dagblog - Comments for "Debate live-blog" http://dagblog.com/politics/debate-live-blog Comments for "Debate live-blog" en Hey, bee!  Long time, no http://dagblog.com/comment/234#comment-234 <a id="comment-234"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/231#comment-231">Hey, I didn&#039;t know you were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, bee!  Long time, no see.  It was kind of a last-minute thing.  Sorry about the lack of notice.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:50:07 +0000 DF comment 234 at http://dagblog.com Hey, I didn't know you were http://dagblog.com/comment/231#comment-231 <a id="comment-231"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/debate-live-blog">Debate live-blog</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, I didn't know you were doing this</p> <p><br /><img src="/modules/tinymce/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-frown.gif" alt="Frown" title="Frown" border="0" /></p> <p>Catch ya next time.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:41:02 +0000 workerbee comment 231 at http://dagblog.com that tactic of staying on http://dagblog.com/comment/230#comment-230 <a id="comment-230"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226#comment-226">Excellent. I didn&#039;t know that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>that tactic of staying on message, question be damned, may work, but it still pisses me off, and Obama was annoyingly good at it tonight. I thought this debate was yet another snooze-fest; I was kind of hoping McCain would throw some desperate haymaker zingers. No such luck. Just the same bunch of talking points and ticky-tack, back-and-forth shit we've heard over and over again ... from both sides.</p> <p>The only interesting thing to me was that I thought McCain looked tired, old and somewhat confused at times (I mentioned to my girlfriend that I thought he was also breathing very heavy). I agree that Obama again won, 30% on the strength of his own performance, and 70% by default because McCain needed a gamechanger and didn't find one.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:01:04 +0000 Deadman comment 230 at http://dagblog.com I predict that there will be http://dagblog.com/comment/228#comment-228 <a id="comment-228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227#comment-227">It was kind of a last minute</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I predict that there will be a lot of "Obama won," as there seems to be already, but less of the "McCain didn't look at Obama" and related body language divination crap.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:39:14 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 228 at http://dagblog.com It was kind of a last minute http://dagblog.com/comment/227#comment-227 <a id="comment-227"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226#comment-226">Excellent. I didn&#039;t know that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It was kind of a last minute decision.  I'd never done it before.  I'd probably do it a bit differently next time, but all in all it was fun.</p> <p>I think you nailed the post-debate analysis.  I hadn't quite placed my finger on Obama's shift in delivering his answers, but I think you're exactly right.  McCain needed him to screw up.  Not only did he not screw up, but he improved.</p> <p>I guess we'll see how the spin comes out.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:33:00 +0000 DF comment 227 at http://dagblog.com Excellent. I didn't know that http://dagblog.com/comment/226#comment-226 <a id="comment-226"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/debate-live-blog">Debate live-blog</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excellent. I didn't know that you were live blogging tonight. Well done, sir.</p> <p>I second the win. Further, I think that this is the best debate Obama has done. Cool, on message, and presidential looking, as you've mentioned, but something more. He often has a tendency to get stuck in his head, like he's thinking hard about the question and forgetting that he's supposed to be communicating to an audience. You didn't see that in this debate. Instead of focusing on answering the question in a way that precisely measured his thoughts on the subject, he focused on the message that he wanted to present to the audience, question be damned. This tactic used to piss me off when Reagan did it, but doggone it, it works.</p> <p>Big loss for McCain tonight, not because he lost badly but because he desperately needed a big win. And wasn't the townhall format suppost to be his element?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:22:58 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 226 at http://dagblog.com