dagblog - Comments for "LENO &amp; OBAMA; WHO&#039;D A THUNK?" http://dagblog.com/arts/leno-obama-whod-thunk-12010 Comments for "LENO & OBAMA; WHO'D A THUNK?" en And yours was a great and http://dagblog.com/comment/138723#comment-138723 <a id="comment-138723"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138722#comment-138722">That is what I said. That is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And yours was a great and interesting point, political-analysis-wise, whatever the reader's own political preferences.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:15:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 138723 at http://dagblog.com That is what I said. That is http://dagblog.com/comment/138722#comment-138722 <a id="comment-138722"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138706#comment-138706">I think you might be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That is what I said.</p> <p>That is what my conclusion after watching these two men for two decades--Letterman longer of course.</p> <p>I just wanted to take the opportunity once again to underline the importance of this Leno interview with out CIC. I really feel it bolstered Obama's prestige. And I felt that immediately upon hearing the audience's reaction.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:10:38 +0000 Richard Day comment 138722 at http://dagblog.com I think you might be http://dagblog.com/comment/138706#comment-138706 <a id="comment-138706"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138643#comment-138643">Why I&#039;m shocked, I tell you,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you might be confusing me with with Deciduous aka Decader aka Desidero <a href="https://dagblog.com/link/jennifer-aniston-lists-beverly-hills-home-42-million-9032#comment-107073">aka defender of wealthy Hollywood celebs.</a> I wasn't defending Leno, I was pointing out his self-identification. And supposedly you don't like me because I don't defend liberals, remember? <img alt="devil" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/devil_smile.gif" title="devil" width="20" /></p> <p>Not that it matters, but I will add that Leno's style of humor doesn't piss me off but it does bore me to tears, I prefer Letterman. But my comment on the difference with Letterman was not about me, it as basically in agreement with Richard's statement thatĀ  <em>the audience, Leno's audience, is distinctly different from Letterman's audience.</em></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:40:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 138706 at http://dagblog.com Why I'm shocked, I tell you, http://dagblog.com/comment/138643#comment-138643 <a id="comment-138643"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138631#comment-138631">But &quot;Q&quot; would never ever</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why I'm shocked, I tell you, <em>shocked, </em>that we would see ArtAppraiserĀ coming to the defense of Jay Leno and the oppressed 1%.</p> <p>Oh wait.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:24:23 +0000 Anonymous comment 138643 at http://dagblog.com But "Q" would never ever http://dagblog.com/comment/138631#comment-138631 <a id="comment-138631"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138628#comment-138628">Fuck Leno anyway. - Q I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But "Q" would never ever attack a member of the liberal/progressive tribe; you must be an impostor. <img alt="devil" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/devil_smile.gif" title="devil" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:17:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 138631 at http://dagblog.com HAHAHAHA! Oh what a wonderful http://dagblog.com/comment/138630#comment-138630 <a id="comment-138630"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138628#comment-138628">Fuck Leno anyway. - Q I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>HAHAHAHA!</p> <p>Oh what a wonderful autumnal sentiment!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:14:27 +0000 Richard Day comment 138630 at http://dagblog.com Fuck Leno anyway. - Q I http://dagblog.com/comment/138628#comment-138628 <a id="comment-138628"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts/leno-obama-whod-thunk-12010">LENO &amp; OBAMA; WHO&#039;D A THUNK?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Fuck Leno anyway. - Q I don't need no stinking reason.</div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:03:52 +0000 Anonymous comment 138628 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/138621#comment-138621 <a id="comment-138621"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138620#comment-138620">That&#039;s our new doubletalk</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="laugh" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/teeth_smile.gif" title="laugh" width="20" /><img alt="laugh" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/teeth_smile.gif" title="laugh" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:03:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 138621 at http://dagblog.com That's our new doubletalk http://dagblog.com/comment/138620#comment-138620 <a id="comment-138620"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138613#comment-138613">Genghis, I just had a strange</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's our new doubletalk feature ...</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:36:39 +0000 Donal comment 138620 at http://dagblog.com Genghis, I just had a strange http://dagblog.com/comment/138613#comment-138613 <a id="comment-138613"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138603#comment-138603">And we&#039;re back! Sorry for the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Genghis, I just had a strange thing happen, no big deal for me, but just reporting it in case it's a clue to a problem developing. When I went to post a comment on this old thread</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/libya-news-thread-9730">http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/libya-news-thread-9730</a></p> <p>the reply box menu wouldn't load right away, so I clicked "switch to plain text" and then "switch to rich text" <em>and I ended up with 2 fully loaded reply boxes open</em>, one above the other. Nothing unusual happened when I hit "save"on the first box, though.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:54:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 138613 at http://dagblog.com