dagblog - Comments for "The Political Path to Full Employment" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/political-path-full-employment-13471 Comments for "The Political Path to Full Employment" en There is a psychology of http://dagblog.com/comment/152297#comment-152297 <a id="comment-152297"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152294#comment-152294">I think Krugman&#039;s point is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>There is a psychology of spending when inflation is higher.</em></p> <p>Yes, that's part of his argument.  But I linked to a paper in the post that argues the psychology might not be what he thinks it is.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:44:50 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 152297 at http://dagblog.com I think Krugman's point is http://dagblog.com/comment/152294#comment-152294 <a id="comment-152294"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/political-path-full-employment-13471">The Political Path to Full Employment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think Krugman's point is we're in the Japanese stagflation phase where the gov has to pay banks to take money, the days of gloom.</p> <p>A bit more heat in the economy would loosen up cash flow and tilt people towards investment. The current interbank lending rate is 0.12% to 0.17%. So on a million bucks, that's $1700. Why even bother getting out of bed?</p> <p>There is a psychology of spending when inflation is higher. I don't think he's proposing 10% inflation - we were only above 3% for 8 months last year and now we've dropped back below, and it does dampen overall expectations of economic growth and risk taking. The retail sector was the hardest hit for employment the last month as well.</p> <p>I don't pretend to understand this area well, but I think I get what he's expressing.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:34:20 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 152294 at http://dagblog.com Wow! Never thought I'd see http://dagblog.com/comment/152181#comment-152181 <a id="comment-152181"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/political-path-full-employment-13471">The Political Path to Full Employment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica">Wow!  Never thought I'd see the day that...  well...  that folks would be so stoked to drink the cool-aid like you do!</p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px"> </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica">The subject of " Economics" is,  in the first place a complete bs story... I mean... not a science,  not a real thing either.    </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px"> </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica">If you don't know what I meant by that: above...  maybe you won't get it.... you won't ever get it if you agree with the "economics proffessors,  and their phony psuedo....  thing.  I wouldn't even stoop to give them that it is any kind of "science"...  not that,  nor is it an authentic effort to understand things...  that are the constituents of what is our world/  and the way things are bought and sold.</p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px"> </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica">What might be a good answer to the problems...  would be an honest to god good man in the White house,  who really gave some what of a damn....  And with the new powers:  ( "executive powers"   such as the "unitary president" type powers...  well good luck if there is ever a president again... who would dare to use those new fangled "powers"  for some good.!!!!!</p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px"> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 08 Apr 2012 01:02:00 +0000 geoshmoe3 comment 152181 at http://dagblog.com krugman looks like a chipmunk http://dagblog.com/comment/152138#comment-152138 <a id="comment-152138"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/political-path-full-employment-13471">The Political Path to Full Employment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>krugman looks like a chipmunk to me...  I think he is a nice little guy,,,  a chipmunk...</p> <p>So we got squirrels on our side,  and they got godzillas on their side...  </p> <p>They got worse than godzillas...  they got the vampires too!    This is supposed to be humorous... but not really.</p> <p> </p> <p>Geo</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:27:03 +0000 geoshmoe3 comment 152138 at http://dagblog.com Agree. If inflation was the http://dagblog.com/comment/152131#comment-152131 <a id="comment-152131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/political-path-full-employment-13471">The Political Path to Full Employment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agree. If inflation was the route to prosperity and high employment, Zimbabwe would be a job engine, and Germany, with low inflation, would not have low unemployment. Any gain by making debt inflate away, would be offset by ever rising prices.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:47:35 +0000 NCD comment 152131 at http://dagblog.com