dagblog - Comments for "Ray Bradbury Is Dead, Alas" http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/ray-bradbury-dead-alas-13919 Comments for "Ray Bradbury Is Dead, Alas" en I'm not much of a Bradbury http://dagblog.com/comment/156614#comment-156614 <a id="comment-156614"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156582#comment-156582">The Painted Bird is just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm not much of a Bradbury fan, but he seems alright, seems to have a sense of humor and some interesting takes. Would read Jerzy Kosinski over him any day, but that's neither here nor there.</p> <p>Here's the Paris Review interview. <a href="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6012/the-art-of-fiction-no-203-ray-bradbury">http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6012/the-art-of-fiction-no-203-ray-bradbury</a></p> <p>I think the thing about Vonnegut was Vonnegut didn't like  him - sounded a bit like an East Coast/West Coast thing, and Bradbury had more of the uncluttered beach &amp; sky California feel. (perhaps a bit like Steinbeck in that way)</p> <p>Maybe Bradbury was a snob, but in that interview, he seems to be enthusiastic, likes a lot of people, have some interesting insights into what he doesn't like or just what he's never gotten into. I like his comment about math. It is funny that even when teaching kids foreign languages we have an obsession about teaching them numbers first.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:56:07 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 156614 at http://dagblog.com That Gaurdian article is a http://dagblog.com/comment/156588#comment-156588 <a id="comment-156588"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156584#comment-156584">Neil Gaiman Last week, at</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That Gaurdian article is a fine tribute.</p> <blockquote> <p>A Ray Bradbury story meant something on its own -</p> </blockquote> <p>I agree completely and am not locked into my impression of the person based on one thing I listened to. I am glad to hear that those close to him were inspired by both his work and his character. Jerzy Kosinski was strongly criticized by some and I am not in a position to rate the validity of those criticisms either, but his art stands on its own. </p> <p> As to writing, I cannot even get my metaphors straight, I referred to myself as 'kettle' when I was playing the roll of 'pot'.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:47:11 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 156588 at http://dagblog.com Neil Gaiman Last week, at http://dagblog.com/comment/156584#comment-156584 <a id="comment-156584"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156578#comment-156578">Dandelion Wine is one of my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jun/06/ray-bradbury-neil-gaiman-appreciation">Neil Gaiman</a></p> <blockquote> <p>Last week, at dinner, a friend told me that when he was a boy of 11 or 12 he met Ray Bradbury. When Bradbury found out that he wanted to be a writer, he invited him to his office and spent half a day telling him the important stuff: if you want to be a writer, you have to write. Every day. Whether you feel like it or not. That you can't write one book and stop. That it's work, but the best kind of work. My friend grew up to be a writer, the kind who writes and supports himself through writing.</p> <p>Ray Bradbury was the kind of person who would give half a day to a kid who wanted to be a writer when he grew up.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:09:52 +0000 Donal comment 156584 at http://dagblog.com The Painted Bird is just http://dagblog.com/comment/156582#comment-156582 <a id="comment-156582"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156578#comment-156578">Dandelion Wine is one of my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Painted Bird is just devastating.</p> <p>It seemed to me, from a recent Paris Review interview, that Bradbury's take on other writers is that he tended not to read them (especially younger science fiction writers) and that he took an uncharitable view of Vonnegut.  Heck, some people are just wrong sometimes!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:30:15 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 156582 at http://dagblog.com Dandelion Wine is one of my http://dagblog.com/comment/156578#comment-156578 <a id="comment-156578"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156557#comment-156557">It would be nice if all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Dandelion Wine</em> is one of my all time favorites but  the author, not so much. My opinion comes from a single live interview I heard some years ago. Too long to remember specifics but he seemed, to me, to be a pompous ass. He held much of our culture in deep disdain, call me a kettle, and had scathing opinion of just about any other writer's work. Some he was particularly disdainful of and then admitted he had never read.