dagblog - Comments for "Official: Charges coming in Trayvon Martin death" http://dagblog.com/link/official-charges-coming-trayvon-martin-death-13533 Comments for "Official: Charges coming in Trayvon Martin death" en How come they talk about http://dagblog.com/comment/152460#comment-152460 <a id="comment-152460"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152456#comment-152456">NCD is correct about the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How come they talk about manslaughter with a gun?</p> <p><a href="http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/involuntary-manslaughter/florida/">http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/involuntary-manslaughter/florida/</a></p> <p>I think you're confusing committing *another* crime while handling a gun.</p> <p>For example, robbery. Then the charge goes up.</p> <p>When the crime *is* the shooting, how does it go up?</p> <p>It would be hard to say Zimmerman approaching Martin is a crime, unless you can prove assault and battery.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:16:42 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 152460 at http://dagblog.com NCD is correct about the http://dagblog.com/comment/152456#comment-152456 <a id="comment-152456"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152443#comment-152443">I thought the prosecutor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">NCD is correct about the statute. It has to be second degree murder when it involves a gun. I hope they keep the trial on the east side of the state and don't bring it over to the Tampa bay area. The Casey Anthony trial picked the jury from here and sequestered the jury in Orlando. It is something to.watch.for as they go to trial.</div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:33:35 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 152456 at http://dagblog.com BMaz at EmptyWheel was also http://dagblog.com/comment/152455#comment-152455 <a id="comment-152455"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152443#comment-152443">I thought the prosecutor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>BMaz at EmptyWheel was also astounded at the 2nd degree murder charge rather than manslaughter - thinks it will be difficult.</p> <p>Here's his original post explaining where he thought the prosecutor was going,</p> <p><a href="http://www.emptywheel.net/2012/04/11/why-florida-is-charging-zimmerman-directly-instead-of-by-grand-jury/">http://www.emptywheel.net/2012/04/11/why-florida-is-charging-zimmerman-d...</a></p> <p> plus his reference to a great explanation at Volokhian Conspiracy of what Stand Your Ground is (hint: it's far from what we seem to assume)</p> <p><a href="http://volokh.com/2012/03/27/floridas-self-defense-laws/">http://volokh.com/2012/03/27/floridas-self-defense-laws/</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:17:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 152455 at http://dagblog.com I did read that, double A. http://dagblog.com/comment/152453#comment-152453 <a id="comment-152453"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152431#comment-152431">I am going to refrain to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I did read that, double A.  But thanks for reminding me to apply it. :)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:27:47 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 152453 at http://dagblog.com It may be the "if a firearm http://dagblog.com/comment/152450#comment-152450 <a id="comment-152450"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152438#comment-152438">That is apparently in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It may be the "if a firearm is used" part of the Florida law is the OK, let everyone have a gun, but if they use it for crime we will hit them hard, which then magically results in less use of guns by criminals (who are of course, well educated on the legal details of firearm use).</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:37:05 +0000 NCD comment 152450 at http://dagblog.com I thought the prosecutor http://dagblog.com/comment/152443#comment-152443 <a id="comment-152443"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152426#comment-152426">My worry is that the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought the prosecutor seems a little batshit too Des, only my opinion was formed because she said something to the effect of: "Please keep prayin' for us around the country so we can win our case." Prayer, you'd better more than that with you to win this case.</p> <p>I have no idea if second degree is over-reach or not, I would love to see the evidence the prosecutor has tho'.  I hope her charge sticks.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:28:53 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 152443 at http://dagblog.com That is apparently in http://dagblog.com/comment/152438#comment-152438 <a id="comment-152438"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152428#comment-152428">In Florida. use of a gun</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That is apparently in conflict with the self-defense law. My thought when answering though, was that manslaughter was a more appropriate charge based on what I think I know about the case with enough confidence to vote for conviction if I was on a jury. Of course if I was on a jury and heard all the evidence that is actually available I might go further one way or the other.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:07:39 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 152438 at http://dagblog.com I am going to refrain to http://dagblog.com/comment/152431#comment-152431 <a id="comment-152431"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152426#comment-152426">My worry is that the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am going to refrain to opine on that as all I know is from legal TV shows and movies (I include big "trials of  the century" as TV shows <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /> ) and that this kind of thing is often a tactical choice</p> <p>Speaking of "trials of the century," didya see the "Three Centuries of New York Scandal" issue of <em>New York Magazine</em> last week? There was a lot of thought provoking stuff in it from guest writers.</p> <p><a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/scandals/jean-harris-2012-4/">This from Nora Ephron, on the Scarsdale Diet Doctor case</a>, really struck me as crystal clear pop-culture wisdom:</p> <blockquote> <p>This is how it is with great murders: At the very beginning, you know only the basic outline, the tabloid headline on the first-day story; so you have the maximum ability to apply your theories, your insights, your own particular life lessons—in short, your narcissism—to what happened. Every murder is a Rorschach, and the Rorschach is at its most powerful before you know too much, before the inconvenient facts get in the way, before the people involved turn out to be people after all.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:42:44 +0000 artappraiser comment 152431 at http://dagblog.com Maybe it gives them room to http://dagblog.com/comment/152429#comment-152429 <a id="comment-152429"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152427#comment-152427">I think so.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe it gives them room to plea bargain.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:31:09 +0000 Donal comment 152429 at http://dagblog.com In Florida. use of a gun http://dagblog.com/comment/152428#comment-152428 <a id="comment-152428"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/152427#comment-152427">I think so.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In Florida.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter"> use of a gun </a>apparently precludes charges of manslaughter, it raises the degree:</p> <p>(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter">Wiki, Manslaughter</a>) - (under Florida statute)....Also, under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-20-Life">10-20-Life </a>system, if a firearm is used in any way then the penalty will be raised to the next degree.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-3"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a></sup></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:30:30 +0000 NCD comment 152428 at http://dagblog.com