dagblog - Comments for "Lawmakers aim to stop Pentagon cuts if deficit panel fails" http://dagblog.com/link/lawmakers-aim-stop-pentagon-cuts-if-deficit-panel-fails-12125 Comments for "Lawmakers aim to stop Pentagon cuts if deficit panel fails" en It would be nice if Obama http://dagblog.com/comment/139950#comment-139950 <a id="comment-139950"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/lawmakers-aim-stop-pentagon-cuts-if-deficit-panel-fails-12125">Lawmakers aim to stop Pentagon cuts if deficit panel fails</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It would be nice if Obama would put the half nelson on Boehner/Cantor and say: you want to 'sustain' forces abroad, you don't wanna cut defense? Then fund it with a tax millionaires you two bit lying blowhards!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:34:40 +0000 NCD comment 139950 at http://dagblog.com I remember reading a few http://dagblog.com/comment/139869#comment-139869 <a id="comment-139869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/lawmakers-aim-stop-pentagon-cuts-if-deficit-panel-fails-12125">Lawmakers aim to stop Pentagon cuts if deficit panel fails</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I remember reading a few months back lobbyists were busy crunching the numbers. Armed with a baseline value of 50% reduction in the DoD budget, if the Super Committee (SC) came up with a number greater, they would lobby enough congress critters to make sure the SC budget would go down in defeat in Congress. To me, all this says is they are finessing their position ... the SC budget will go down if the numbers are over the baseline and Congress isn't allowed to make changes to keep the DoD budget porked up. Same turkey, just dressed up to make it look more innocent.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:49:55 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 139869 at http://dagblog.com