dagblog - Comments for "Santorum previously named Coach Sandusky for "Angels in Adoption" Award"

On Santorum, yeah, I agree.

AmericanDreamer — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:55:30 +0000

On Santorum, yeah, I agree. But schadenfreude with him is especially fun.

We can add this to the list of things Rick Santorum turns out to be completely clueless about.

Maybe he'll announce today that, if chosen as the GOP nominee for President, as a show of his support for family values he'll ask Sandusky to be his running mate. Ha.

Ah Sleepin I just posted a

Richard Day — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:46:49 +0000

In reply to Santorum previously named Coach Sandusky for "Angels in Adoption" Award

Ah Sleepin I just posted a blog noting that Walsh, that repub f#$k who owes child support in the six figure area, received his family best award.

Have you ever seen hypocrisy this straight out?

There is no shame anymore.

But that goddamnable Santorum owes somebody an apology.

Maybe the victims!

Damn!

While I can appreciate a

Verified Atheist — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:20:21 +0000

In reply to Santorum previously named Coach Sandusky for "Angels in Adoption" Award

While I can appreciate a little schadenfreude, unless we have reason to suspect that Santorum knew something that no one here knew, he's no more responsible for that poor choice than Obama/Biden were for Solyndra. (Of course, that works in reverse, too! Any Republicans down on Obama/Biden for Solyndra ought to condemn Santorum for this!)