dagblog - Comments for "Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/black-ribbon-campaign-against-susan-g-komen-foundation-12952 Comments for "Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation" en Penn State College of http://dagblog.com/comment/149069#comment-149069 <a id="comment-149069"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/black-ribbon-campaign-against-susan-g-komen-foundation-12952">Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Penn State College of Medicine developed a cure &amp; wrote about in medical journals last August. Since then I've been blogging about it telling the public to donate directly to the researchers and quit sending it to these organizations who have been extorting money for decades with the promise of a 'cure.' Quit wasting your money'pink-washing'...spending the money on pink crap, &amp; on massive ad campaigns telling us to "Be Aware!" All you're doing when you send your hard-earned money to non-profit breast cancer organizations is perpetuating their foundations and perpetuating breast cancer.</div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:01:05 +0000 Janet Werner comment 149069 at http://dagblog.com It does feel like people http://dagblog.com/comment/148860#comment-148860 <a id="comment-148860"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148694#comment-148694">ONE HELL OF A CONCLUSION! You</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It does feel like people everywhere just went "Um, no, not this time" about this particular situation. Which is good.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:23:57 +0000 erica20 comment 148860 at http://dagblog.com Additional info on the http://dagblog.com/comment/148788#comment-148788 <a id="comment-148788"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148782#comment-148782">In a stroke of good timing,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Additional info on the documentary I just mentioned:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nfb.ca/playlist/pink_ribbons_inc/">http://www.nfb.ca/playlist/pink_ribbons_inc/</a></p> <p>It's based on the book Pink Ribbons, Inc. by Samantha King, which might be easier to track down than the film itself. </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:42:28 +0000 acanuck comment 148788 at http://dagblog.com In a stroke of good timing, http://dagblog.com/comment/148782#comment-148782 <a id="comment-148782"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/black-ribbon-campaign-against-susan-g-komen-foundation-12952">Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In a stroke of good timing, Canada's National Film Board has just released a documentary on the corporatization of breast-cancer fundraising:</p> <p><a href="http://thechronicleherald.ca/artslife/58513-pink-ribbons-inc-asks-who-benefits-cause">http://thechronicleherald.ca/artslife/58513-pink-ribbons-inc-asks-who-benefits-cause</a></p> <p>Some money does trickle down to actual research, but less than you'd think -- and less than should.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:57:08 +0000 acanuck comment 148782 at http://dagblog.com Non profits in the US can http://dagblog.com/comment/148713#comment-148713 <a id="comment-148713"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148658#comment-148658">That is indeed a lot of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Non profits in the US can keep up to 85% of what they raise for expenses depending on their 501 class. Some of these charities can be a real ego trip for the managers and reward themselves with extravagant parties for fundraiser. </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:06:10 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 148713 at http://dagblog.com What needs to be said here is http://dagblog.com/comment/148712#comment-148712 <a id="comment-148712"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148699#comment-148699">Media reports are coming out</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">What needs to be said here is Koman foundation doesn't know if they will be able to raise the same amount of money as in the past. Corporations that make products that consumers buy are sensitive to brewhahas like this one. Lists of corporate partners of Koman was published all over the net. I am sure those companies were hammered with complaints. One of the major complaints that was made before this firestorm, was the extravagant galas and spending they did.</div></div></div> Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:51:13 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 148712 at http://dagblog.com Media reports are coming out http://dagblog.com/comment/148699#comment-148699 <a id="comment-148699"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/black-ribbon-campaign-against-susan-g-komen-foundation-12952">Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Media reports are coming out now stating that 'the reversal' isn't all it seems.  Under News I posted a report and now TPM has posted an article which includes:</p> <blockquote> <p>Despite this backtrack, one part of the statement still <strong>provides some uncertainty about the future relationship between Komen and Planned Parenthood. Though Komen said it won’t cut current grants to Planned Parenthood and will still preserve Planned Parenthood’s eligibility to apply for future grants, the statement does not say it will necessarily grant them.</strong></p> <p>“We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities,” the statement said.</p> <p>And Komen board member John Raffaelli indicated to Greg Sargent of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/komen-caved-or-did-it/2012/02/03/gIQA9tS9mQ_blog.html"><em><u><font color="#0066cc">Washington Post</font></u></em></a> that nothing is certain about the future relationship.</p> </blockquote> <p>They were always going to honor grants already in place.  PP has pending grant applications with PP, which some report sources within SGK are concerned no one is addressing these and are concerned.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:06:22 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 148699 at http://dagblog.com ONE HELL OF A CONCLUSION! You http://dagblog.com/comment/148694#comment-148694 <a id="comment-148694"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/black-ribbon-campaign-against-susan-g-komen-foundation-12952">Black Ribbon Campaign against Susan G. Komen Foundation</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ONE HELL OF A CONCLUSION!</p> <p>You won.</p> <p>You and Mac and ten thousand? won the day.</p> <p>They gave up and PP won at least another 2/3 of a million bucks from contributors who were pissed including shorty from NYC!</p> <p>I am not sure why, but I am elated by these events. ha</p> <p>Planned Parenthood with roots going back almost a century as I stated before, is coming out of all of this very well.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:31:39 +0000 Richard Day comment 148694 at http://dagblog.com That is indeed a lot of http://dagblog.com/comment/148658#comment-148658 <a id="comment-148658"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148609#comment-148609">Komen stopped $12 million</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That is indeed a lot of overhead. Wikipedia says Brinker, Komen founder and now CEO, pulls in more than half a million dollars a year. For years, I have taken part in the CIBC "pink ribbon" Run for the Cure, Canadian counterpart to the Komen breast-cancer runs. I would hate to think that as little as 10% of what it collects for the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation goes to actual testing and research. Maybe I need to do a little research myself.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:03:06 +0000 acanuck comment 148658 at http://dagblog.com Thanks VA! http://dagblog.com/comment/148634#comment-148634 <a id="comment-148634"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/148633#comment-148633">Some Planned Parenthood</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks VA!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:56:02 +0000 erica20 comment 148634 at http://dagblog.com