the http://dagblog.com/comment/137211#comment-137211 <a id="comment-137211"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137202#comment-137202">I agree with Rootman. In my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>If the 99% return in the spring with their occupations...</p> </blockquote> <p>I don't know if they are going to leave in the winter!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:11:07 +0000 Rootman comment 137211 at http://dagblog.com I agree with Rootman. In my http://dagblog.com/comment/137202#comment-137202 <a id="comment-137202"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137188#comment-137188">Root, thanks for your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I agree with Rootman. In my house district a very good Democrat candidate has announced his run against the Republican incumbent. I have not seen that in several elections. Florida's Democratic Senator will be reelected because he is very popular. A lot can happen in the next year. If the 99% return in the spring with their occupations and marches that could help Democrats. It has gotten people to focus on the lack of fairness.</div></div></div> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:58:23 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 137202 at http://dagblog.com Root, thanks for your http://dagblog.com/comment/137188#comment-137188 <a id="comment-137188"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137186#comment-137186">I just don&#039;t see any scenario</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Root, thanks for your comment. I hope you're right. I'm just not that confident. And I am worried about losing the entire Congress--which is why I want Obama to win with a margin large enough to help prevent that.   </span></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:57:58 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137188 at http://dagblog.com I just don't see any scenario http://dagblog.com/comment/137186#comment-137186 <a id="comment-137186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obamas-new-best-friends-supercommittee-and-bush-tax-cuts-11854">Obama&#039;s new best friends: SuperCommittee and Bush Tax Cuts.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just don't see any scenario where Obama loses. The whole Republican case is self-contradictory. You can't run very long on unadulterated bullshit.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:15:06 +0000 Rootman comment 137186 at http://dagblog.com Most Americans 'support' http://dagblog.com/comment/137169#comment-137169 <a id="comment-137169"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137146#comment-137146">I disagree. Most Americans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Most Americans 'support' raising taxes on the wealthy, but you can't run 'primarily' on that is what I said. Maybe Catholic Bishops will urge their flocks to go out and vote for candidates who pledge to raise taxes on millionaires someday. Right now as a 'wedge issue' its pretty low on the list.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:40:09 +0000 NCD comment 137169 at http://dagblog.com Another issue is how Obama http://dagblog.com/comment/137157#comment-137157 <a id="comment-137157"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obamas-new-best-friends-supercommittee-and-bush-tax-cuts-11854">Obama&#039;s new best friends: SuperCommittee and Bush Tax Cuts.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Another issue is how Obama runs compared to how Congressional Democrats run. If Obama isn't running against the "Tea Party", does that eliminate the option for legislators. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">I suppose if Obama runs against a "do nothing Congress", he would paint Romney with that color.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">"You have here in Governor Romney a man who is not running to be President of the people. He is running to be head of the "do nothing", "obstructionist" Republican party." Is that what the American people want? The head of a failed political party instead of a President? Does Governor Romney even understand the devastation brought upon this country by extremist Republicans taking the country hostage in a deficit debate, refusing to agree on things they themselves first proposed, and failing to pass any meaningful legislation to help those who are hurting and out of work?" </span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:51:11 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137157 at http://dagblog.com Thanks Donal. I don't think http://dagblog.com/comment/137156#comment-137156 <a id="comment-137156"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137155#comment-137155">[In the Guardian, Ana Marie</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks Donal. I don't think Perry can be counted completely out--who knows about outlier events and sudden revelations. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Aside from Perry, I can't see the religious right just rolling over on all this. I think Santorum has an outside chance if he really attacks Cain's 999 plan and goes after Romney. This guy is brash, as he showed in the take a vote from the audience last night--which worked beautifully.  </span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:40:29 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137156 at http://dagblog.com [In the Guardian, Ana Marie http://dagblog.com/comment/137155#comment-137155 <a id="comment-137155"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obamas-new-best-friends-supercommittee-and-bush-tax-cuts-11854">Obama&#039;s new best friends: SuperCommittee and Bush Tax Cuts.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>[In the Guardian, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/ana-marie-cox-blog/2011/oct/12/republican-presidential-economics-debate">Ana Marie Cox sez</a>] ... let's run the numbers: Romney still can't get above 25% in a national of poll of Republican voters, Perry has raised $17m (Cain has pulled in about $4m over the last two quarters), and only 27% of Americans overall can name Romney as candidate. As for the great battles of the 1500s, one of my Twitter friends summed it up nicely: It's "not like we haven't elected an inarticulate Texan before".<br /><br /> All this is to say that Perry can't be counted out and people are still hesitant about Romney – a hesitancy that any other candidate can exploit.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:29:03 +0000 Donal comment 137155 at http://dagblog.com I like that comparison. Just http://dagblog.com/comment/137152#comment-137152 <a id="comment-137152"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137149#comment-137149">Yes, it will be interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">I like that comparison.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Just saw a Rasmussen poll in which was Obama up by 14 points over Perry in a general election.  Romney down by 2. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Has there ever been a case in which the challenger in a primary was so effing bad that he even pulled down the overall numbers of the front runner?</span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:14:54 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137152 at http://dagblog.com