dagblog - Comments for "Paterno &quot;Why didn&#039;t I get Bishop Finn&#039;s deal?&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/paterno-why-didnt-i-get-bishop-finns-deal-12237 Comments for "Paterno "Why didn't I get Bishop Finn's deal?"" en Thanks Richard. The Finn case http://dagblog.com/comment/141003#comment-141003 <a id="comment-141003"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/140988#comment-140988">I hereby render unto NCD the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks Richard. The Finn case frankly, makes the hubbub over Paterno seem like a vast over reaction. either everyone answers to the same standard, or the law is an ass.</p> <p>I guess we can't say <em>'they worship the game of football'</em>, or that <em>'football is like a religion to them' </em>until coaches wear fancy robes robes, anoint fans with a sprinkling of Gatorade, &amp; dozens of them can get away scot-free with ignoring child abusers among them.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:04:18 +0000 NCD comment 141003 at http://dagblog.com I hereby render unto NCD the http://dagblog.com/comment/140988#comment-140988 <a id="comment-140988"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/paterno-why-didnt-i-get-bishop-finns-deal-12237">Paterno &quot;Why didn&#039;t I get Bishop Finn&#039;s deal?&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hereby render unto NCD the Dayly TITLE of the Week Award for this here DAGBLOG Site, given to all of NCD from all of me.</p> <p>hahahahaah</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:41 +0000 Richard Day comment 140988 at http://dagblog.com Bishop Finn was ALREADY under http://dagblog.com/comment/140981#comment-140981 <a id="comment-140981"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/140980#comment-140980">That&#039;s pretty heinous, but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bishop Finn was ALREADY under a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/us/kansas-city-bishop-indicted-in-reporting-of-abuse-by-priest.html">under a state order</a> to report child abuse when he didn't report this one:</p> <p>..<em>.Bishop Finn himself had made such a promise three years ago as part of a $10 million legal settlement with abuse victims in Kansas City.</em>..</p> <p>It's outrageous, not only what these Catholic priests get by with, but how they keep attacking others (gays, planned parenthood etc) while they give their fellow child molesting cohorts a free pass and 'holy' communion.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:37:36 +0000 NCD comment 140981 at http://dagblog.com That's pretty heinous, but http://dagblog.com/comment/140980#comment-140980 <a id="comment-140980"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/paterno-why-didnt-i-get-bishop-finns-deal-12237">Paterno &quot;Why didn&#039;t I get Bishop Finn&#039;s deal?&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's pretty heinous, but the real question is, why doesn't Bishop Finn get JoePa's "deal"? Some jail time (accessory after the fact, but of course IANAL) seems like it would be in order as well, assuming that this meets the burden of evidence (and it sounds like it probably would).</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:16:11 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 140980 at http://dagblog.com