dagblog - Comments for "Drones!" http://dagblog.com/link/drones-13916 Comments for "Drones!" en UN investigator: U.S. dodging http://dagblog.com/comment/157671#comment-157671 <a id="comment-157671"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/drones-13916">Drones!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57457291/un-investigator-u.s-dodging-questions-on-drones/">UN investigator: U.S. dodging questions on drones</a></p> <p><em>Associated Press</em>, June 20, 2012</p> <p>GENEVA - A U.N. human rights expert accused the U.S. government Wednesday of sidestepping his questions on its use of armed drones to carry out targeted killings overseas.</p> <p>Christof Heyns, the U.N.'s independent investigator on extrajudicial killings, had asked the United States to lay out the legal basis and accountability procedures for the use of armed drones. He also wanted the U.S. to publish figures on the number of civilians killed in drone strikes against suspected terror leaders in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.</p> <p>After a two-day "interactive dialogue" with U.S. officials at the United Nations in Geneva, Heyns said he was still waiting for a satisfactory reply [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:17:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 157671 at http://dagblog.com An Embassy Asks, Drones or http://dagblog.com/comment/157670#comment-157670 <a id="comment-157670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/drones-13916">Drones!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-an-embassy-asks-drones-or-diplomacy/2012/06/20/gJQATkuJrV_story.html">An Embassy Asks, Drones or Diplomacy?</a></p> <p>By David Ignatius, <em>Washington Post</em> Op-Ed, June 20, 2012</p> <p>As America’s relationship with Pakistan has unraveled over the past 18 months, an important debate has been going on within the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad over the proper scope of CIA covert actions and their effect on diplomatic interests.</p> <div class="article_body entry-content"> <article><p>The principals in this policy debate have been <a data-xslt="_http" href="http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/150163.htm">Cameron Munter</a>, the U.S. ambassador since October 2010, and several CIA station chiefs who served with him. The technical issue was whether the ambassador, as chief of mission, had the authority to veto CIA operations he thought would harm long-term relations. Munter appears to have lost this fight [....]</p> </article></div> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:13:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 157670 at http://dagblog.com Drone strikes: activists seek http://dagblog.com/comment/157601#comment-157601 <a id="comment-157601"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/drones-13916">Drones!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/20/drone-strikes-targeted-killings-case">Drone strikes: activists seek to lift lid on open secret of targeted killings</a><br /> Court deadline arrives in freedom of information campaign to make Obama administration provide details of programme<br /><br /> By  Karen McVeigh, <em>guardian.co.uk</em>, 19 June 2012<br /><br /> [...] The federal lawsuit is part of a three-year battle by lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union for details of the drone programme, one of the US government's most important security operations in the war against al-Qaida.</p> <p>Under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in 2010, ACLU seeks the legal memo underlying the killing programme, the basis for drone strikes that have killed American citizens and the process by which individuals are placed on a kill list.</p> <p><strong>The administration has until Wednesday to produce papers in the suit, filed in New York, to either hand over the requested documents or to explain why they are being held</strong>. ACLU hopes it will be the first formal acknowledgment of the programme. If so the CIA would then have to respond to ACLU's FOIA request [...]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:55:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 157601 at http://dagblog.com Love the tweet. Never wanted http://dagblog.com/comment/156873#comment-156873 <a id="comment-156873"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156814#comment-156814">Soon drones will not only be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Love the tweet.</p> <p>Never wanted a jet pack myself -- too accident prone.  Always wanted a replicator and a holodeck to live in, but that's just a big replicator.  I did worry though that I might accidentally turn the thing off while I was in it. <img alt="smiley" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.gif" title="smiley" width="20" /></p> <p>Still digesting the article from Baffler.  Thanks.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:05:47 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 156873 at http://dagblog.com You're right. I misread you. http://dagblog.com/comment/156821#comment-156821 <a id="comment-156821"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156800#comment-156800">Wow, great misread: 1) I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're right. I misread you. So you don't disparage Obama  because you're a pacifist but for some other personal reason. Your historical examples speak for themselves. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:46:58 +0000 Flavius comment 156821 at http://dagblog.com I just wanted the space-age http://dagblog.com/comment/156817#comment-156817 <a id="comment-156817"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156814#comment-156814">Soon drones will not only be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just wanted the space-age pitcher of martinis waiting when I got home. Okay, the glass bubble hovercraft was cool too.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:23:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 156817 at http://dagblog.com By serendipity I just ran http://dagblog.com/comment/156815#comment-156815 <a id="comment-156815"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156814#comment-156814">Soon drones will not only be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>By serendipity I just ran across this, which is related to my comment, but I have a feeling after skimming the first pages that it may interest you much more than my comment:</p> <p><a href="http://www.thebaffler.com/past/of_flying_cars/">Of Flying Cars and the Declining Rate of Profit</a><br /> by David Graeber for <em>The Baffler</em></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:21:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 156815 at http://dagblog.com Soon drones will not only be http://dagblog.com/comment/156814#comment-156814 <a id="comment-156814"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156790#comment-156790">I really do not get the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/chashomans/statuses/210736755933061121">Soon drones will not only be able to kill you w/ impunity but also harass you about getting into shape</a> <img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> <p>A lot of the sci-fi crap from our youth is becoming reality, but just where the fuck are the jet packs we were promised?!!!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:01:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 156814 at http://dagblog.com Declaring war on terror was a http://dagblog.com/comment/156808#comment-156808 <a id="comment-156808"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156801#comment-156801">The problem is, they allow us</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Declaring war on terror <strong><em>was</em></strong> a foolish thing to do.   As for cute word play, remember all the adjectives beside terrorist used to make Al Qaeda et al sound like some new kind of enemy?  Transnational, stateless terrorists  should have been treated like outlaws from the start of it all, 9/11, and policing is exactly what should have happened.   Declaring a criminal act an act of war was just an excuse for the PTB to do exactly what they wanted.  It will be a long time and there will be a lot of grief before we get through it.  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:58:03 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 156808 at http://dagblog.com No, that's not what I would http://dagblog.com/comment/156806#comment-156806 <a id="comment-156806"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156762#comment-156762">so you would like all those</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, that's not what I would "like".</p> <p>Go misinterpret someone else's posts a while.</p> <p>I'm finished.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:13:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 156806 at http://dagblog.com