dagblog - Comments for "Cops gone wild" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/cops-gone-wild-13924 Comments for "Cops gone wild" en wild with their guns too. http://dagblog.com/comment/162148#comment-162148 <a id="comment-162148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/cops-gone-wild-13924">Cops gone wild</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www10.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/nyregion/bystanders-shooting-wounds-caused-by-the-police.html?_r=5&amp;hp">wild with their guns too.</a> Needed: "gun control"</div></div></div> Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:57:41 +0000 jollyroger comment 162148 at http://dagblog.com "The Constitution has been http://dagblog.com/comment/157365#comment-157365 <a id="comment-157365"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/cops-gone-wild-13924">Cops gone wild</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www10.nytimes.com/2012/06/18/opinion/the-nypds-obsession-with-numbers.html?_r=5">"The Constitution has been thrown out the window when it comes to stops"</a> Today a former high ranking cop sheds light on the contradictions (ostensible) implicit in the memo from Kelly and the continued unlawful police conduct. A new mayor and an Inspector General are coming. It can't happen soon enough.</div></div></div> Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:58:40 +0000 jollyroger comment 157365 at http://dagblog.com I think that was Ephesians, http://dagblog.com/comment/156716#comment-156716 <a id="comment-156716"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156679#comment-156679">&quot;Zip it&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I think that was Ephesians, but you would know better than I...</div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:19:48 +0000 jollyroger comment 156716 at http://dagblog.com "Zip it" http://dagblog.com/comment/156679#comment-156679 <a id="comment-156679"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156652#comment-156652">I normally limit my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Zip it" </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:28:29 +0000 Resistance comment 156679 at http://dagblog.com jollyrodger: I have never http://dagblog.com/comment/156658#comment-156658 <a id="comment-156658"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156657#comment-156657">On second read, I see that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>jollyrodger:</p> <p>I have never read the Bible.  I do pray and believe in miracles.  I DO NOT discuss religion or politics.  Thank you for the "no harm", as your evaluation of my post to DD was, truly, not a shadow of any secret doctrine.  I did not read what you posted as I'm not interested in opinionated BS.  Whoops!  I guess my last statement is opinionated!  Anyway, I hold DD in the greatest esteem and highly value his recognition of me.  And that is that.  My posts are short and sweet...I imply nothing!  Thanks for being understanding,  jolly.</p> <p>Chuck</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 03:20:08 +0000 chucktrotter comment 156658 at http://dagblog.com On second read, I see that http://dagblog.com/comment/156657#comment-156657 <a id="comment-156657"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156655#comment-156655">jollyroger: Perhaps my reply</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">On second read, I see that you were clearly referencing letters from DD. As usual, I was too high...</div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:55:51 +0000 jollyroger comment 156657 at http://dagblog.com No harm, no foul. I am http://dagblog.com/comment/156656#comment-156656 <a id="comment-156656"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156655#comment-156655">jollyroger: Perhaps my reply</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">No harm, no foul. I am delighted by all traffic, especially when it helps two friends stay in touch. I thought you were referencing St. Paul's Epistles, and was snarking about this <a href="http://ebible.org/web/Romans.htm">http://ebible.org/web/Romans.htm</a> Too obscure. </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:36:21 +0000 jollyroger comment 156656 at http://dagblog.com jollyroger: Perhaps my reply http://dagblog.com/comment/156655#comment-156655 <a id="comment-156655"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156652#comment-156652">I normally limit my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>jollyroger:</p> <p>Perhaps my reply to DD was not appropriate, but I'm not on Facebook nor Twitter, so responded in the only way I could.  Your response was  welcome if I was blessed with the education (intellect) to understand what you were inferring with your post.  I have never heard of Saul of Tarsus nor associated circumcision with "How are you doing, Chuck?"  Please translate to one with an average intellect what you are inferring.  No hostility implied!  Thnx...</p> <p> </p> <p>Chuck</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:09:44 +0000 chucktrotter comment 156655 at http://dagblog.com I normally limit my http://dagblog.com/comment/156652#comment-156652 <a id="comment-156652"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156649#comment-156649">Thanks for asking DD. Still</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I normally limit my intrusions into overheard conversations to when I am next to a few cute girls at a bar. You guys don't qualify, but I wonder if I by epistles you are referring to the work of Saul of Tarsus, the greatest marketing genius of all time, author of the jingle "No need to snip it, you just have to dip it"...(substituting baptism for circumcision in conversion to Christianity)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:16:12 +0000 jollyroger comment 156652 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for asking DD. Still http://dagblog.com/comment/156649#comment-156649 <a id="comment-156649"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/156640#comment-156640">What are the odds of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for asking DD.  Still south of you absorbing all of your contaminated water.  Waiting for the Miss to drop another foot so that I may seek the wily walleye.  (Catch and release!)  Watch for your posts every day...Had I half of your intellect!  Going through the aging process with a few visits to La Crosse.  Still smoking and drinking and reading.  Met a Dr. at Mayo who had his clinic blown out by Katrina.  A nice guy, but he's a true coon ass.  Think I'll adopt him and teach him a few river rat tricks.  Hope you're doing well and don't quit writing...I do get drowsy reading epistles which you tend to avoid.</p> <p>Chuck</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:23:56 +0000 chucktrotter comment 156649 at http://dagblog.com