dagblog - Comments for "How do you spell C R O O K? It&#039;s P A U L S.................." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-do-you-spell-c-r-o-o-k-its-p-u-l-s-12359 Comments for "How do you spell C R O O K? It's P A U L S.................." en I know and decided to ignore http://dagblog.com/comment/142632#comment-142632 <a id="comment-142632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/142292#comment-142292">Most of the lawyers quoted in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know and decided to ignore that when I called Paulson a crook.</p> <p>If you give Wllie Sutton a key to the bank I think you've behaved illegally even if he doesn't cut you in  on the loot. .</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:00:56 +0000 Flavius comment 142632 at http://dagblog.com Most of the lawyers quoted in http://dagblog.com/comment/142292#comment-142292 <a id="comment-142292"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-do-you-spell-c-r-o-o-k-its-p-u-l-s-12359">How do you spell C R O O K? It&#039;s P A U L S..................</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Most of the lawyers quoted in the Bloomberg piece seem to think that while Paulson's disclosure was unethical, it was not illegal since he personally did not trade on the information.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:28:09 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 142292 at http://dagblog.com Speaking for myself, I don't http://dagblog.com/comment/142290#comment-142290 <a id="comment-142290"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/142286#comment-142286">Hmn, not much interest. Oh</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Speaking for myself, I don't know enough about the law to have an informed opinion of the matter.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:54:01 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 142290 at http://dagblog.com Hmn, not much interest. Oh http://dagblog.com/comment/142286#comment-142286 <a id="comment-142286"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-do-you-spell-c-r-o-o-k-its-p-u-l-s-12359">How do you spell C R O O K? It&#039;s P A U L S..................</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmn, not much interest.</p> <p>Oh well, so the Secretary of the Treasury has broken the law against insider trading.Yawn. What else is new? </p> <p>It's interesting to google the subject. Apart from  Keith, it was covered by various media aimed at investors but not by the Times, or FT or NPR or PBS. </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:36:15 +0000 Flavius comment 142286 at http://dagblog.com