dagblog - Comments for "Shouldn&#039;t the Ronulans be poised to seize Americans Elect?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/should-ronulans-be-poised-seize-americans-elect-13633 Comments for "Shouldn't the Ronulans be poised to seize Americans Elect?" en I actually thought Huntsman http://dagblog.com/comment/153264#comment-153264 <a id="comment-153264"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153253#comment-153253">Huntsman is an appealing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> I actually thought <a href-="">Huntsman</a> would do better with the Pugs than he did...you cannot go broke lo-balling the character and <a href="http://dagblog.com/node/8024">brainpower</a> of the Repugnant primary voter...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:31:32 +0000 jollyroger comment 153264 at http://dagblog.com The moemoe ticket: http://dagblog.com/comment/153263#comment-153263 <a id="comment-153263"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153258#comment-153258">I agree. I don&#039;t see any</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The moemoe ticket:</p> <p> </p> <p>Shuler(D)/Ayotte(R)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:26:02 +0000 jollyroger comment 153263 at http://dagblog.com I agree. I don't see any http://dagblog.com/comment/153258#comment-153258 <a id="comment-153258"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153253#comment-153253">Huntsman is an appealing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I agree. I don't see any Democrat Lady worth her salt on a ticket like that. Women have now figured out how to shake the tree of politics so their needs are taken serious and will vote according. This is a very broad sisterhood, much larger than Paul's army of pot heads. I think if Santorum gets to make a speech at Tampa, it will have a larger effect on the outcome then Paul's support. </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:30:35 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 153258 at http://dagblog.com Huntsman is an appealing http://dagblog.com/comment/153253#comment-153253 <a id="comment-153253"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153250#comment-153250">well, no. I think the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Huntsman is an appealing person, obviously smart. I like him. As a candidate, though, he struck out with Republicans of nearly all stripes. </p> <p>I find it hard to imagine any <em>prominent</em> Democratic woman hooking up with him, ending her political career.</p> <p>My guess is Huntsman would draw more votes from Romney than from Obama, but that's just a guess. In that scenario, I think Obama still wins.</p> <p>Thanks for clarifying.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:44:33 +0000 acanuck comment 153253 at http://dagblog.com well, no. I think the http://dagblog.com/comment/153250#comment-153250 <a id="comment-153250"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153246#comment-153246">Help me figure out what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>well, no.</p> <p> </p> <p>I think the americans elect ticket will be huntsman and some democratic woman, per their rules.</p> <p> </p> <p>Some guy named Ackerman is walking point on   the money.</p> <p> </p> <p>I don't actually foresee any electoral votes other than for  the tweedles, altho intra state pluralities may be nudged.</p> <p> </p> <p>certainly no House Hi-jinks. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:09:03 +0000 jollyroger comment 153250 at http://dagblog.com And aside from Friedman, what http://dagblog.com/comment/153249#comment-153249 <a id="comment-153249"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153247#comment-153247">If Romney were smarter or</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And aside from Friedman, what are the names behind Americans Elect? Where is the money? The candidates? What's the ticket? Paul-Bloomberg? Bloomberg-Friedman? I thought we'd already disposed of this third-party nonsense.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:57:32 +0000 acanuck comment 153249 at http://dagblog.com If Romney were smarter or http://dagblog.com/comment/153247#comment-153247 <a id="comment-153247"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153246#comment-153246">Help me figure out what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If Romney were smarter or bolder than he is, he'd make Paul his running mate. Then things might get interesting. But Obama would still win.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:49:20 +0000 acanuck comment 153247 at http://dagblog.com Help me figure out what http://dagblog.com/comment/153246#comment-153246 <a id="comment-153246"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/should-ronulans-be-poised-seize-americans-elect-13633">Shouldn&#039;t the Ronulans be poised to seize Americans Elect?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Help me figure out what you're musing about here, jolly. You don't appear to fear that Ron Paul will somehow snatch the Republican nomination, but that a third party will coalesce around him, and this will somehow appeal to crazies like yourself on both the left and the right. Paul will win enough states to deny Obama an electoral-college majority, throwing the choice of president to Congress. Do I have that much right? You're smoking bad stuff, man. All but two states are winner-take-all. Their electoral votes will go to either Obama or Romney. Where Paul does do surprisingly well, he'll simply cut into Romney's support -- and that state will go to Obama. If he does win a single state,it will be one that normally goes Republican. Obama landslide. End of story. </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:46:26 +0000 acanuck comment 153246 at http://dagblog.com But I have been made. mad. http://dagblog.com/comment/153232#comment-153232 <a id="comment-153232"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153231#comment-153231">me</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">But I have been made. mad.</div></div></div> Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:39:28 +0000 jollyroger comment 153232 at http://dagblog.com me http://dagblog.com/comment/153231#comment-153231 <a id="comment-153231"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153220#comment-153220">Personally I don&#039;t see Ron</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">me</div></div></div> Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:37:51 +0000 jollyroger comment 153231 at http://dagblog.com