dagblog - Comments for "Ask your doctor if Wolf Blitzer is right for you" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/ask-your-doctor-if-wolf-blitzer-right-you-13986 Comments for "Ask your doctor if Wolf Blitzer is right for you" en AA, one can be a huge fan of http://dagblog.com/comment/157159#comment-157159 <a id="comment-157159"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157087#comment-157087">Yup, news roundups are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>AA, one can be a huge fan of Cronkite, Huntley, Brinkley, etc., and still not be able to stomach Wolf Blitzer.  It's not that he's boring, or that there isn't a place for someone reporting the news in a subjective, straightforward way, it's that the man is so damned <em>annoying</em>. </p> <p>If he's not going at it breathlessly (as in, "How horrible was it?", an exact quote many times over), he's distracted and struggling for just the right word (which almost never comes).  Considering how long he's been at it he still comes across as an embarrassing amateur.  </p> <p>I would love to see a serious, unbiased news show, but I would hope when it comes nobody invites Wolf Blitzer to anchor it.  I won't be able to watch it.  Seriously.</p> <p>By the way, I don't think we're trashing CNN, unless Wolf owns it.  Soledad O'Brien's new morning show is very good.  Anderson Cooper can be amazing at times.  There is still some excellent reporting coming out of CNN.  I just don't see where Blitzer is doing any of it, and I don't know many people who think he has any talent as a newscaster. </p> <p>That's the mystery.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:54:35 +0000 Ramona comment 157159 at http://dagblog.com I've always suspected Blitzer http://dagblog.com/comment/157152#comment-157152 <a id="comment-157152"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/ask-your-doctor-if-wolf-blitzer-right-you-13986">Ask your doctor if Wolf Blitzer is right for you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've always suspected Blitzer is either related to a biggie over at CNN or has something on someone big.  He is the least talented news show headliner I've ever seen anywhere, and that might possibly include anyone at Fox.  (I don't know that for sure since I don't watch anyone at Fox, but I hear rumors.)</p> <p>Wolf's voice, his mannerisms, his inanities, his softball interviews. . .annoying beyond belief.  I just can't watch him anymore.  And since this is still America, at least for the time being, I don't have to.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:32:15 +0000 Ramona comment 157152 at http://dagblog.com Woodruff may have been a http://dagblog.com/comment/157120#comment-157120 <a id="comment-157120"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157119#comment-157119">And to think they fired Judy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Woodruff may have been a jewel at CNN, but she's the class clown at newhour. She reliably toes the pug line in interviews. Follow up? Softballs only.</div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:59:59 +0000 jollyroger comment 157120 at http://dagblog.com And to think they fired Judy http://dagblog.com/comment/157119#comment-157119 <a id="comment-157119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157090#comment-157090">I used to get these awful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And to think they fired Judy from CNN.  The last day I watched CNN was the last day Judy Woodruff was on.  They made the mistake of running off Ted Turner.  </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:51:27 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 157119 at http://dagblog.com I used to get these awful http://dagblog.com/comment/157090#comment-157090 <a id="comment-157090"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/ask-your-doctor-if-wolf-blitzer-right-you-13986">Ask your doctor if Wolf Blitzer is right for you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I used to get these awful head aches when I was on Wolf Blitzer but since my doctor switched me to Judy Woodruff I no longer have many side effects at all. </p> <p>Just a mild dizziness with the initial application followed by some loss of mental acuity and confusion.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:06:57 +0000 cmaukonen comment 157090 at http://dagblog.com Yup, news roundups are http://dagblog.com/comment/157087#comment-157087 <a id="comment-157087"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/ask-your-doctor-if-wolf-blitzer-right-you-13986">Ask your doctor if Wolf Blitzer is right for you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yup, news roundups are considered boring by the majority.