dagblog - Comments for "Santorum Invokes the &quot;Real Republican&quot; Defense" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/santorum-invokes-real-republican-defense-13395 Comments for "Santorum Invokes the "Real Republican" Defense" en and Obama will be the Kenyan http://dagblog.com/comment/151750#comment-151750 <a id="comment-151750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151693#comment-151693">This is a surprise? ...and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>and Obama will be the Keny</em><em>an socialist usurper</em></p> <p>Nah (that would be Newt,) and it looks like Mitt's going to go with the Ronald Reagan vs. Jimmy Carter thing--see the last graph:</p> <div id="art-mast"> <blockquote> <div class="translateHead"> <h1> <span style="font-size:13px;"><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/27/bowing_to_the_kremlin" title="Bowing to the Kremlin">Bowing to the Kremlin</a></span></h1> <h2> <span style="font-size:13px;">Why Obama's "hot mic" diplomacy is endangering America.</span></h2> </div> <h3> <span style="font-size:13px;"><span id="by-line">BY MITT ROMNEY</span> <span id="byline-pubdate-separator">|</span> <span id="pub-date">MARCH 27, 2012</span></span></h3> </blockquote> </div> <p>The Carter thing occurred to me before this with what I read about the administration scrambling on the gas prices issue; I think Mitt's team is betting/hoping on high oil/gas prices tied up with the Iran sanctions/pressures occurring at the right time for them, and the Obama team likewise is worried about that.</p> <p>Edit to add: March 28 Foreign Policy published a response letter to Mitt's op-ed above from the Obama campaign's foreign policy advisor team, here:</p> <p><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/28/an_open_letter_to_mitt_romney_explain_your_national_security_ideas">http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/28/an_open_letter_to_mitt_...</a></p> <p>(Among the signatory names I note that Gen. Wesley Clark is still a supporter....)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:41:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 151750 at http://dagblog.com This is a surprise? ...and http://dagblog.com/comment/151693#comment-151693 <a id="comment-151693"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/santorum-invokes-real-republican-defense-13395">Santorum Invokes the &quot;Real Republican&quot; Defense</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is a surprise? ...and when a Republican gets the nod this summer they will be the <a href="http://voices.yahoo.com/sarah-palins-real-american-stories-air-fox-news-5743270.html">Real American</a> and Obama will be the Kenyan socialist usurper. More poop into gold from the GOP.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:23:52 +0000 NCD comment 151693 at http://dagblog.com Republicans on what it takes http://dagblog.com/comment/151691#comment-151691 <a id="comment-151691"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151686#comment-151686">Yeah, Somerby goes on about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Republicans on what it takes to be Republican:</p> <p>Santorum: for family values and all that "bullshit"; extending the rights of the unborn to pre-conception</p> <p>Rick Perry: having God tell you you should be Prez; thinking God is a Texan and loves expensive oil</p> <p>Romney: for health care before he was against it</p> <p>Bush: for social security lock box and balanced budget before he was against it</p> <p>John Yoo: for the Consitution before he found a hole in it; shifting <em>habeas corpus</em> to <em>torturous corpus</em></p> <p>Judge Roy Moore: faithfully upholding the law... of Leviticus</p> <p>Dick Cheney: had to violate government security to save it, setting up own branch of government when needed</p> <p>Hermann Cain: treating rabbits and goldfish better than women, knocking 'em down like Dominos</p> <p>Newt Gingrich: being open with your wives (and other people's wives)</p> <p>James O'Keefe: having pimp fantasies tied up with (anti-)social issues and occasional Rohypnol</p> <p>Bill O'Reilly: limit female access to contraception and replace it with loofa mitts and falafel "things"</p> <p>Rush Limbaugh: shift health care funding from sluts on The Pill &amp; RU-486 to funding junkie talk show hosts on Viagra &amp; OxyContin</p> <p>Sarah Palin: aggressively cutting government payrolls, including your own elected position; National bus tours across the state of Alaska (in full sight of Russia)</p> <p>Tea Party: hey! who squealed?</p> <p>Paul Ryan: wantonly cutting the budget to balance the budget</p> <p>Grover Norquist: wantingly cutting the budget to eliminate the budget</p> <p>Lindsay Graham: making Defense the 4th branch of government</p> <p>John McCain: thinking it already is, and he's General-in-Chief; Afghanistan  4evuh.</p> <p>The Supreme Court: no personal rights unturned</p> <p>Andrew Breitbart: more than a lifetime being obnoxious</p> <p>Michelle Bachman: teaching people carbon dioxide's good for them; re-interpreting and re-locating the founding fathers</p> <p>Bonus:</p> <p>Q: why should we have voted Palin into the White House? </p> <p>A: we would have quit Iraq &amp; Afghanistan within 2 weeks</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:10:42 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 151691 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, Somerby goes on about http://dagblog.com/comment/151686#comment-151686 <a id="comment-151686"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151653#comment-151653">OK, I took out Zimmerman. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, Somerby goes on about<a href="http://dailyhowler.blogspot.com/2012/03/who-needs-journalism-odonnells-new-role.html"> "whatever"</a> today as well</p> <p>I like these gloves-off fights where everything's fair whether it's true or not.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:39:57 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 151686 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, but that was only for http://dagblog.com/comment/151676#comment-151676 <a id="comment-151676"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151662#comment-151662">Didn&#039;t Norman Mailer and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, but that was only for Mayor of NYC and City Council President, not (gasp) President.  I still think Mailer and Breslin were right and that New York City should secede from the rest of New York State.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:40:24 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 151676 at http://dagblog.com considering how well things http://dagblog.com/comment/151665#comment-151665 <a id="comment-151665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151652#comment-151652">Appears to me that Santorum</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">considering how well things worked out for Quayle and Agnew... Go, Rick, go! </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:32:32 +0000 jollyroger comment 151665 at http://dagblog.com Is spring training almost http://dagblog.com/comment/151663#comment-151663 <a id="comment-151663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/santorum-invokes-real-republican-defense-13395">Santorum Invokes the &quot;Real Republican&quot; Defense</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is spring training almost over?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:29:11 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 151663 at http://dagblog.com Didn't Norman Mailer and http://dagblog.com/comment/151662#comment-151662 <a id="comment-151662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151650#comment-151650">&quot;The public use of an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Didn't Norman Mailer and Jimmy Breslin get there first ?</div></div></div> Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:28:54 +0000 jollyroger comment 151662 at http://dagblog.com OK, I took out Zimmerman. I http://dagblog.com/comment/151653#comment-151653 <a id="comment-151653"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/151643#comment-151643">Romney: his problem is not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OK, I took out Zimmerman. I was concerned that it was in poor taste anyway. As for the rest...whatever.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:55:13 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 151653 at http://dagblog.com Appears to me that Santorum http://dagblog.com/comment/151652#comment-151652 <a id="comment-151652"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/santorum-invokes-real-republican-defense-13395">Santorum Invokes the &quot;Real Republican&quot; Defense</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Appears to me that Santorum is clearly working hard to fill the culture warrior shoes of  those that have gone before him: Dan Quayle and Spiro Agnew. The more attention the left can give him, the better he can serve.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:48:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 151652 at http://dagblog.com