dagblog - Comments for "Ron Paul:&quot;Even the Nazis got trials.&quot;" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/ron-pauleven-nazis-got-trials-12616 Comments for "Ron Paul:"Even the Nazis got trials."" en You are right, tmac. Every http://dagblog.com/comment/145730#comment-145730 <a id="comment-145730"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145725#comment-145725">Let&#039;s set the record straight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are right, tmac. Every once in a while, I indulge in meta, thinking it will be productive, but it always gets nasty.</p> <p>This thread has gone on long enough. I'm shutting it down now.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:00:05 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 145730 at http://dagblog.com Yes, they're poor because of http://dagblog.com/comment/145728#comment-145728 <a id="comment-145728"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145713#comment-145713">Yes, the lack of education is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, they're poor because of their culture - look at Mexico, look at most of Latin America.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:44:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 145728 at http://dagblog.com Hey, T-Mac, since we are not http://dagblog.com/comment/145727#comment-145727 <a id="comment-145727"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145725#comment-145725">Let&#039;s set the record straight</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, T-Mac, since we are not infrequently butting heads, and unencumbered by actually having read your oath keepers comment, I wish firmly to enroll myself on the side of thinking they are delusional, self-important, posturing assholes, who are attempting to fill a huge inner void where confidence would live, if they had any.</p> <p>And racists, also.  Just my 2 cents.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:40:10 +0000 jollyroger comment 145727 at http://dagblog.com I see that I can get a paper http://dagblog.com/comment/145726#comment-145726 <a id="comment-145726"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145697#comment-145697">It&#039;s there in the fine print.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I see that I can get a paper copy, albeit used, for $.99. However, I'm going to buy it as a Nook Book-:)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:36:24 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 145726 at http://dagblog.com Let's set the record straight http://dagblog.com/comment/145725#comment-145725 <a id="comment-145725"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145719#comment-145719">There shades and contextual</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Let's set the record straight though Genghis, <strong>I didn't ask any one to moderate anything.</strong> I just commented back to kgb, after he called me a racist. So yeah, Genghis, someone was called a racist, me, and I didn't say shit to you.  Did I offend some very delicate sensibilities. Oh well, I guess they will have to toughen up.</p> <p>I feel so flattered though, people dragging with them from thread to thread a personal anger about some flippant comment I made Oath Keepers, who are in fact white supremacists (= racists) who want to overthrow a democratically elected government and they see this as the first step. Who takes that personally? Seriously? Wow.</p> <p>Gee Genghis, I thought these meta discussions about other bloggers were taboo. Yet you seem to encouraging this meta discussion about me. I think it kind of sucks.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:29:12 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 145725 at http://dagblog.com pro-European American Ya http://dagblog.com/comment/145724#comment-145724 <a id="comment-145724"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145699#comment-145699">1) In what way would you be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>pro-European American</em></p> <p>Ya gotta understand, that Europeans, having two millenia or so of stealing everything on the globe that wasn't nailed down, and trying to fence in the stuff they couldn't move, are a little nervous now that information tech is permitting their prey to compare notes, and stuff.  They need some affirmative action on the do unto others thing.  (also, for dancing--there is nothing scarier than a straight white boy trying to dance)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:27:25 +0000 jollyroger comment 145724 at http://dagblog.com And how was "Anonymous http://dagblog.com/comment/145722#comment-145722 <a id="comment-145722"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145717#comment-145717">Your interjection is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And how was "Anonymous LULU's" "interjection" "helpful?"  Or was it "welcome" under some obscure provision of the TOS that less-favored participants aren't privy to?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:00:27 +0000 Ethanator comment 145722 at http://dagblog.com There shades and contextual http://dagblog.com/comment/145719#comment-145719 <a id="comment-145719"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145712#comment-145712">If I&#039;m discussing racial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There shades and contextual differences of course, but we don't have time or energy to parse that much or explain the intricacies to people. It's a simple rule, easily explained and enforced: don't accuse of other dagbloggers of racism.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:21:02 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 145719 at http://dagblog.com Your interjection is http://dagblog.com/comment/145717#comment-145717 <a id="comment-145717"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145715#comment-145715">Please explain how kgb got</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your interjection is unhelpful and unwelcome. Please stay out of it.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:17:19 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 145717 at http://dagblog.com Please explain how kgb got http://dagblog.com/comment/145715#comment-145715 <a id="comment-145715"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145703#comment-145703">I quit commenting before I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Please explain how kgb got "hit" by someone making fun of two members of Oath Keepers (a quasi-militia group with, to be charitable, fringe minority views on government and the constitution), men who don't even live in kgb's home state?</p> <p>What kgb did was the equivalent of a "flop" in basketball.  When no foul was called, he cried to the refs, who were right to ignore it.  He's the Danny Ainge of dagblog.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:12:37 +0000 Ethanator comment 145715 at http://dagblog.com