dagblog - Comments for "ROMNEY WINS IOWA BY 8 VOTES" http://dagblog.com/link/romney-wins-iowa-12-votes-12647 Comments for "ROMNEY WINS IOWA BY 8 VOTES" en That's true. But if the race http://dagblog.com/comment/145461#comment-145461 <a id="comment-145461"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145455#comment-145455">Absolutely. I&#039;m guessing the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's true.  But if the race turns out to be Newt vs Mitt, then Newt could end up picking up Santorum's.  If Santorum is still in it to win it, then these will be very important towards the end of the horse race. </p> <p>Appearances are indeed important and that's why SC is critical for Newt. A win there and he'll pass both Santorum and Mitt in total delegates (even with Mitt's gain from NH).  It makes it a legitimate three way race in Florida.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:31:14 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 145461 at http://dagblog.com For what it's worth, although http://dagblog.com/comment/145456#comment-145456 <a id="comment-145456"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/romney-wins-iowa-12-votes-12647">ROMNEY WINS IOWA BY 8 VOTES</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For what it's worth, although <a href="http://iowacaucus.com/">IowaCaucus.com</a> is also reporting the 8-vote victory, they have "1766 of 1774 precincts reporting". ¿Que?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:28:45 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145456 at http://dagblog.com Absolutely. I'm guessing the http://dagblog.com/comment/145455#comment-145455 <a id="comment-145455"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145453#comment-145453">But all those delegates are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Absolutely. I'm guessing the 13-12 will be used as part of the horse race, however, and the <em>appearance</em> of leading is very important in such races (well, for political ones—I'm not sure how much it matters for the equine ones).</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:22:12 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145455 at http://dagblog.com But all those delegates are http://dagblog.com/comment/145453#comment-145453 <a id="comment-145453"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145449#comment-145449">They&#039;re currently reporting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But all those delegates are unbound.  The official allocation of delegates for the convention won't occur until the state convention in June.  In 2008, McCain who only got 17% of the popular vote in Iowa was allocated all the delegates at the convention.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:15:23 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 145453 at http://dagblog.com They're currently reporting http://dagblog.com/comment/145449#comment-145449 <a id="comment-145449"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145445#comment-145445">No, Mitt won! no kidding! By</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They're currently reporting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120104/us-gop-campaign-delegates/">13 to Mitt and 12 to Rick</a>.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:11:58 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 145449 at http://dagblog.com No, Mitt won! no kidding! By http://dagblog.com/comment/145445#comment-145445 <a id="comment-145445"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145444#comment-145444">I sincerely doubt it ...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, Mitt won! no kidding! By 8 votes!</p> <p>No recount, no redo, no Supreme Court decision!</p> <p>11 delegates go to mitt and rick.</p> <p>Paul gets 3.</p> <p>That's it!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:38:27 +0000 Richard Day comment 145445 at http://dagblog.com I sincerely doubt it ... http://dagblog.com/comment/145444#comment-145444 <a id="comment-145444"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/145443#comment-145443">Here might be a better</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I sincerely doubt it ... that's about a summary as it gets ... but I'll take a look anyhow.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:18:36 +0000 kgb999 comment 145444 at http://dagblog.com Here might be a better http://dagblog.com/comment/145443#comment-145443 <a id="comment-145443"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/romney-wins-iowa-12-votes-12647">ROMNEY WINS IOWA BY 8 VOTES</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here might be a better summary:</p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/mitt-romney-iowa-caucus-results-2012_n_1181822.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/mitt-romney-iowa-caucus-results-2012_n_1181822.html</a></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in"> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:07:19 +0000 Richard Day comment 145443 at http://dagblog.com