dagblog - Comments for "Derisive Religion Mocking" http://dagblog.com/personal/dersive-religion-mocking-13135 Comments for "Derisive Religion Mocking" en How rooted, really, are our http://dagblog.com/comment/150159#comment-150159 <a id="comment-150159"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/personal/dersive-religion-mocking-13135">Derisive Religion Mocking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">How rooted, really, are our policies in the world we inhabit, as opposed to the world we imagine?</span></p> </blockquote> <p>And right here American politics, and perhaps even American culture, stand reconsidered on the prongs of the is-ought distinction.  Certainly some of our policies are based on religious superstition, but still others are based on things we insist on believing - despite the evidence - for other reasons entirely.  Maybe it's the belief that contractionary fiscal policy is expansionary.  Maybe it's the belief that the War on Drugs has some kind of positive outcome.  Maybe it's the belief that an increasingly draconian security state makes us safer.  How deep does the rabbit hole go?  Moreover, what would our policies look like if they were actually scaled against the evidence?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:06:15 +0000 DF comment 150159 at http://dagblog.com I had no idea you were into http://dagblog.com/comment/150157#comment-150157 <a id="comment-150157"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/personal/dersive-religion-mocking-13135">Derisive Religion Mocking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I had no idea you were into Scientology.</p> <p>I am afraid this puts all of your prior posts in a new light or at least light saber!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:21:48 +0000 Richard Day comment 150157 at http://dagblog.com To be fair to Kilgore, I http://dagblog.com/comment/150156#comment-150156 <a id="comment-150156"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/personal/dersive-religion-mocking-13135">Derisive Religion Mocking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To be fair to Kilgore, I think his myth-feeding remark was the minor point. His major point was that focusing on Santorum's belief in Satan <em>per se</em> misses the far more sinister element of his worldview--that those who disagree with Santorum's dogmatic ideas are Satan's pawns. That belief is not just silly, like the Destor Star Wars cult. It's scary as hell (figuratively speaking).</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:58:27 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 150156 at http://dagblog.com