dagblog - Comments for "A brief history of American Industrial Policy" http://dagblog.com/link/brief-history-american-industrial-policy-12928 Comments for "A brief history of American Industrial Policy" en "Thanks for the link, http://dagblog.com/comment/148364#comment-148364 <a id="comment-148364"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148333#comment-148333">Thanks for the link,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size:13px;"><em>"<span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 17px; ">Thanks for the link, Emma.</span>"</em></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">Right back at you.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">I certainly agree with Diamandis that:</span></p> <blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 24px; text-align: left; ">We are now entering a ­period of radical transformation. Progress in artificial intelligence, robotics, infinite computing, ubiquitous broadband networks, digital manufacturing, nanomaterials, synthetic ­biology and many other breakthrough technologies will let us make greater gains in the next two decades than we’ve made in the previous 200 years. <strong>We will soon have the ability to meet and exceed the basic needs of every man, woman, and child on the planet. Abundance for all is within our grasp.</strong></span></span></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">What I fear is that the current haves will figure out that what they have will be much less meaningful at that point and find some way to conserve and even expand the gap between themselves and the have-nots.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px;">​That and the possibility of a DIYer or CERN stumbling onto </span><a href="https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=ice+nine" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; text-align: left; ">ice nine</a><span style="font-size:13px;"> or something equivalent.  ;-\</span></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:56:15 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 148364 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the link, http://dagblog.com/comment/148333#comment-148333 <a id="comment-148333"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/brief-history-american-industrial-policy-12928">A brief history of American Industrial Policy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the link, Emma.</p> <p>Sorta related: I was just looking over a Feb. 13<em> Forbes </em>magazine and there is t<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/briancaulfield/2012/01/26/abundance-why-the-future-will-be-much-better-than-you-think/">his essay by Peter H. Diamandis, a sort of abstract of his book <em>Abundance: Why The Future Will Be Much Better Than You Think</em></a>. It's extremely boosterish about private innovation, sort of an opposite view, but there are some interesting arguments he makes about big picture history. Judging from a skim of<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/briancaulfield/2012/01/26/peter-diamandis-rocket-man/"> the accompanying <em>Forbes</em> article about him</a>, being Mr.. Innovation Booster is his raison d'etre.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:45:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 148333 at http://dagblog.com