dagblog - Comments for "Voter Ignorance is Bliss: Romney avoids &#039;the Mormon issue&#039; this time around" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/voter-ignorance-bliss-romney-avoids-mormon-issue-time-around-12073 Comments for "Voter Ignorance is Bliss: Romney avoids 'the Mormon issue' this time around" en I think you can give this tip http://dagblog.com/comment/139392#comment-139392 <a id="comment-139392"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139345#comment-139345">Some tips for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you can give this tip to someone else <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:25:49 +0000 Resistance comment 139392 at http://dagblog.com "Many of MP's harshest http://dagblog.com/comment/139376#comment-139376 <a id="comment-139376"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139330#comment-139330">But I still think the way</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Many of MP's harshest critics here are also some of the loudest pro-Obama voices here."</p> <p>If we're thinking of the same individuals, then you would define "loudly pro-Obama" differently than I.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:19:46 +0000 Ethanator comment 139376 at http://dagblog.com You must have done quite a http://dagblog.com/comment/139361#comment-139361 <a id="comment-139361"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139356#comment-139356">This is an interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You must have done quite a bit of research to find one comment in a thread, not a blogpost, from June of 2011, to prove what?  In my world we call that flailing.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:12:24 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 139361 at http://dagblog.com This is an interesting http://dagblog.com/comment/139356#comment-139356 <a id="comment-139356"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/voter-ignorance-bliss-romney-avoids-mormon-issue-time-around-12073">Voter Ignorance is Bliss: Romney avoids &#039;the Mormon issue&#039; this time around</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is an interesting comment from a previous Romney-related post. <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/wolfrums-morning-say-it-mitts-face-10746">http://dagblog.com/politics/wolfrums-morning-say-it-mitts-face-10746</a></p> <blockquote> <p>Mitt, I understand that Mormons are supposed to wear their funny undies at any time that it is appropriate. If you are elected will you consider your inauguration to be an appropriate time to wear them?</p> </blockquote> <p> </p> <p> The objections it raised are startling. Oh wait.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:47:30 +0000 MuddyPolitics comment 139356 at http://dagblog.com Stoking 'fires of bigotry' is http://dagblog.com/comment/139303#comment-139303 <a id="comment-139303"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139222#comment-139222">Wow. Really? This is going to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Stoking 'fires of bigotry' is a tried and true means to get out the vote in America! To demean it is to derogate our traditions! Bigotry is, in fact, the last and steadfast refuge for the low information voter.</p> <p>I wouldn't mind voting for a Mormon, it would be easier though if they'd open up <a href="http://www.utah.com/mormon/temple_square.htm">The Great Temple</a> in SLC to all, so we can see.....<em>what</em><em> the heck goes on in there!</em></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:11:45 +0000 NCD comment 139303 at http://dagblog.com And a few http://dagblog.com/comment/139347#comment-139347 <a id="comment-139347"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139330#comment-139330">But I still think the way</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And a few less-than-fans-of-Obama have defended MP's right to speak.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:51:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 139347 at http://dagblog.com Oh yes, Hillary polarizing, http://dagblog.com/comment/139346#comment-139346 <a id="comment-139346"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139306#comment-139306">Well, that was part of what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh yes, Hillary polarizing, Obama kumbaya.</p> <p>Glad he kept us out of wars and didn't triangulate and pulled us away from poor Free Trade agreements and ...</p> <p>But yes, it's her fault that the WaPo had to cover her cleavage-showing sweater - twice - and put up a front page article on why Bill might be sleeping with someone else because they spend so much time apart, and TV announcers had to do Nurse Ratched/cross legs jokes and rhymes with "rich" and come on to advertise "cunt t-shirts" </p> <p>It's Hillary's fault - she's so polarizing.</p> <p>And Sarah Palin once won a beauty pageant, so she deserved every gratuitous physical comment she got.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:48:47 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 139346 at http://dagblog.com Some tips for http://dagblog.com/comment/139345#comment-139345 <a id="comment-139345"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139333#comment-139333">I was dog whistling someone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Some tips for you:</p> <p><a href="http://smartzonepsychology.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-not-to-be-drama-queen-or-king.html">http://smartzonepsychology.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-not-to-be-drama-quee...</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:43:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 139345 at http://dagblog.com "The Dem strategists know http://dagblog.com/comment/139344#comment-139344 <a id="comment-139344"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139306#comment-139306">Well, that was part of what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"The Dem strategists know Obama's been polling pretty much even or behind Romney for quite some time."</p> <p>Um, no:</p> <p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:37:49 +0000 Ethanator comment 139344 at http://dagblog.com Be careful, someone might http://dagblog.com/comment/139337#comment-139337 <a id="comment-139337"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/139314#comment-139314">Indeed. This here. Is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Be careful, someone might accuse you of a Godwin, because you mentioned holocaust.</p> <p>They don't want to hear the truth, of how in the modern history of civilized people, some starved and incinerated others, because of religion.</p> <p>Don't bring up German atrocities, they would rather remain blind and deaf.</p> <p>Then they can deny it could ever happen again.  </p> <p>LA, LA, LA, LA, LA  I cant hear you. you're breaking the rules/law  Godwins law , Godwins law, Godwins law. Shut up! You're breaking Godwins law" </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:38:17 +0000 Resistance comment 139337 at http://dagblog.com