dagblog - Comments for "Michigan: Santorum Country" http://dagblog.com/link/michigan-santorum-country-13065 Comments for "Michigan: Santorum Country" en Can Rick Santorum maintain http://dagblog.com/comment/149825#comment-149825 <a id="comment-149825"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/michigan-santorum-country-13065">Michigan: Santorum Country</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <div class="hide-on-popup" id="Position1"> Can Rick Santorum maintain the momentum? Here's what the polls say - video<br /> 16 February 2012<br /><br /> Guardian polling expert Harry J Enten gives his analysis of Rick Santorum's radical surge in the polls ahead of the Michigan Republican presidential primary on 20 February. Will his popularity among conservatives eventually nosedive in the same way Newt Gingrich's did, or could he simply be outspent by the Mitt Romney campaign juggernaut?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2012/feb/16/rick-santorum-harry-enten-analysis-video">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2012/feb/16/rick-santorum-harry-enten-analysis-video</a></div> </blockquote> <p>It's only 2:11 long and worth watching; basically he explains that the most recent trend is stabilization with Santorum surge no longer a surge and only a couple points ahead, and Romney attacks ads can probably reverse that. He also dismisses that attack ads will backfire with voters (except for the ones that are political junkies) and explains why.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:35:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 149825 at http://dagblog.com P.S.: It would follow that on http://dagblog.com/comment/149743#comment-149743 <a id="comment-149743"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/149742#comment-149742">I think the subheading that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S.: It would follow that on <em>SuperPAC cluster bombs</em>, most won't care as they don't like any of them that much to start with. Bring 'em on, they will reinforce things they are already thinking.</p> <p>I should add that the chart on Republican voter satisfaction compares Oct/Nov numbers with current numbers, and shows large downward drops for the whole and for each group. The more they get to know 'em, the less they like 'em.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:00:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 149743 at http://dagblog.com I think the subheading that http://dagblog.com/comment/149742#comment-149742 <a id="comment-149742"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/michigan-santorum-country-13065">Michigan: Santorum Country</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think the subheading that they used in the <em>New York Time</em>s print edition today for<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/15/us/politics/economic-gains-give-lift-to-obama-in-poll.html?ref=todayspaper"> the article on the new NYT/CBS poll</a> summed it all up well:</p> <p><em>GOP VOTERS SAY THEY WANT MORE CHOICES</em></p> <p>The number: only 34% of all Republican primary voters are satisfied with the current choices, 62% want more choices. For self-identified Conservatives, the numbers are 34/61, for Evangelical Christians, 33/63,  for Tea Partiers, 39/57. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/02/15/us/politics/americans-on-president-obama-and-the-economy.html?ref=politics">(Chart here.</a>)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:45:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 149742 at http://dagblog.com damned if he does and damned http://dagblog.com/comment/149739#comment-149739 <a id="comment-149739"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/149736#comment-149736">The super pacs may of save</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.  ain't politics a bitch.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:39:18 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 149739 at http://dagblog.com The super pacs may of save http://dagblog.com/comment/149736#comment-149736 <a id="comment-149736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/michigan-santorum-country-13065">Michigan: Santorum Country</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">The super pacs may of save the day for Romney but cause damage to the general campaign later. </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:27:58 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 149736 at http://dagblog.com