dagblog - Comments for "Poverty Amid Plenty – America’s Continuing Shame" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/poverty-amid-plenty-america-s-continuing-shame-12054 Comments for "Poverty Amid Plenty – America’s Continuing Shame" en On Monday, the Census Bureau http://dagblog.com/comment/139616#comment-139616 <a id="comment-139616"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/poverty-amid-plenty-america-s-continuing-shame-12054">Poverty Amid Plenty – America’s Continuing Shame</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/us/experts-say-bleak-account-of-poverty-missed-the-mark.html?ref=todayspaper">On Monday, the Census Bureau will release a long-promised alternate measure meant to do a better job of counting the resources of the needy and bills they have to pay....<em>New</em><em> York Times</em>, page A1, November 4, 2011.</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:01:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 139616 at http://dagblog.com Wait a minute. I thought http://dagblog.com/comment/139172#comment-139172 <a id="comment-139172"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139114#comment-139114">Cynicism also, among poverty,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wait a minute.  I thought only Democratic mayors taking their marching orders from Herr Obama were trying to disperse the OWS protests.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:12:10 +0000 Ethanator comment 139172 at http://dagblog.com No I wouldn't identify with http://dagblog.com/comment/139170#comment-139170 <a id="comment-139170"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139165#comment-139165">Wondering, the Trope, would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No I wouldn't identify with them.  For the record, there was nothing in what you linked to indicate that they sending in the unsavory types from the 99% in order to "smash heads." In fact, as the story relate it they are taking a hands off approach and not intervening one way or another, instead letting the protesters deal with those who are acting badly. </p> <blockquote> <p>The police, whom many occupiers see as the enemy and who work under a mayor who’s made no secret of his distaste for the occupiers, have little reason to help them maintain order, and rarely seem to have entered the park over the last week for anything short of an assault. When officers have gone in, a wave of people carrying drugs (or with other reasons to fear arrest) moves away from them while others circle tightly around, cameras out. Even when organizers have requested their intervention, police enter to a mixed chorus of “brutality” and “pig” calls side by side with chanted reminders that “you are the 99%.”</p> </blockquote> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> What I would put out there is that there are bad cops acting badly and good cops who do their best to perform their jobs.  It is the latter with whom I would identify, just as I would identify with anyone attempting to protest in what I believe is an appropriate manner.  The bad cops need to suffer appropriate consequences. (and if there is a policy in place about purposively sending folks to the site in order to facilitate confrontations and conflict, then it needs to be found up as high up the chain as it goes) The police who are just trying to do their jobs, and maintain order, should be given respect.</div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">  </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> If one or two protesters do something over-the-line and violent, it would be wrong to say they reflect all protesters.  The same goes for the police. </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">  </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> And it would seem that the protesters at the Occupy site wish the police to step in to keep out those who are aligned with the movement.  They wish to keep some order themselves, and to filter who and who doesn't get to join in the offerings at the site.  And for that they want the police to step in to deal with it.</div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">  </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> I think this is a good line:</div> <blockquote> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> But while officers may be in a no-win situation, at the mercy of orders carried on shifting political winds and locked into conflict with a so-far almost entirely non-violent protest movement eager to frame the force as a symbol of the oppressive system they’re fighting, the NYPD seems to have crossed a line in recent days, as the park has taken on a darker tone with unsteady and unstable types suddenly seeming to emerge from the woodwork.</div> </blockquote> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> One big question is whether it is the action of a few police officers who are crossing the line for whatever reason, or whether it is a organizational strategy and reflective of the whole Department (and my guess is if it was the latter, there would be those in the Department who personally disagreed with it).</div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">  </div> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> Another question, is, if it is true, that there is an effort to "frame the force as a symbol of the oppressive system their fighting," whether this is appropriate framing strategy, or whether it facilitates the potential for future violent conflicts.</div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:29:18 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 139170 at http://dagblog.com Wondering, the Trope, would http://dagblog.com/comment/139165#comment-139165 <a id="comment-139165"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139130#comment-139130">Thanks for pointing this out</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wondering, the Trope, would he identify and stand with the cops sending the homeless and mentally ill to OWS to apparently create incidents so they can smash heads, the cops who demonstrated against the indictments of cops in the Bronx, some grabbing news people and their cameras, the OWS people who try to feed the homeless and anyone else at Zuccotti, or ......?