dagblog - Comments for "A Thing or Two About Twins" http://dagblog.com/link/thing-or-two-about-twins-12639 Comments for "A Thing or Two About Twins" en (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/145392#comment-145392 <a id="comment-145392"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145390#comment-145390">May I recommend The Cartoon</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="" src="http://images.wallaceandgromit.com/films/granddayout/gallery/gdo_nsg_5_0.jpg" style="width: 400px; height: 295px; " /></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:52:30 +0000 Donal comment 145392 at http://dagblog.com May I recommend The Cartoon http://dagblog.com/comment/145390#comment-145390 <a id="comment-145390"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145388#comment-145388">I am not going to be able to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>May I recommend <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Guide-Genetics-Updated/dp/0062730991">The Cartoon Guide to Genetics</a>? (Seriously, that's an outstanding book.) There's also a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Guide-Physics-Larry-Gonick/dp/0062731009">Cartoon Guide to Physics</a> that I actually used while teaching public high school instead of the godawful text book I was supposed to use. (Well, I did <em>occasionally</em> use the text book for the one or two topics not covered in the cartoon guide, but besides the cartoon guide being a more enjoyable read, it was also more accurate - not a single error in it, unlike our text book.)</p> <p>Larry Gonick has written a lot of Cartoon Guides. I think I've read and enjoyed every single last one.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:41:51 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145390 at http://dagblog.com I am not going to be able to http://dagblog.com/comment/145388#comment-145388 <a id="comment-145388"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145251#comment-145251">If instead of &quot;nature versus</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am not going to be able to join you in arguing with a National Geographic cover story, as even that low level of biological science is somewhat over my head. (Somehow I got through Botany 101 to fulfill the undergrad biological science requirement, but even in that they had a DNA/RNA section that pulled me down to my only C on my record. I just don't wanna git it, give me physics instead anytime.) <img alt="sad" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/sad_smile.gif" title="sad" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:29:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 145388 at http://dagblog.com Perhaps my definition of http://dagblog.com/comment/145382#comment-145382 <a id="comment-145382"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145347#comment-145347">this &quot;third factor&quot; is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps my definition of "environment" is looser than yours (or the average person's), but I include womb conditions as part of that. Differences in coat color are governed primarily by epi-genetics, which in this particular case are a bit like rolling a die (or to be more precise, they're strongly non-linear). A little more chemical in this part of the womb or that part and one kitten has one pattern and another kitten, with the exact same genes, has a different pattern (or even color).</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:44:00 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145382 at http://dagblog.com this "third factor" is http://dagblog.com/comment/145347#comment-145347 <a id="comment-145347"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145251#comment-145251">If instead of &quot;nature versus</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; "> this "third factor" is covered under "environment",</span></em></p> <p>Not<span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; "> necessarily.  One documentary showed a cloned litter of kittens with as much variation in coloring as a normal litter.</span></p> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">​It is way too soon in genetic studies to claim any final answers.</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:10:29 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 145347 at http://dagblog.com If instead of "nature versus http://dagblog.com/comment/145251#comment-145251 <a id="comment-145251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/thing-or-two-about-twins-12639">A Thing or Two About Twins</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If instead of "nature versus nurture", one uses the <em>almost</em> equivalent "environment versus genetics", this "third factor" is covered under "environment", although that also underscores the "almost" in "almost equivalent".</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:58:32 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145251 at http://dagblog.com