dagblog - Comments for "Idiocy and Ratings Agencies" http://dagblog.com/politics/idiocy-and-ratings-agencies-12754 Comments for "Idiocy and Ratings Agencies" en (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/146731#comment-146731 <a id="comment-146731"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/146703#comment-146703">(No subject)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/I-DgIU4E9Mo" width="420px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:35:00 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 146731 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/146704#comment-146704 <a id="comment-146704"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/146703#comment-146703">(No subject)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/G9zf4iSy7Zo" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:16:56 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 146704 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/146703#comment-146703 <a id="comment-146703"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/idiocy-and-ratings-agencies-12754">Idiocy and Ratings Agencies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/toHlMD50eYY" width="420px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:04:21 +0000 Richard Day comment 146703 at http://dagblog.com I know, I know. http://dagblog.com/comment/146674#comment-146674 <a id="comment-146674"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/146648#comment-146648">Dude. Habs. WTF?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know, I know.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:52:55 +0000 acanuck comment 146674 at http://dagblog.com To me, all of the actions http://dagblog.com/comment/146651#comment-146651 <a id="comment-146651"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/146644#comment-146644">I heard a few weeks ago that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To me, all of the actions seem heavy handed, starting with downgrading the U.S.</p> <p>I suspect that this is largely about image.  The U.S.government made itself vulnerable by having a year-long, idiotic debate about the debt ceiling.  When people say that the U.S., because it controls its own dollar, can "never default," they really mean, "can never default unless the system breaks so badly that it would do something stupid like default voluntarily, which is what a failure to raise the debt ceiling would have been.</p> <p>So, S&amp;P's analysts saw a reasonable opening to make history by downgrading the United States.  And... they took it.</p> <p>But, they didn't take it in context.  France and Germany have similar debt problems and don't control the currency that they owe in.  So, logic would suggest that they be downgraded first, or that all be downgraded at once.  They didn't follow logic.</p> <p>If you, as an investor, had followed S&amp;P's logic, you would have sold all of your Treasuries in August and bought French bonds.  Investors, apparently, are smarter than that and did the opposite.</p> <p>But, I notice that the media has been largely silent about what Mel Brooks might have called "The French Mistake."</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:41:00 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 146651 at http://dagblog.com Dude. Habs. WTF? http://dagblog.com/comment/146648#comment-146648 <a id="comment-146648"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/146641#comment-146641">Yeah, like I&#039;m going to lend</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dude. Habs. WTF?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:32:10 +0000 Qnonymous comment 146648 at http://dagblog.com I heard a few weeks ago that http://dagblog.com/comment/146644#comment-146644 <a id="comment-146644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/idiocy-and-ratings-agencies-12754">Idiocy and Ratings Agencies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I heard a few weeks ago that there was an investigation into some of the S &amp; P principals.  Have you heard anything more lately?</p> <p>I agree with your post - this action seems a bit, at the least, 'heavy-handed'.  But, if so, why?  Any thoughts, opinions? </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:25:09 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 146644 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, like I'm going to lend http://dagblog.com/comment/146641#comment-146641 <a id="comment-146641"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/idiocy-and-ratings-agencies-12754">Idiocy and Ratings Agencies</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, like I'm going to lend <em>you</em> two bricks of gold! I'm not falling for that again.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:19:39 +0000 acanuck comment 146641 at http://dagblog.com