dagblog - Comments for "Herman Cain is a goofball who thinks he&#039;s sexy. Who cares?" http://dagblog.com/politics/herman-cain-goofball-who-thinks-hes-sexy-who-cares-12055 Comments for "Herman Cain is a goofball who thinks he's sexy. Who cares?" en I think you can fill several http://dagblog.com/comment/139365#comment-139365 <a id="comment-139365"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139360#comment-139360">Can we get a santorum thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you can fill several volumes yourself - hate to mix the writing of a master with sheer amateurs.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:32:36 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 139365 at http://dagblog.com Can we get a santorum thing http://dagblog.com/comment/139360#comment-139360 <a id="comment-139360"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139351#comment-139351">Apparently tried to get</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Can we get a santorum thing going where we have a contest to precisely define the coupling arrangement (including accessories, pets, pizza toppings) commonly referred to as "999" that Cain would have participated in, had he been successful in luring one or more of his employees to his room?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:09:28 +0000 Rootman comment 139360 at http://dagblog.com Apparently tried to get http://dagblog.com/comment/139351#comment-139351 <a id="comment-139351"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/herman-cain-goofball-who-thinks-hes-sexy-who-cares-12055">Herman Cain is a goofball who thinks he&#039;s sexy. Who cares?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Apparently tried to get employees into his bedroom for some 9-9-9.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:45:48 +0000 Rootman comment 139351 at http://dagblog.com Of Condi, you didn't say http://dagblog.com/comment/139338#comment-139338 <a id="comment-139338"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139285#comment-139285">I have no problems with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of Condi, you didn't say "When Condi Rice [Herman Cain] sang his personal version of "Amazing Grace" before the National Press Club, he reinforces the image of a smiling, subservient imbecile who only exists to entertain white folks."</p> <p>You're being extremely nasty, making him into an Al Jolson/Aunt Jemimah just for singing a song, and then trying to walk it back.</p> <p>Sorry, you're busted. Ugly racist talk.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:37:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 139338 at http://dagblog.com I think you still harbor a http://dagblog.com/comment/139335#comment-139335 <a id="comment-139335"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139285#comment-139285">I have no problems with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>I think you still harbor a desire to argue just for the sake of argument.</em></p> <p>BINGO!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:07:46 +0000 anonymous comment 139335 at http://dagblog.com The inappropriate use of the http://dagblog.com/comment/139331#comment-139331 <a id="comment-139331"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/herman-cain-goofball-who-thinks-hes-sexy-who-cares-12055">Herman Cain is a goofball who thinks he&#039;s sexy. Who cares?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The inappropriate use of the term "high tech lynching" has to be addressed. Clarence Thomas was allowed to get away with this nonsense term during his hearings. Cain has been involved in cases that resulted in cash payments for sexual harassment. Cain remains alive and able to defend himself.</p> <p>Victims of lynching, with few exceptions, die. Dangling feet and contorted faces are the final images of a lynching. Sometimes the bodies were burned and genitals were removed post-mortem. A lynching is a cruel, vile event that silences the victim. Cain is not being lynched. Cain is running for the highest political office in the country and is being asked to address issues that might reflect on his character and whether he is fit for the Presidency.</p> <p>The settlements are real, thus the question of what occurred is valid. Cain can help Ann Coulter prove that "her" Republican blacks are better than the Democratic black riffraff. (Snark, but it was just too tempting to pass up)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:18:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 139331 at http://dagblog.com When I saw Bill Clinton http://dagblog.com/comment/139290#comment-139290 <a id="comment-139290"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139285#comment-139285">I have no problems with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When I saw Bill Clinton perform on "Arsenio", I didn't think that the then Presidential candidate was a particularly talented saxophone player.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:20:22 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 139290 at http://dagblog.com I have no problems with http://dagblog.com/comment/139285#comment-139285 <a id="comment-139285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139276#comment-139276">Wow, that&#039;s an extremely</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have no problems with Cain's religious beliefs. I thought that Ashcroft's singing was ridiculous and I think Cain's singing was ridiculous for the situation. They are politicians not entertainers. Condi's piano playing did not help her wisdom in foreign policy, so I wasn't moved by her performances either..</p> <p>I am merely posting on a website, I associate "getting in their face" with something more active like perhaps a direct email to Ashcroft or Cain, or actively working to defeat them by volunteering for an opponent or by contributing funds to an opponent. My post was is simply venting.</p> <p>You are welcome to your belief that the audience was responding to a great performance. I might also ask if you have any greater insight into the matter. I think you still harbor a desire to argue just for the sake of argument. Have at it. Enjoy yourself. I have moved on.</p> <p>Addendum: Cain was actually singing <span style="font-size:14px;">“He Looked Beyond My Faults and Saw My Need” by </span>Dottie Rambo, so at least I was introduced to a new song.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:07:47 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 139285 at http://dagblog.com Wow, that's an extremely http://dagblog.com/comment/139276#comment-139276 <a id="comment-139276"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139137#comment-139137">Black Republicans are often</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, that's an extremely nasty summary.</p> <p>Why do you have to insult the guy's belief in such an ugly way?</p> <p>Was John Ashcroft a smiling, subservient minstrel for singing "Let the Eagle Soar"? </p> <p>Isn't it okay for people to enjoy their patriotic/religious stuff without me or you having to get in their face?</p> <p>How exactly do you know the audience was "confused" rather than pleased or appreciative? Do you have a magic audience psychology meter?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:53:02 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 139276 at http://dagblog.com I did it. Anonymous is David http://dagblog.com/comment/139261#comment-139261 <a id="comment-139261"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139260#comment-139260">Anon, I don&#039;t know what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I did it. Anonymous is David Seaton. He was banned after flouting multiple warnings. But he continues to waste his time by trying to publish here anonymously. He's been at it for weeks. Sort of disturbing, actually.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:00:49 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 139261 at http://dagblog.com