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:38:22 +0000 NCD comment 139165 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for pointing this out http://dagblog.com/comment/139130#comment-139130 <a id="comment-139130"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139114#comment-139114">Cynicism also, among poverty,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for pointing this out NCD. </p> <p>Over on another post "<u>A Progressive Tea party Isn't the Answer"</u></p> <p>Some blind fools, suggest "Oh hell no, there couldn't possibly be a conspiracy, to undermine Democracy."  </p> <p><em>"One of the most ridiculous aspects of democracy will always remain... the fact that it has offered to its mortal enemies the means by which to destroy it"</em>  Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels</p> <p>Maybe the next move by the Mayor and his <strike>brown shirts</strike> Blue shirts will be, burning down the tents and the fire just happened to spread to adjacent buildings, then blame the communists.</p> <p>An old trick, employed by Nero, as Rome burned, blame the Christians.</p> <p>Can’t the FBI investigate this tactic, whose sole purpose is to incite acts of violence?</p> <p>Maybe they can develop a sting operation?  Drunk A is removed by OWS enforcers, but not before a tracking device is placed. Drunk A is taken to a local hospital and dropped off at the door. The police are called by hospital staff and the cops return Drunk A back to the park. Proving to the world; the tactics employed by the government,  to discredit and harass the OWS movement.</p> <p>They've tried tear gas canisters and the public turned on the tactic. Maybe this new tactic by the "mayor’s army" will further expose to what lengths the governing rulership will take, to undermine the peoples will.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="640px"> <object height="360px" style="width: 640px; height: 390px" width="640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aD3xfT0c99g?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="360px" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aD3xfT0c99g?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640px"></embed></object></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:02:16 +0000 Resistance comment 139130 at http://dagblog.com Cynicism also, among poverty, http://dagblog.com/comment/139114#comment-139114 <a id="comment-139114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/poverty-amid-plenty-america-s-continuing-shame-12054">Poverty Amid Plenty – America’s Continuing Shame</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cynicism also, among poverty, mental illness and plenty? Even more shameful?</p> <p>Angry NYC cops who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/29/nyregion/officers-unleash-anger-at-ticket-fixing-arraignments-in-the-bronx.html?sq=police%20bronx%20court&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1&amp;pagewanted=all">3 days ago grabbed cameras </a>and blocked news from covering the indictment on 1600 counts of 16 NYC cops are now reported to be <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/occupy-wall-street-central-a-rift-growing-east-west-sides-plaza-article-1.969320#ixzz1cJaLYYFr">sending the mentally ill and homeless to OWS </a>at Zuccotti Park. This is covered also at <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/cops-apparently-telling-drunken-stree">Crooks and Liars</a>, and without mention of cynical police subterfuge at the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/us/dissenting-or-seeking-shelter-homeless-stake-a-claim-at-protests.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all"> New York Times</a>.</p> <p>Harry Siegel, the<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/occupy-wall-street-central-a-rift-growing-east-west-sides-plaza-article-1.969320#ixzz1cJaLYYFr"> NY Daily News</a>:</p> <p><em>Two different drunks I spoke with last week told me <strong>they’d been encouraged to “take it to Zuccotti” by officers who’d found them drinking in other parks,</strong> and members of the community affairs working group related several similar stories they’d heard while talking with intoxicated or aggressive new arrivals.</em></p> <p class="no_name"><em><strong>The NYPD’s press office declined to comment </strong>on the record about any such policy, but it seems like a logical tactic from a Bloomberg administration that has done its best to make things difficult for the occupation — a way of using its openness against it.</em></p> <p class="no_name">Some might call these most unfortunate street folks 'Mayor Bloomberg's Army'.</p> <p class="no_name"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Serpico">Frank Serpico </a>was not just the only honest cop in New York in his time, he was possibly the only truly honest cop, mayor or public official in NYC history.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:56:36 +0000 NCD comment 139114 at http://dagblog.com What resistance said. http://dagblog.com/comment/139103#comment-139103 <a id="comment-139103"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139101#comment-139101">Amen.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What resistance said.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:58:23 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 139103 at http://dagblog.com Amen. http://dagblog.com/comment/139101#comment-139101 <a id="comment-139101"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139097#comment-139097">I started a prayer to God. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Amen.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:47:43 +0000 Resistance comment 139101 at http://dagblog.com I started a prayer to God. I http://dagblog.com/comment/139097#comment-139097 <a id="comment-139097"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/poverty-amid-plenty-america-s-continuing-shame-12054">Poverty Amid Plenty – America’s Continuing Shame</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I started a prayer to God. I wanted to ask him why he allowed such poverty when he had the power to put a stop to it.</p> <p>But I didn't finish it. I was afraid that he might ask me the same question.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:24:06 +0000 The Decider comment 139097 at http://dagblog.com