dagblog - Comments for "Fracking, Drilling OK in Theory" http://dagblog.com/health/fracking-drilling-ok-theory-13109 Comments for "Fracking, Drilling OK in Theory" en In Why Not Frack? in March http://dagblog.com/comment/150355#comment-150355 <a id="comment-150355"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/health/fracking-drilling-ok-theory-13109">Fracking, Drilling OK in Theory</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In <em>Why Not Frack?</em><br /> in March 8, 2012 <em>New York Review of Books</em><br /><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/contributors/bill-mckibben/">Bill McKibben </a>reviews:</p> <p><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400068533?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thneyoreofbo-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1400068533" target="_blank">The End of Country</a><img alt="" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=thneyoreofbo-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1400068533" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" width="1" /></em><br /> by Seamus McGraw<br /> Random House, 245 pp., $26.00                                                  </p> <p><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801450160?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thneyoreofbo-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0801450160" target="_blank">Under the Surface: Fracking, Fortunes, and the Fate of the Marcellus Shale</a><img alt="" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=thneyoreofbo-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0801450160" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" width="1" /></em><br /> by Tom Wilber<br /> Cornell University Press, 272 pp., $27.95 (to be published in May 2012)                            </p> <p><em>Gasland </em><br /> a documentary film by Josh Fox<br /> Docurama, <acronym><span class="caps">DVD</span></acronym>, $29.95</p> <p>article @</p> <p><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/mar/08/why-not-frack/">http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/mar/08/why-not-frack/</a></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:44:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 150355 at http://dagblog.com Tighten fracking regulations, http://dagblog.com/comment/150226#comment-150226 <a id="comment-150226"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/health/fracking-drilling-ok-theory-13109">Fracking, Drilling OK in Theory</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/16/shale-gas-regulations-scientists-us?INTCMP=SRCH">Tighten fracking regulations, scientists urge US officials</a></p> <blockquote> An influential group of scientists has urged US officials to step up their policing of shale <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/gas" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 86, 137); background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; " title="More from guardian.co.uk on Gas">gas</a> operations and to consider stronger regulations to reduce environmental and health risks at the facilities. The scientists called on regulators to revisit, and in many cases beef up, their guidelines to avoid surface spills at shale gas works, and to ensure the safe storage and disposal of toxic fluids used in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/20/shale-gas-fracking-question-answer" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 86, 137); background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; " title="">controversial hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, operations</a>. Though some US states have updated historic oil and gas regulations to encompass fracking and shale gas work more generally, many lag behind and lack enough qualified people to enforce regulations properly, the researchers said. Writing in a major <a href="http://energy.utexas.edu/" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 86, 137); background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; " title="">report released yesterday</a>, the scientists found "little or no evidence" to support claims that fracking had contaminated aquifers, but recommended that states do more to prevent accidents, such as spillages, underground leaks and gas explosions.</blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:25:00 +0000 Donal comment 150226 at http://dagblog.com Got me thinking that it took http://dagblog.com/comment/150051#comment-150051 <a id="comment-150051"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150049#comment-150049">So the argument that frackers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Got me thinking that it took <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl">a dust bowl</a> to get North American farmers to start behaving for their own good</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:36:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 150051 at http://dagblog.com So the argument that frackers http://dagblog.com/comment/150049#comment-150049 <a id="comment-150049"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/health/fracking-drilling-ok-theory-13109">Fracking, Drilling OK in Theory</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So the argument that frackers always use is that their underground activity takes place at an extreme distance from underground aquifers.  This has always seemed a reasonable argument to me.  But, the dangers of underground drilling in any form has never been so much what happens underground as it is what happens at the surface. </p> <p>If the problem is that they cut corners at the surface, spilling chemicals, releasing extracted gasses or spilling oil, then they can't be allowed to end the argument with "but it's nowhere near the groundwater!"  These guys have had forever to get their above ground ops squared away and they haven't done it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:30:29 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 150049 at http://dagblog.com