dagblog - Comments for "Is Rick Santorum ‘the next flavor of the month?’" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/rick-santorum-next-flavor-month-12030 Comments for "Is Rick Santorum ‘the next flavor of the month?’" en So you're admitting you http://dagblog.com/comment/138894#comment-138894 <a id="comment-138894"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138756#comment-138756">The Republicans are so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So you're admitting you operate from within a self-enforced bubble? Interesting.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:58:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 138894 at http://dagblog.com Hahaha! http://dagblog.com/comment/138808#comment-138808 <a id="comment-138808"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138762#comment-138762">Santorum reminds me of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hahaha!</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:29:42 +0000 MuddyPolitics comment 138808 at http://dagblog.com Santorum reminds me of http://dagblog.com/comment/138762#comment-138762 <a id="comment-138762"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/rick-santorum-next-flavor-month-12030">Is Rick Santorum ‘the next flavor of the month?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Santorum reminds me of someone I met 43 or 44 years ago.</p> <p>I would attend catechism because I thought it was the right thing to do. I was the only one still going to church in my broken family.</p> <p>The church was about a mile away.</p> <p>So the new catechism season began in September like school. And this middle aged man came in to tutor us in the majesty of the Roman Catholic Church.</p> <p>Now you have to remember that I am about 13 so the lecturer was probably 30 but to me that would have been middle aged.</p> <p>Anyhow, this idiot would talk about the evils of sex for a full hour. He would rant on and on about masturbation and extra marital sex and premarital sex and Sodom and Gommorah and God's wrath and....</p> <p>Since I was 13, I was constantly hiding a woody and thinking about Marilyn's chest and stuff like that. And this guy really got on my nerves.</p> <p>Well, about the third week of this I had had enough but found myself in my last catechism class anyway.</p> <p>In walks this woman, so pregnant I had fears that she would break water at any moment.</p> <p>It turns out that she is the wife of this pervert and is sitting in for him.</p> <p>I had this laughing fit. Uncontrollably i could not stop laughing and just walked out of my last catechism class--the last bit of religious propaganda mongering I would ever experience.</p> <p>the end</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 06:23:27 +0000 Richard Day comment 138762 at http://dagblog.com The Republicans are so http://dagblog.com/comment/138756#comment-138756 <a id="comment-138756"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/rick-santorum-next-flavor-month-12030">Is Rick Santorum ‘the next flavor of the month?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Republicans are so boring.  How can you spend so much time watching them?  I suspect every hour of viewing Republican gibberish is literally harmful to your brain health and intellectual capacity.  Just turn them off.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:03:30 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 138756 at http://dagblog.com A lot of the Tea Party http://dagblog.com/comment/138755#comment-138755 <a id="comment-138755"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/138748#comment-138748">I think you&#039;re right on the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A lot of the Tea Party doesn't really like the evangelicals and cultural conservatives.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:59:01 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 138755 at http://dagblog.com I think you're right on the http://dagblog.com/comment/138748#comment-138748 <a id="comment-138748"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/rick-santorum-next-flavor-month-12030">Is Rick Santorum ‘the next flavor of the month?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 14px">I think you're right on the point that he is an "angry homophobe"--and it may prove that even the angry religious tea partiers have their limit. Two things he has going for him is that he doesn't flip-flop and he is brash---and I thought the baggers would go for him. Perhaps he is just unlikable (doesn't that have another "e" in it?)</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 14px">Well, as they say, <em>its</em> no skin off my nose. </span><span style="font-size: 14px"> </span></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:42:38 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 138748 at http://dagblog.com