http://dagblog.com/link/panetta-sets-end-afghan-combat-role-us-13-12943 Comments for "Panetta Sets End to Afghan Combat Role for U.S. in ’13" en http://dagblog.com/comment/148531#comment-148531 <a id="comment-148531"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/panetta-sets-end-afghan-combat-role-us-13-12943">Panetta Sets End to Afghan Combat Role for U.S. in ’13</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/02/afghanistan_when_we_don_t_like_being_in_a_war_we_turn_it_over_to_contractors">Afghanistan: When we don’t like being in a war, we turn it over to contractors?</a><br /> Posted By Thomas E. Ricks, <em>Best Defense</em> @ ForeignPolicy.com, Feb. 2, 2012</p> <p>That apparently is Defense Secretary Panetta's <a href="http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/02/daily_brief_us_to_end_combat_role_in_afghanistan_in_2013_panetta">plan</a> for war termination in Afghanistan. That's what I take away from this <a href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;mode=form&amp;id=d16424d99d4c0ffae780d9660a849f5e&amp;tab=core&amp;_cview=1" target="_blank">Request for Proposals</a> [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:18:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 148531 at http://dagblog.com