dagblog - Comments for "If it's good for the Goose..."

It doesn't matter - Spike Lee

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:46:58 +0000

In reply to Come on, Auntie, facts have a

It doesn't matter - Spike Lee just Tweeted Bush's address as where the vigilante lives. Honest mistake, they both share the first name. Reached for comment, Lee said, "Turkeys coming home to roost".

I reckon Redstate is full of

NCD — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:14:38 +0000

In reply to I didn't make this up. I saw

I reckon Redstate is full of morally aberrant fruitcakes, might have figured. Do you still got Sadddamn's gun?

All you guys are jumping on

The Decider — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:49:21 +0000

In reply to If it's good for the Goose...

All you guys are jumping on me like I don't know anything but remember that I still have eyes and ears in the DIA, NSA, and lots of other government letters. They keep me up on where the nucular bombs are, where the terrorists are hiding, and which black guys are trying to cross through my neighborhood.

I don't know anything about

The Decider — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:41:53 +0000

In reply to Look, the bible tells me that

I don't know anything about profitable cause, but as always, you are the most logical of libs, Dick. And I love your language. I'm thinkin' of making you a honorary Texan.

I didn't make this up. I saw

The Decider — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:28:46 +0000

In reply to If Zimmerman is innocent, why

I didn't make this up. I saw it all over the comments in RedState. And personally, I'd rather be in a good ol' gunfight than to have to get sued by a woman. The jury is still out on this one. At least, it would be if there was a jury.

Come on, Auntie, facts have a

The Decider — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:26:10 +0000

In reply to Your post states: So, as

Come on, Auntie, facts have a well known liberal bias. I know that this is what happened because I feel it in my gut and a friend posted it on Facebook.

If Zimmerman is innocent, why

NCD — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:45:57 +0000

In reply to If it's good for the Goose...

If Zimmerman is innocent, why did he disappear? Where is the hospital report? Where was the police investigation until this went national? Zimmerman is 'surprised' by a guy he is following? Even in the gun slinging west it was illegal to shoot an unarmed guy cause he 'punched your nose'. Decider, killing people isn't 'sexual harassment', and resisting or reporting it does not involve guns or murder.

Only a morally aberrant fruitcake would equate women 'suing' men for harassment with this case. Is this tripe what Fox News, Rush or Hate radio is spewing, or did you make this stuff up from scratch?

Look, the bible tells me that

Richard Day — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:17:51 +0000

In reply to If it's good for the Goose...

Look, the bible tells me that a woman is suppose to sew the pants on a man, not sue the pants off a man for chrissakes.

In this case, WE are not jury!

One 'eyewitness' account does not do the trick as far as probable cause.

Remember W, a man took a gun to a skittle fight.

A jury must decide this matter.

Your post states: So, as

Aunt Sam — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:09:08 +0000

In reply to If it's good for the Goose...

Your post states:

So, as Trayvon walked up behind Mr. Zimmerman, punched him to the ground and then repeatedly beat his head into the cement, I suppose Mr. Zimmerman is at fault for not saying "Excuse me sir, but I perceive that you are a threat." Remember, liberal readers, there are eyewitness accounts, already known to the police, that support Mr. Zimmerman's story. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

The link actually reads:

The details were the most thorough yet to be revealed from Mr. Zimmerman’s point of view, and emerged on Monday as thousands were arriving in town to march and attend a meeting about the shooting and the investigation that followed. In the 911 calls that have been released, Mr. Zimmerman is heard deciding, against a dispatcher’s advice, to follow Trayvon, whom he deemed “up to no good.”

What eye witness accounts? Have you heard/read them?

You are asserting not facts, but conjecture based on facts not in evidence.

What was your intent in writing/posting this and what FACTS/first hand knowledge did you utilize as the foundation for your thesis?