dagblog - Comments for "A Devastating Comment From The President" http://dagblog.com/politics/devasting-comment-president-13370 Comments for "A Devastating Comment From The President" en I'm just commenting on a http://dagblog.com/comment/151514#comment-151514 <a id="comment-151514"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151492#comment-151492">We&#039;ve been through this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm just commenting on a blog, I'm not making vicious comments, and I certainly don't make comments on what you say more than many others, nor do I seek you out.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 23:03:26 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 151514 at http://dagblog.com I was unclear. "The Ghetto" http://dagblog.com/comment/151506#comment-151506 <a id="comment-151506"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151452#comment-151452">I never said Gates should see</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I was unclear. "The Ghetto" is a place, not a state of mind. Skip Gates does not live there. Thus the Crowley/Gates episode is inapposite to my comment.</div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:11:45 +0000 jollyroger comment 151506 at http://dagblog.com But you're lovable, and http://dagblog.com/comment/151496#comment-151496 <a id="comment-151496"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151459#comment-151459">OMG! I make mistakes! Also,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But you're lovable, and that's what counts.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:24:52 +0000 Ramona comment 151496 at http://dagblog.com We've been through this http://dagblog.com/comment/151492#comment-151492 <a id="comment-151492"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151488#comment-151488">I just write my opinions</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We've been through this before. Our "discussions" wind up diverting the conversation and have destroyed the posts of other bloggers. Feel free to express your opinion with others. I think the other bloggers would appreciate posts being free of our often vicious exchanges. I have tried to be polite. If you persist, I will report it as harassment.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:59:31 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 151492 at http://dagblog.com I just write my opinions http://dagblog.com/comment/151488#comment-151488 <a id="comment-151488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151486#comment-151486">Please resist the urge to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just write my opinions based on what I read and what I think. Who reads them is their business.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:25:13 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 151488 at http://dagblog.com Please resist the urge to http://dagblog.com/comment/151486#comment-151486 <a id="comment-151486"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151484#comment-151484">So what would you recommend</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Please resist the urge to engage in conversation with me. We disagree on a host of issues. You are free to share your views with others. I just don't care what you think. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:51:01 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 151486 at http://dagblog.com So what would you recommend http://dagblog.com/comment/151484#comment-151484 <a id="comment-151484"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151466#comment-151466">If the police repeated treat</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So what would you recommend if a neigherbod watch Zmmerman-type got into Gates' house when he saw Gates shoulder in the door? (the 911 call did say a Hispanic man...) Would you want the police to check up on Gates' well-being -  make sure Zimmerman isn't in the kitchen with a gun, or just assume that the owner opened the door so everything is okay?</p> <p>Re: a bad hip, how do the police know for sure someone answering the door is unarmed, and how does having a bad hip prevent him from shooting?</p> <p>One interesting item I found now Googling was that the idea of "domestic disputes being the most dangerous situation for police" is actually not founded in statistics of actual danger, and results in police taking a more defensive posture for personal safety instead of a more effective strategy. </p> <p>The same book goes into whether the police help, and something like 95% of the women in Detroit who called 911 for domestic violence felt the police made the situation better. (understandably, the men often didn't think they helped, but the statistics show the arrival as lowering further violence). But it's doubtful that the overall public is aware that 95%+ women were happy with the results of reporting violence, meaning the police suffer from bad PR, and it hurts their ability to help people.</p> <p>Obviously Gates' case wasn't a domestic dispute, but the book helps to understand a bit police reactions and the complexity of the issue from their side.</p> <p><a href="http://books.google.cz/books?id=9jCJXOxKXoUC&amp;pg">http://books.google.cz/books?id=9jCJXOxKXoUC&amp;pg</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:36:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 151484 at http://dagblog.com It would be interesting to http://dagblog.com/comment/151474#comment-151474 <a id="comment-151474"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151466#comment-151466">If the police repeated treat</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It would be interesting to see if protests in Jasper, Louisiana changed police behavior. It would also be interesting to know if the behavior of the Cambridge, Mass. police force towards the black community have changed since the Gates incident. If changes in approaches to blacks by police have been made, it would support protests against aggressive police behavior as a means of changing practice. Even if police behavior didn't change, there is no reason that people should just bend to the will of an "occupying force". Protest is an American value. Protest can be in the form of a lone individual with a degenerating hip or a several thousand strong march.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:24:34 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 151474 at http://dagblog.com "Reasonable" is the key word http://dagblog.com/comment/151470#comment-151470 <a id="comment-151470"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151431#comment-151431">Except Trayvon Martin did not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Reasonable" is the key word here. But yeah, I can't seen any reasonable in this case.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:38:15 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 151470 at http://dagblog.com If this is what "stand your http://dagblog.com/comment/151469#comment-151469 <a id="comment-151469"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151424#comment-151424">One thing that remains</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; ">If this is what "stand your ground" means in practice then that law has to fall, regardless of the original intent.  "Unintended consequences" indeed.</span></p> </blockquote> <p><font color="#222222" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span style="line-height: 17px;">That was my point. The law is flawed. I'm sure that Zimmerman is flat out lying. But without witnesses, can a prosecutor prove that beyond reasonable doubt?</span></font></p> <p><span style="line-height: 17px; color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; ">I don't know enough details about how the law work holds up in court. Maybe this was simply a gross failure by the authorities. But what I read about the law suggests that the law itself has made this possible.</span></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:33:34 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 151469 at http://dagblog.com