dagblog - Comments for "Pistol Whippin&#039;" http://dagblog.com/politics/pistol-whippin-13449 Comments for "Pistol Whippin'" en Did you just mention "going http://dagblog.com/comment/152150#comment-152150 <a id="comment-152150"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152058#comment-152058">Besides, the sarcasm is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did you just mention "going postal?" Heh.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:06:50 +0000 SleepinJeezus comment 152150 at http://dagblog.com The man was a beacon to us http://dagblog.com/comment/152128#comment-152128 <a id="comment-152128"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152119#comment-152119">Fosse!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The man was a beacon to us all...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:46:14 +0000 jollyroger comment 152128 at http://dagblog.com Fosse! http://dagblog.com/comment/152119#comment-152119 <a id="comment-152119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152103#comment-152103">I can have more than one,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fosse!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:45:11 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 152119 at http://dagblog.com Ah, yes, was it not Plato http://dagblog.com/comment/152112#comment-152112 <a id="comment-152112"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152111#comment-152111">I&#039;d say that 2A and 44 state</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah, yes, was it not Plato himself (The Republic...) who first drew this analogy?</p> <p>(For the irony impaired, a veritable flock of whom have suddenly found dagblog, you, sir, are out your fuckin mind!--also, ignorant, and forensically disabled...)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 04:06:51 +0000 jollyroger comment 152112 at http://dagblog.com I'd say that 2A and 44 state http://dagblog.com/comment/152111#comment-152111 <a id="comment-152111"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/pistol-whippin-13449">Pistol Whippin&#039;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd say that 2A and 44 state constitution corollaries trump all attempts at limiting any right to keep and bear arms by ANY political entity.</p> <p>What has been forgotten/ignored is that the US Constitution, with the Bill of Rights is the law of the land, ratified by the several states either when it was adopted, or upon their entry into the Union.</p> <p>In answer to the comment about the people in a community deciding that they don't want guns: BS! Most likely such ordnance was passed by those in the political majority at the time, perhaps by slight of hand, or midnight back room deals.</p> <p>That is also why the Constitution limits the powers of any government to disarm the populace, or to stifle Assembly, or Speech, etc. The purpose is to keep the Majority from limiting the guaranteed freedoms of any Minority.</p> <p>A "Democracy" is best illustrated by 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner; in a "Republic", the sheep is armed.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:53:35 +0000 Mike_S comment 152111 at http://dagblog.com I can have more than one, http://dagblog.com/comment/152103#comment-152103 <a id="comment-152103"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152074#comment-152074">That would be my wife.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I <strong>can</strong> have more than one, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;feature=endscreen&amp;v=6rv4IvjaC78">right?</a></p> <p>True fact: I took Jennifer (Nairn-Smith) from the clip out a coupla times....eat your hearts out, fellas!</p> <p> </p> <p>Vulgarian, huh?  Ya got that right...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 02:07:00 +0000 jollyroger comment 152103 at http://dagblog.com That would be my wife. http://dagblog.com/comment/152074#comment-152074 <a id="comment-152074"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152073#comment-152073">Shall we guess Donal&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That would be my wife.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:12:40 +0000 Donal comment 152074 at http://dagblog.com Shall we guess Donal's http://dagblog.com/comment/152073#comment-152073 <a id="comment-152073"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152071#comment-152071">Awww, they were made for each</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Shall we guess Donal's soulmate?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:02:11 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 152073 at http://dagblog.com That doesn't mean state http://dagblog.com/comment/152072#comment-152072 <a id="comment-152072"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152070#comment-152070">What should seem obvious is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>That doesn't mean state legislatures are pretty - it's the combination of individual, state and federal that improves our immunity. The Founding Fathers were right.</p> </blockquote> <p>Doesn't seem like I was romanticizing. Should have included state AG's and courts in the mix. Eric Schneidermann also helped push back against mortgage fraud, before he was co-opted.</p> <p>Whether Spitzer succeeded or not, he did play a role of watchdog in the mix. And local people still pay more attention to details in Albany than the tsunami of legislation and lobbying in Washington.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:00:44 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 152072 at http://dagblog.com Awww, they were made for each http://dagblog.com/comment/152071#comment-152071 <a id="comment-152071"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152062#comment-152062">His eyes wide open!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Awww, they were made for each other.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:56:15 +0000 Donal comment 152071 at http://dagblog.com