dagblog - Comments for "Now Things Get Interesting" http://dagblog.com/link/now-things-get-interesting-13298 Comments for "Now Things Get Interesting" en No Headlines For Rick This http://dagblog.com/comment/151023#comment-151023 <a id="comment-151023"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/now-things-get-interesting-13298">Now Things Get Interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_03/no_headlines_for_rick_this_wee036059.php">No Headlines For Rick This Weekend</a><br /> By Ed Kilgore, <em>Political Animal</em>, March 14, 2012</p> <p>Rick Santorum would love to follow up his victories in Alabama and Mississippi yesterday with some quick, fresh triumphs, partly to offset Mitt Romney’s remoreseless progress in picking up delegates (despite the high-profile losses, Romney secured 40 delegates to Santorum’s 37 yesterday once his wins in Hawaii and American Samoa are factored in), and partly so that he doesn’t stake everything on winning in Illinois on March 20.</p> <p>But it ain’t looking good for any Santorum cheer over the weekend.</p> <p>You’d think he’d have a decent shot in Saturday’s Missouri caucuses, since he trounced Romney in the Show-Me-State’s non-binding primary back in February. But as TPM’s Eric Kleefeld <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/03/missouri-caucuses-this-saturday-wont-have-a-winner----until-april-and-june.php?ref=fpb">reported</a> today, Missouri GOP party leaders decided against holding a presidential straw poll [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:53:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 151023 at http://dagblog.com No surprise that Gary Bauer http://dagblog.com/comment/151004#comment-151004 <a id="comment-151004"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/150992#comment-150992">Polls miss evangelical surge</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No surprise that Gary Bauer is getting shivers up his leg:</p> <p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74028.html">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74028.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:46:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 151004 at http://dagblog.com Polls miss evangelical surge http://dagblog.com/comment/150992#comment-150992 <a id="comment-150992"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/now-things-get-interesting-13298">Now Things Get Interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2012/03/14/your-morning-jolt-polls-miss-evangelical-surge-in-mississippi-alabama/?cxntfid=blogs_political_insider_jim_galloway">Polls miss evangelical surge in Mississippi, Alabama | Jim Galloway | Political Insider | AJC.com</a></p> <p><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; ">On Tuesday night, Rick </span>Santorum<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; "> dashed the GOP presidential aspirations of Newt Gingrich and complicated Mitt Romney’s slog toward the Tampa convention.</span></p> <p><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; ">More than that, </span>Santorum<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; "> thwarted pollsters who had suggested a happy night for both the former U.S. House speaker and former Massachusetts governor. The culprit was a serious undercount of evangelical clout.</span></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:22:55 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 150992 at http://dagblog.com Mr. Santorum's advantage in http://dagblog.com/comment/150989#comment-150989 <a id="comment-150989"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/now-things-get-interesting-13298">Now Things Get Interesting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Mr. Santorum's advantage in the delegate count should be relatively modest: the Associated Press has called 22 delegates for him between the two states so far, versus 18 for Mitt Romney and 17 for Newt Gingrich. A number of delegates have yet to be decided in these states, but both divide their delegates in a relatively proportional way. And if Mr. Romney wins the caucuses in Hawaii and American Samoa, he could potentially take more delegates overall from the evening.</p> <p>Moreover, these were the sort of states that Mr. Romney was "supposed" to lose based on their demographics. Although the polls overestimated Mr. Romney's standing, projections based on demographic models did reasonably well.</p> <p>Mr. Romney will not have such excuses, however, if he loses Illinois, which votes a week from today. It's the only contest that evening and Mr. Romney is thought to be the favorite there, although polls and my demographic model show a <a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/fivethirtyeight/primaries/illinois">fairly tight race</a>.</p> <p>Mr. Romney will have a significant lead in delegates even if he loses Illinois. But a loss there would be more characteristic of those scenarios where he <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/09/how-daunting-is-santorums-delegate-math/">falls short of a delegate majority</a> and needs help from super delegates and other unpledged delegates to win the nomination.</p> </blockquote> <p>from <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/live-coverage-alabama-and-mississippi-primaries/#closing-out-and-looking-ahead-to-illinois">Live Coverage: Alabama and Mississippi Primaries</a></p> <p>by Nate Silver @ NYT, March 13, 11:36pm</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:05:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 150989 at http://dagblog.com