dagblog - Comments for "Gallup: Newt 32 (+1) Mitt 24 (-1)" http://dagblog.com/link/gallup-newt-32-1-mitt-24-1-12896 Comments for "Gallup: Newt 32 (+1) Mitt 24 (-1)" en Dave Maraniss op-ed from WaPo http://dagblog.com/comment/148042#comment-148042 <a id="comment-148042"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gallup-newt-32-1-mitt-24-1-12896">Gallup: Newt 32 (+1) Mitt 24 (-1)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dave Maraniss op-ed from <em>WaPo</em> Jan. 22:</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/time-to-bring-back-bill-clinton/2012/01/22/gIQApTrbJQ_story.html">Time to bring back Bill Clinton</a></p> <p>It's really about Newt, the Clinton/Newt mano a mano relationship, and it's fun, like this old quote he got from Newt that he dug up, about Clinton:</p> <p><em>“I melt when I’m around him. After I get out, I need two hours to detoxify. My people are nervous about me going in there because of the way I deal with this.”</em></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:41:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 148042 at http://dagblog.com I have to admit it's some http://dagblog.com/comment/148008#comment-148008 <a id="comment-148008"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/147996#comment-147996">Also too I think it behooves,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have to admit it's some comfort knowing that the GOP base finds itself in the same spot that progressives did! (Seen as a cheap source of votes.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:48:41 +0000 erica20 comment 148008 at http://dagblog.com This is a good point. The http://dagblog.com/comment/148001#comment-148001 <a id="comment-148001"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/147996#comment-147996">Also too I think it behooves,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is a good point.  The little problem for the establishment Rs right now is that Florida is a closed primary so Independents can't vote.  They might be rethinking that policy right at the moment.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:12:59 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 148001 at http://dagblog.com Also too I think it behooves, http://dagblog.com/comment/147996#comment-147996 <a id="comment-147996"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gallup-newt-32-1-mitt-24-1-12896">Gallup: Newt 32 (+1) Mitt 24 (-1)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Also too I think it behooves, in prognosticating, to keep this at the top of mind:</p> <blockquote> <p>....Borger just now said new polls of Independents show they don't like the current Newt show one bit, Obama wins over Newt with them more than 2 to 1, that's what's scaring the GOP....</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mitt-gets-plummety-newt-31-mitt-25-3-12880#comment-147894"><span class="submitted">by artappraiser <span class="created">1/26/2012 - 11:13 pm </span> </span></a></p> </blockquote> <p>Like Rahm Emmanuel with "progressives," GOP leaders don't really give a flying about what the base wants on this race: <em>Independents rool when it comes to the presidency?</em> If Mitt can eke out wins state by state and amass delegates, they don't care if base support is lukewarm, they want the guy who can win Independents, not scare them away? Like with Rahm, it's "the base has nowhere else to go, don't worry about them"?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:26:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 147996 at http://dagblog.com Here's a link to some http://dagblog.com/comment/147990#comment-147990 <a id="comment-147990"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/gallup-newt-32-1-mitt-24-1-12896">Gallup: Newt 32 (+1) Mitt 24 (-1)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's a link to some discussion on yesterday's events on Articleman's old "Mitt 25%" thread:</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mitt-gets-plummety-newt-31-mitt-25-3-12880#comment-147977">http://dagblog.com/link/mitt-gets-plummety-newt-31-mitt-25-3-12880#comme...</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:05:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 147990 at http://dagblog.com