dagblog - Comments for "Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls" http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239 Comments for "Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls" en I caught this pic and I went http://dagblog.com/comment/150662#comment-150662 <a id="comment-150662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150656#comment-150656">Illustration by Bob Staake</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I caught this pic and I went nuts. hahahahaha</p> <p>Good show!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:50:43 +0000 Richard Day comment 150662 at http://dagblog.com Illustration by Bob Staake http://dagblog.com/comment/150656#comment-150656 <a id="comment-150656"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150655#comment-150655">Mitt?s Super Tuesday: Could</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="" src="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/staake-ps.fm2.jpg" style="width: 282px; height: 193px;" /></p> <p>Illustration by Bob Staake for <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/mitt-romney-super-tuesday.html">the above cited <em>New Yorker </em>article</a> <img alt="smiley" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.gif" title="smiley" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:23:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 150656 at http://dagblog.com Mitt?s Super Tuesday: Could http://dagblog.com/comment/150655#comment-150655 <a id="comment-150655"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239">Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/mitt-romney-super-tuesday.html">Mitt’s Super Tuesday: Could He Wrap Things Up?</a><br /> Posted by John Cassidy on his <em>New Yorker </em>blog, March 5, 2012<br /><br /> For weeks now, I and many others have been saying that the results of Super Tuesday won’t be decisive—that the bruising G.O.P. nomination battle is likely to drag on into May or June, and maybe even until the convention, in August.<br /><br /> On the eve of the voting in ten states, with four hundred and thirty-seven delegates at stake, an alternative scenario is looming—one that’s much more favorable to Mitt Romney. With Rick Santorum’s support seemingly falling away in many places, following his defeat in Michigan and a barrage of negative publicity about his religious views, it is now quite conceivable that Romney could do well enough for the Republican Party panjandrums, desperate to put an end to the internecine warfare, to hail him as the nominee-elect.<br /><br /> If this does happen, the primaries in other states will continue, of course; [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:13:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 150655 at http://dagblog.com Good related piece by Ryan http://dagblog.com/comment/150652#comment-150652 <a id="comment-150652"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150651#comment-150651">Pew March 5: Campaign</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good related piece by Ryan Lizza:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/03/12/120312fa_fact_lizza#ixzz1oJ3iwINS">Life of The Party: Can the G.O.P. save itself?</a><br /><em>The New Yorker,</em> March 12, 2012 issue<br /><br /> [....] The polls back up Santorum and Kabaservice’s claim. In the past ten years, as self-proclaimed conservatives have increased from sixty-two per cent of the Republican Party to seventy-one per cent, the percentage of Republicans describing themselves as moderates has declined from thirty-one per cent to twenty-three per cent. The number who call themselves “liberal” is now close to the number who describe themselves as Aleut or Eskimo.</p> <p>The shift to the right has brought new, highly energized voters into the Party, which took over the House and gained six seats in the Senate in 2010. But it has also brought risks [....]</p> <p>Political parties aren’t supposed to act suicidal. For decades, the reigning theory held that politicians, not activists, defined the parties. These politicians were rational people who cared only about winning office [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:15:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 150652 at http://dagblog.com Pew March 5: Campaign http://dagblog.com/comment/150651#comment-150651 <a id="comment-150651"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239">Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pew March 5: <em>Campaign Continues to Hurt GOP More Than It Helps</em>:</p> <p><a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/03/05/gop-race-is-rallying-democrats/">http://www.people-press.org/2012/03/05/gop-race-is-rallying-democrats/</a></p> <p>One of the charts:</p> <p><img alt="" src="http://www.people-press.org/files/2012/03/3-5-12-2.png" style="width: 294px; height: 357px;" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:02:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 150651 at http://dagblog.com Is interesting after hearing http://dagblog.com/comment/150650#comment-150650 <a id="comment-150650"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150639#comment-150639">Supplemental information from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is interesting after hearing Carville rant on Maher's show last night that Limbaugh and the establishment GOP are one and the same thing, that there isn't any other GOP left standing that could be called the party's establishment <img alt="cheeky" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/tounge_smile.gif" title="cheeky" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:00:53 +0000 artappraiser comment 150650 at http://dagblog.com Supplemental information from http://dagblog.com/comment/150639#comment-150639 <a id="comment-150639"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239">Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Supplemental information from <span style="border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font: inherit; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font: inherit; color: rgb(0, 132, 180); outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; "><a class="account-group js-account-group js-action-profile js-user-profile-link" data-user-id="61220477" href="https://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 132, 180); outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; font-family: HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">‏Twitter @ppppolls</a></span></p> <p>The Limbaugh divide- pro-Rush Ohio Republicans support Santorum 39-35. Anti-Rush ones go 39-30 for Mitt: <a href="http://t.co/aRtQYUFC">http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/03/limbaugh-and-birthers.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:05:55 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 150639 at http://dagblog.com Super Tuesday Delegate http://dagblog.com/comment/150637#comment-150637 <a id="comment-150637"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239">Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/super-tuesday-delegate-projection-update/"><span class="timestamp published" title="2012-03-05T16:11:04+00:00"><span class="date">Super Tuesday Delegate Projection Update</span></span></a></p> <p><span class="timestamp published" title="2012-03-05T16:11:04+00:00"><span class="date">By Nate Silver, </span></span><em>FiveThirtyEight </em>@ nytimes.com, <span class="timestamp published" title="2012-03-05T16:11:04+00:00"><span class="date">March 5, 2012, <em>4:11 pm</em></span></span></p> <p>There has been enough <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/santorum-slumps-in-super-tuesday-polls/">movement in the polls</a> in the past 24 hours to warrant revisiting our <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/romney-could-win-majority-of-super-tuesday-delegates/#more-27467">delegate projections from Sunday</a>. I now have Rick Santorum trailing Mitt Romney by about 150 delegates, and also falling behind Newt Gingrich, who has some favorable momentum in the delegate-rich Southern states.</p> <p>Based on the most recent polls, I’m making the following set of changes: [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:55:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 150637 at http://dagblog.com Time to change the Dagblog http://dagblog.com/comment/150634#comment-150634 <a id="comment-150634"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/santorum-slumps-super-tuesday-polls-13239">Santorum Slumps in Super Tuesday Polls</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Time to change the Dagblog headline <em>Tuesday:  Ohio Is Santorum-licious!</em> ?</p> <p>He's <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-ohio-super-tuesday-20120305,0,5123380.story">gone to whining the victimhood of campaign finance</a>, that's a strong sign of desperation from a Republican. It just couldn't be that a lot of Republican primary voters like birth control, college educations and separation of church and state, that's not in the Santorum mindset, no way that can't be it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:07:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 150634 at http://dagblog.com