dagblog - Comments for "David Barton is a liar - this is what Thomas Jefferson really wanted" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/david-baron-liar-what-thomas-jefferson-really-wanted-13687 Comments for "David Barton is a liar - this is what Thomas Jefferson really wanted" en Plinkety-plink! Not http://dagblog.com/comment/153653#comment-153653 <a id="comment-153653"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153647#comment-153647">Give me a plinkin break. [New</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Plinkety-plink!  Not Jefferson!  Walter was the dumb waiter!  (sigh) Man, you miss one day of writing class and no-one understands your comedic syntax.  Frankly, I blame it all on Ronald Reagan who cut syntaxes on the upper 1%.  Instead of detailed speeches on reforming the tax code, Reagan just said, "Taxes bad," and soon the entire upper crust was indulging in so many syns you couldn't count them on two hands and one foot ... if that was your idea of a good time.  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 23:21:15 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 153653 at http://dagblog.com Unfortunately, he was also http://dagblog.com/comment/153649#comment-153649 <a id="comment-153649"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153648#comment-153648">I must have run across this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Unfortunately, he was also peddling this on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart fairly recently (I think within the last week), and Stewart let him get away with most of it. I really like Stewart, but I think when dealing with issues of religion, he's way out of his element.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 21:33:52 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 153649 at http://dagblog.com I must have run across this http://dagblog.com/comment/153648#comment-153648 <a id="comment-153648"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/david-baron-liar-what-thomas-jefferson-really-wanted-13687">David Barton is a liar - this is what Thomas Jefferson really wanted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I must have run across this idiot on cable but I really am unfamiliar with him and hope that condition remains as is.</p> <p>Wiki tells me:</p> <p>Barton holds no formal credentials in history or law, and scholars dispute the accuracy and integrity of his assertions about history, accusing him of practicing misleading <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism_%28negationism%29" title="Historical revisionism (negationism)">historical revisionism</a>, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudohistory" title="Pseudohistory">pseudoscholarship</a>" and "outright falsehoods"</p> <p>I suppose his point is that school just fucks up your mind anyway.</p> <p>He and beckerhead and rusho shunned opportunities at educational institutions.</p> <p>I suppose the lack of formal education helped them vent their prejudices without remorse; made life more black and white (so to speak) and evidently made them a lot of money.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 21:24:39 +0000 Richard Day comment 153648 at http://dagblog.com Give me a plinkin break. [New http://dagblog.com/comment/153647#comment-153647 <a id="comment-153647"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153645#comment-153645">Brilliant reporting, as</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Give me a plinkin break. [New non-cussword] Thomas Jefferson was <u><strong>not </strong></u>named Walter, at least not in my Texas schoolbook, which was fur shure the bestest available anywhere in Texas. [Cat fur is for kitten britches but fur shure is the straight skinny.] Those books are gettin' way too politically correct, though. The latest addition of that text calls him a "Floundering Father", says he had a 'slow connection,' but I don't think his skills as a fisherman are relevant to a true understanding of his place in history like we got in the good old days when boats were made of wood and men were made of steal. </p> <p> Educashun, bleh, just raises too many questions. KISS is my favorite acronym. Says it all for me.  'Keep it stupid, stupid.'</p> <p> The South will rise again. And Again. And...</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 21:13:01 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 153647 at http://dagblog.com Brilliant reporting, as http://dagblog.com/comment/153645#comment-153645 <a id="comment-153645"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/david-baron-liar-what-thomas-jefferson-really-wanted-13687">David Barton is a liar - this is what Thomas Jefferson really wanted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brilliant reporting, as usual, Mr. Wolfrum.  Although I admit I was shocked to learn that the former host of Family Feud, Richard Dawkins, was an atheist.</p> <p>And that Thomas Paine sure had a lot of common sense, didn't he?  I hear he knew Joan Rivers in the biblical sense, which is the one sense even an atheist embraces from the bible.</p> <p>Did you know that Thomas Jefferson once made an elephant disappear using only a dumbwaiter ... he was named Walter ... but never mind that.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 20:29:48 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 153645 at http://dagblog.com ADAMS was the actual inventor http://dagblog.com/comment/153644#comment-153644 <a id="comment-153644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/153643#comment-153643">Correction: Although it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ADAMS was the actual inventor of the term LOL, which came as he retweeted Jefferson's comment. Which just goes to show, for those paying attention, that Jefferson &gt;&gt;&gt; Adams.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 20:04:12 +0000 Qnonymous comment 153644 at http://dagblog.com Correction: Although it is http://dagblog.com/comment/153643#comment-153643 <a id="comment-153643"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/david-baron-liar-what-thomas-jefferson-really-wanted-13687">David Barton is a liar - this is what Thomas Jefferson really wanted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Correction: Although it is commonly said that Thomas Jefferson was the first person to ever use the term "LOL," this is untrue, and a slur on the man.</p> <p>The <strong>actual</strong> Jefferson quote was far more eloquent, "Mitt Romney for President? LMFAO."</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 05 May 2012 19:59:52 +0000 Qnonymous comment 153643 at http://dagblog.com