<br />  <em>Dandelion Wine</em>, though, is a story that will always stay with me as an idyllic remembrance of childhood. I may read it again. Another story which is the polar opposite of a childhood that was anything and everything other that idyllic but which will also always stay with me is Jerzy Kosinski's <em>Painted Bird</em>. I may read it again too. Or, I may just watch the NBA finals and read some insightful [incite-full?] critiques of our two wonderful Presidential candidates.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:20:32 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 156578 at http://dagblog.com Probably worth noting that http://dagblog.com/comment/156563#comment-156563 <a id="comment-156563"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156557#comment-156557">It would be nice if all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Probably worth noting that Robert Heinlein, a pretty staunch libertarian, was one of Bradbury's mentors and that when Bradbury was coming up, writing for the sci-fi pulps, that the whole genre attracted a slew of very individualist-oriented folks.  Of course, it also attracted Isaac Asimov, as classical a lefty as they come.  But, you know, I can see the appeal of libertarianism to the mind of somebody who might imagine building a rocket ship or time machine in one's basement.  Science fiction is, so often, a celebration of individual ingenuity.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:56:09 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 156563 at http://dagblog.com I See You Never http://dagblog.com/comment/156560#comment-156560 <a id="comment-156560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/ray-bradbury-dead-alas-13919">Ray Bradbury Is Dead, Alas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://archives.newyorker.com/?i=1947-11-08#folio=108">I See You Never</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:27:49 +0000 Donal comment 156560 at http://dagblog.com It would be nice if all http://dagblog.com/comment/156557#comment-156557 <a id="comment-156557"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156551#comment-156551">Ray Bradbury, Tea Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It would be nice if all talented people agreed with my political views.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:16:15 +0000 Donal comment 156557 at http://dagblog.com "I'm a ​man​ conservative http://dagblog.com/comment/156553#comment-156553 <a id="comment-156553"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156551#comment-156551">Ray Bradbury, Tea Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>"I'm a <strike>​man</strike>​ conservative ..."  </p> <p>"Well, nobody's perfect."</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yZymBti7700" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:39:38 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 156553 at http://dagblog.com Ray Bradbury, Tea Party http://dagblog.com/comment/156551#comment-156551 <a id="comment-156551"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/ray-bradbury-dead-alas-13919">Ray Bradbury Is Dead, Alas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <div class="text parbase section"> <div class="text"> <p><a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/06/06/was_ray_bradbury_s_writing_conservative_or_liberal_.html">Ray Bradbury, Tea Party Icon</a><br /> By Jeremy Stahl, Slate, June 6, 2012</p> <p>[....] It’s probably worth noting that Bradbury himself was a staunch conservative in his final years. In fact, he would have made for a great Tea Party icon.</p> </div> </div> <div class="text parbase section"> <div class="text"> <p>“President Reagan was our greatest president. He lowered the taxes and he gave the money back to the people,” Bradbury <a href="http://www.allamericanblogger.com/11479/something-awesome-this-way-comes-ray-bradbury-at-comic-con-reagan-was-our-greatest-president/" target="_blank">told a Comic-Con panel in 2010</a>. “The next election, [the] November [2010 midterms], and two years from now, we’ll take the government back and give it to the people.”</p> </div> </div> <div class="text parbase section"> <div class="text"> <p>At one point or another, Bradbury called former NRA president Charlton Heston an “intellectual,” and Bill Clinton a “shithead,” and <a href="http://www.wnd.com/2004/06/24908/" target="_blank">Michael Moore a “screwed a–hole.”</a> Shortly before 9/11, he said <a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/29/bradbury_2/" target="_blank">President Bush was “wonderful”</a> and that the country “needed him.”</p> </div> </div> <div class="text parbase section"> <div class="text"> <p>Prior to the 2010 midterms he even used the inflammatory language of the Tea Party in <a href="http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2010/08/16/ray-bradbury-is-sick-of-big-government-our-country-is-in-need-of-a-revolution/" target="_blank">calling for a new American revolution.</a> “I hope that sometime this fall, we can destroy part of our government, and next year destroy even more of it,” <a href="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,2012734,00.html" target="_blank">Bradbury said</a> in one of his final interviews with <em>Time</em> magazine [....]</p> </div> </div> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:30:36 +0000 artappraiser comment 156551 at http://dagblog.com