dagblog - Comments for "Cain&#039;s 999 plan vs. Perry&#039;s &quot;drill baby drill&quot;" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/999-plan-vs-drill-baby-drill-11875 Comments for "Cain's 999 plan vs. Perry's "drill baby drill"" en Thanks, Donal. It's hard to http://dagblog.com/comment/137660#comment-137660 <a id="comment-137660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137647#comment-137647">Via Bob Cesca and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Thanks, Donal. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">It's hard to know what to make of it. Stupidity would be one conclusion. The other is that the bottom half is being vilified as a form of offense on Obama's tax increases. So the bottom half paying more taxes is just fine. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">It has also come out that Cain has close ties to the Koch bros. through the pac Americans for Prosperity and has spent a great deal of time as a motivational speaker. I think it's possible that Cain's bounce might have been related to the databases that the Koch bros. have. </span></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:50:00 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137660 at http://dagblog.com Via Bob Cesca and http://dagblog.com/comment/137647#comment-137647 <a id="comment-137647"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/999-plan-vs-drill-baby-drill-11875">Cain&#039;s 999 plan vs. Perry&#039;s &quot;drill baby drill&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Via Bob Cesca and ThinkProgress, Herman Cain on Press the Meet:</p> <blockquote> <p>CAIN: There is a huge amount of public support for 999. Just talk to anybody. This is what’s going to help us get it passed. The public support.</p> <p>GREGORY: I just want to break that down. So you’re acknowledging this morning, which I haven’t heard you do before, that there are individuals who are going to pay more in taxes.</p> <p>CAIN: There are some, yes.</p> <p>GREGORY: And you think those people are going to rally around tax reform where the wealthy pay less and middle-class and lower-income folks pay more.</p> <p>CAIN: Yes.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:09:16 +0000 Donal comment 137647 at http://dagblog.com As Genghis has just alluded http://dagblog.com/comment/137462#comment-137462 <a id="comment-137462"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137461#comment-137461">In a Clarus Research poll</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">As Genghis has just alluded to in Dagblog's banner line the site's wall to wall coverage on Romney, I should suggest the thought here that all of the above really might have more significance to, especially when you take out 15 or 20 percent allocated to Paul and outliers, how a path is created for Romney than to anything else.  </span></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:31:20 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137462 at http://dagblog.com In a Clarus Research poll http://dagblog.com/comment/137461#comment-137461 <a id="comment-137461"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/999-plan-vs-drill-baby-drill-11875">Cain&#039;s 999 plan vs. Perry&#039;s &quot;drill baby drill&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">In a Clarus Research poll released yesterday Perry, Cain and Romney line up 23,21, and 17 respectively. Perry got more tea partiers than Cain.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Doth Perriwinkle's southern comfort indicate intoxication </span><span style="font-size: 14px"> which could spread to Iowa, S.C., etc?</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">And how about the near perfect three way split? </span></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:16:55 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137461 at http://dagblog.com Can Herman Cain's 999 Plan http://dagblog.com/comment/137439#comment-137439 <a id="comment-137439"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137434#comment-137434">Or a 99% tax on the top 1%.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><h1 class="contentheading"> Can Herman Cain's 999 Plan Work?</h1> <p> </p> <table border="2" cellspacing="0" style="border-bottom: #000000 2px solid; border-left: #000000 2px solid; background-color: #cfc4a0; width: 532px; height: 104px; border-top: #000000 2px solid; border-right: #000000 2px solid"><colgroup><col width="204" /><col width="124" /><col width="51" /><col width="125" /></colgroup><tbody><tr><td align="left" height="18" width="204"> 9% Growth Projection</td> <td align="left" width="124">  </td> <td align="left" width="51">  </td> <td align="left" width="125">  </td> </tr><tr><td align="left" height="19"> Personal Income</td> <td align="right"> $14,887,013,217</td> <td align="right"> 0.09</td> <td align="right"> $1,339,831,190</td> </tr><tr><td align="left" height="18"> Corporate before Tax Income</td> <td align="right"> 3564300000</td> <td align="right"> 0.09</td> <td align="right"> $320,787,000</td> </tr><tr><td align="left" height="18"> Gross Consumer Purchases</td> <td align="right"> 4990020000</td> <td align="right"> 0.09</td> <td align="right"> $449,101,800</td> </tr><tr><td align="left" height="18">  </td> <td align="left">  </td> <td align="left">  </td> <td align="right"> $2,109,719,990</td> </tr></tbody></table><p><a href="http://axdwhiteman.info/index.php/component/content/article/102-can-herman-cains-999-plan-work">http://axdwhiteman.info/index.php/component/content/article/102-can-herman-cains-999-plan-work</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:09:17 +0000 Resistance comment 137439 at http://dagblog.com A + B + C = D 0% + 0% http://dagblog.com/comment/137436#comment-137436 <a id="comment-137436"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137434#comment-137434">Or a 99% tax on the top 1%.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A   +   B   + C  = D</p> <p>0% + 0% + C  = D</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:58:35 +0000 Resistance comment 137436 at http://dagblog.com Or a 99% tax on the top 1%. http://dagblog.com/comment/137434#comment-137434 <a id="comment-137434"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137431#comment-137431">It&#039;s a conversation starter</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">Or a 99% tax on the top 1%. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Or a 1% tax on the bottom 99%</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">The 9% plan was pulled out of the air, there's absolutely no research on it.</span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:53:06 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137434 at http://dagblog.com It's a conversation starter http://dagblog.com/comment/137431#comment-137431 <a id="comment-137431"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/999-plan-vs-drill-baby-drill-11875">Cain&#039;s 999 plan vs. Perry&#039;s &quot;drill baby drill&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's a conversation starter though</p> <p>- 9% income tax,<br /> - 9% national sales tax, and<br /> - 9% corporate income tax</p> <p>9 + 9 + 9 = 27</p> <p>0 + 0 + 27 = 27</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:47:26 +0000 Resistance comment 137431 at http://dagblog.com I like that idea. Probably http://dagblog.com/comment/137433#comment-137433 <a id="comment-137433"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/137422#comment-137422">I am for a 9 approach! How</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">I like that idea. Probably ninety cents a trade would pay down the deficit. Or a 9% solution up Joe the Plumbers rear end might solve political gridlock. (just sounded like a good idea).</span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:47:14 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 137433 at http://dagblog.com I am for a 9 approach! How http://dagblog.com/comment/137422#comment-137422 <a id="comment-137422"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/999-plan-vs-drill-baby-drill-11875">Cain&#039;s 999 plan vs. Perry&#039;s &quot;drill baby drill&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am for a 9 approach!</p> <p>How about a 9% tax on all transfers of stock! That would include shares sold on the market; shares sold in the form of bonuses and shares used as collateral on loans.</p> <p>I think this would PAY FOR EVERYTHING. hahahahahah</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:45:39 +0000 Richard Day comment 137422 at http://dagblog.com