dagblog - Comments for "Did Breibart Die of Too Much Vile Bile?"

Sorry for the error, Richard!

artappraiser — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:19:31 +0000

In reply to It is still there with three

Sorry for the error, Richard! For some reason, first time I saw it I didn't notice that you used "dikkday" with two k's, and I was using my browser search to check for it still being there under your old screen name there, "dickday."

Still there with 24 likes.

NCD — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:45:42 +0000

In reply to It is still there with three

Still there with 24 likes. Good job Richard.

Well thank you much

Richard Day — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:28:52 +0000

In reply to Oh my... Oh my my my... DD

Well thank you much Ducky!

Somebody cares! ha

Yup! It's still hanging on

oldenGoldenDecoy — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:04:01 +0000

In reply to It is still there with three

Yup!

It's still hanging on over there.

Some poster named Red thought it quite funny.

Plus, it currently has 19 likes.

~OGD~

Oh my... Oh my my my... DD

oldenGoldenDecoy — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:53:28 +0000

In reply to Okay Ducky, I hereby render

Oh my... Oh my my my...

DD ... It's been a long time since the last time I received the highly coveted Dayly Comment of the Day Award...

And coming from someone who stuck there tongue out at the current ongoing Friday Massacre over at TPM with what follows, makes the Dayly award even more delicious...

dikkday48@yahoo.com

I come here not to praise Breitbart

But to bury him

That Breitbart should be labeled a gadfly

Is the same as labeling Rush a gadfly

Or Coulter a gadfly

Or Beck a gadfly

Or Savage a gadfly

Or John Wilkes Booth a gadfly

Or Himmler a gadfly

Rush is no gadfly

Coulter is no gadfly

Beck is no gadfly

Savage is no gadfly

Booth was no gadfly

Himmler was no gadfly

and Breitbart was no gadfly

Socrates was a gadfly

Oliver Wendell Holmes was a gadfly

Earl Warren was a gadfly (with power)

Noam Chomsky is a gadfly

Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coultier and Michael Savage and Breitbart are no gadflies.

So bury them all and quit pretending that Breitbart had any socially redeeming values.

the end

Absolutely DD ... ABSOLUTELY...

~OGD~

It is still there with three

Richard Day — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:09:14 +0000

In reply to Your comment has been

It is still there with three comments.

Let's see!

I just replied to two

Richard Day — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:07:25 +0000

In reply to dd, excellent - sneaky too.

I just replied to two comments on TPM

lets see!

Your comment has been

artappraiser — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:55:15 +0000

In reply to I went back and resigned on

Your comment has been disappeared now (I saw it, have been refreshing to see what happened) and also gone is a comment by someone else referring to the deleted comments, though they haven't yet removed one by Chesire referring to a "Thursday Morning Masssacre arund here." (sic.) It's mildly interesting that they would put so much time and work into deleting on this one issue, as traditionally in mho TPM puts comments very low priority on the staff attention scale.

Edit to add: The volume of commenting on that thread is very high, like 20 a minute coming through while I was on it. So it's a lot of work to monitor it.

dd, excellent - sneaky too.

Aunt Sam — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:30:02 +0000

In reply to I went back and resigned on

dd, excellent - sneaky too. Gotta love that.

Did you see my 'note' above about Bain having major share in ownership in Clear Channel?

I went back and resigned on

Richard Day — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:24:14 +0000

In reply to OGD - Thought you might find

I went back and resigned on to TPM

There was a blog (paid) on rush and his misogynistic rants.

I tried to back door josh and entered an anti breitbart comment.

We shall see how far I get.

The comment was accepted as of one minute ago.

THIS REALLY PISSES ME OFF!

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/03/obama-backs-gop-into-limbaugh-shaped-corner.php