dagblog - Comments for "It&#039;s Going To Be Complicated" http://dagblog.com/technology/its-going-be-complicated-13132 Comments for "It's Going To Be Complicated" en >Cold fusion has always been http://dagblog.com/comment/150242#comment-150242 <a id="comment-150242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150197#comment-150197">Cold fusion has always been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>&gt;<span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">Cold fusion has always been the energy of the future, and it always will be.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><font color="#222222" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span style="line-height: 17px;">The cold fusion has never been </span></font><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; "> the energy of the future it had been a debunked bad science until quite resent developments. Slowly LENR has gained creditability and now it got quite dramatic boost (last couple years). </span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:10:17 +0000 Stefan comment 150242 at http://dagblog.com >Whipple is correct that LENR http://dagblog.com/comment/150240#comment-150240 <a id="comment-150240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/technology/its-going-be-complicated-13132">It&#039;s Going To Be Complicated</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>&gt;<span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">Whipple is correct that LENR would be a game-changer. But have we really seen enough to call it viable?</span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">​Yes, we do. Other green-tech looks totally inferior comparatively with LENR; it has gained a substantial </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">creditability </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">in the last couple years. It is a bad news for one who has invested in "grassy tech" so the they try to down play it keeping "balanced" POV (as this article does). It is also true that even LENR based car is still far away but it is a certain deal, once we have a lot of money </span>channelled <span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">in LENR research with many star-ups running for the prize, the direct LENR-&gt;electricity conversion will be an ultimate solution; even with current "just-heat" output LENR will find way to the car industry it just will take longer.</span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:01:37 +0000 Stefan comment 150240 at http://dagblog.com From my article: "Hydrogen is http://dagblog.com/comment/150199#comment-150199 <a id="comment-150199"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150197#comment-150197">Cold fusion has always been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From my article: "Hydrogen is a portable way of storing energy ..."</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:17 +0000 Donal comment 150199 at http://dagblog.com Cold fusion has always been http://dagblog.com/comment/150197#comment-150197 <a id="comment-150197"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/technology/its-going-be-complicated-13132">It&#039;s Going To Be Complicated</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cold fusion has always been the energy of the future, and it always will be. Let's face facts, as a substitute for oil, it's a fantasy.</p> <p>As for hydrogen-powered cars, the fact that you're even mentioning it as a possibility means you don't understand it. Hydrogen is not an energy source. It's an energy carrier, like electricity.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:45 +0000 Ian Cooper comment 150197 at http://dagblog.com Actually the wind turbines I http://dagblog.com/comment/150189#comment-150189 <a id="comment-150189"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150168#comment-150168">Wind intermittent? Take a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually the wind turbines I see in PA aren't turning at all. So I guess that isn't intermittent.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:51:33 +0000 Donal comment 150189 at http://dagblog.com Wind intermittent? Take a http://dagblog.com/comment/150168#comment-150168 <a id="comment-150168"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/technology/its-going-be-complicated-13132">It&#039;s Going To Be Complicated</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wind intermittent? Take a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pumped-storage_hydroelectric_power_stations">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pumped-storage_hydroelectric_power_stations</a></p> <p>But that won’t matter until about 2023 when the US grid reaches 70% wind, because demand sources can load level until then.</p> <p>Check out how tight the 95% prediction confidence intervals are on this extrapolation: <a href="http://i.imgur.com/IfFoA.png">http://i.imgur.com/IfFoA.png</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:46:00 +0000 James Salsman comment 150168 at http://dagblog.com