</p> <p>Now I will accept that Wolf is no Cronkite, but he at least continues the style of anchor presenting the news, not punditry, and I recall that Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley were considered boring, too, for doing the same. Was like eating spinach for many folks, homework you had to do to be a responsible citizen, serious white guys droning news reports at a desk  and sometimes asking another white guy from Washington DC a question. (And also depressing, ie, "geez that news is depressing, hon, why do you always have to watch the news, can you please switch to the game show on the independent network?")</p> <p>Yes, it's considered more exciting and garners much better ratings to have pundits yelling at each other or at minimum earnestly preaching their political p.o.v.  and putting their own spin on the days' stories like a lot of bloggers do.</p> <p>And doing "gotchas" with interviewees, that's another biggie; then everyone can blog on gotcha and Facebook the gotcha..</p> <p>Why do people find it useful or good to trash CNN? At least they <em>try</em> to push some news with the political shlock and political manipulation. And it costs them to do that, to keep pushing at least some news when cable "news" watchers don't really want news but politics, it really does. For example, I'd be willing to bet Zakaria's show is a big money loser for them.  And that if they got rid of Wolf and got someone more "exciting," more provocative, more argumentative, they could make more money. So all the shows are not as serious as in the old CNN days, at least they still try, while the others gave up long ago..</p> <p>Side note: kudos due to Bloomberg TV, which I get, for not going the way of CNBC yet (by which i mean the same path and as Fox News and MSNBC.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:17:53 +0000 artappraiser comment 157087 at http://dagblog.com Yes A Tree Grows At CNN: http://dagblog.com/comment/157080#comment-157080 <a id="comment-157080"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157078#comment-157078">I had forgotten about him. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes  </p> <p><strong>A Tree Grows At CNN: Fareed Zakaria And The Quest For Journalistic Integrity</strong></p> <p>“Far from just asking the typical pointless questions, the moderator, Fareed Zakaria, was attempting to get a dialogue of ideas flowing between the guests. ……. Whenever the train seemed on the verge of jumping the tracks he would step in and steer it back on course like a good moderator is supposed to do – hello, David Gregory</p> <p>That’s because Fareed Zakaria is an actual journalist. He is both editor-at-large and a columnist for <em>Time</em> magazine, as well as <em>The Washington Post</em>. As recently as 2010, he was a columnist for <em>Newsweek</em> and editor of its international division.”</p> <p>CNN has captured lightning in a bottle here, albeit quite by accident. …. Fareed Zakaria is the perfect tonic for an ailing profession.</p> <p><a href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/21/a-tree-grows-at-cnn-fareed-zakaria-and-the-quest-for-journalistic-integrity/">http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/21/a-tree-grows-at-cnn-fareed-zakaria-and-the-quest-for-journalistic-integrity/</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:17:01 +0000 Resistance comment 157080 at http://dagblog.com I had forgotten about him. I http://dagblog.com/comment/157078#comment-157078 <a id="comment-157078"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157074#comment-157074">Fareed Zakaria examines the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I had forgotten about him. I haven't watched CNN for a long time now.Does he still ask the question of the day?</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:57:47 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 157078 at http://dagblog.com hahahahaahahahaah Jack is http://dagblog.com/comment/157075#comment-157075 <a id="comment-157075"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157068#comment-157068">Was he from his mother&#039;s womb</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahahahaahahahaah</p> <p>Jack is worth the time, assuming you can kind of channel surf as a genius to catch him.</p> <p>His one political position is to ALWAYS VOTE YOUR CURRENT REPRESENTATIVE OUT OF OFFICE.</p> <p>I gotta believe it would be fun to drink about eight beers with him in some dark bar somewhere. hahahahahah</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:11:33 +0000 Richard Day comment 157075 at http://dagblog.com Fareed Zakaria examines the http://dagblog.com/comment/157074#comment-157074 <a id="comment-157074"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/157071#comment-157071">I really do like the format</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fareed Zakaria examines the problems in depth.  </p> <p><a href="http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/">http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:57:20 +0000 Resistance comment 157074 at http://dagblog.com