http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647 Comments for "Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger" en http://dagblog.com/comment/187413#comment-187413 <a id="comment-187413"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Times New Roman', helvetica, arial; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175785/tomgram%3A_dahr_jamail%2C_the_climate_change_scorecard/#more">methane vents up to 150 kilometers across. A scientist on a research ship in the area described this as a bubbling as far as the eye can see in which the seawater looks like a vast pool of seltzer. Between the summers of 2010 and 2011, in fact, scientists found that in the course of a year methane vents only 30 centimeters across had grown a kilometer wide, a 3,333% increase and an example of the non-linear rapidity with which parts of the planet are responding to climate disruption.</a></span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:51:30 +0000 Anonymous JR comment 187413 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/172074#comment-172074 <a id="comment-172074"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>West Antarctica Warming Faster Than Thought, Study Finds</p> <p> </p> <p><a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www-nc.nytimes.com/2012/12/24/science/earth/west-antarctica-warming-faster-than-thought-study-finds.html?=hp&amp;_r=6&amp;">http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www-nc.nytimes.com/201...</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:14:23 +0000 jollyroger comment 172074 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/169327#comment-169327 <a id="comment-169327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Higher:<a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/11/03/us/03reuters-storm-sandy-hospitals.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;hp"> "We were confident we could withstand a (storm) surge of approximately 12 feet," but it was at least a foot higher.</a></div></div></div> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:05:36 +0000 jollyroger comment 169327 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/159792#comment-159792 <a id="comment-159792"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/Global-Warming-s-Terrifyin-by-Bill-McKibben-120720-931.html">we are on track for an 11 degree rise-waterworld level sea rise.</a></div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:28:23 +0000 jollyroger comment 159792 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/158443#comment-158443 <a id="comment-158443"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www10.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/us/storms-leave-2-million-without-power.html?_r=5&amp;hp">Are we getting the picture yet, you fuckin' Red State yahoos?</a></div></div></div> Sat, 30 Jun 2012 23:01:10 +0000 jollyroger comment 158443 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/153548#comment-153548 <a id="comment-153548"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153542#comment-153542">On the other hand, things</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The slight postponement of the apocalypse would be comforting if we were not at the very nibbbling temporal edge of the process.</p> <p> </p> <p>Wait, therefor, six months and we will be ahead of the worst case scenario before last...or sumpin like that....</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 May 2012 22:26:08 +0000 jollyroger comment 153548 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/153544#comment-153544 <a id="comment-153544"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153542#comment-153542">On the other hand, things</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But in disaster porn, it is always <em>at least</em> as bad as the worst-case scenario.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 May 2012 19:08:41 +0000 Donal comment 153544 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/153542#comment-153542 <a id="comment-153542"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On the other hand, things <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/03/sea-level-rises-greenland-glaciers">aren't as bad as the worst-case scenario</a>. (It really makes me wonder if the reporter doesn't understand the concept of "worst-case scenario". By definition, scientists didn't <em>expect</em> things to be as bad as the <em>worst</em>-case scenario.)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 May 2012 18:44:00 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 153542 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/153492#comment-153492 <a id="comment-153492"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153432#comment-153432">Don&#039;t worry, the 3% of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The story is becoming the denial, at last, so there may be the start of a shift.</p> <p> </p> <p>Way too late to actually keep us anywhere under 350 ppm of carbon dioxide...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 May 2012 05:14:15 +0000 jollyroger comment 153492 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/153432#comment-153432 <a id="comment-153432"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/standard-global-warming-models-debunked-truth-sooner-higher-drier-stronger-13647">Standard Global Warming Models debunked. Truth: Sooner, Higher, Drier, Stronger</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't worry, the 3% of climate scientists who disagree with the prevailing theory and have had their theories toppled by more recent data, now say that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/science/earth/clouds-effect-on-climate-change-is-last-bastion-for-dissenters.html">clouds</a> will save us.</p> <p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/olga-bonfiglio/climate-change-denial_1_b_1404412.html">non-scientist deniers</a> will not be influenced by any new scientific data.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 May 2012 16:23:31 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 153432 at http://dagblog.com