dagblog - Comments for "Romney to Prez: Don't bullshit a bullshitter"

Ronulan fruitcake, guilty as

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:58:42 +0000

In reply to Nixon wasn't impeached, he

Ronulan fruitcake, guilty as charged. "w" voter?

Not so fine with excluding

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:06:32 +0000

In reply to I was better than fine with

Not so fine with excluding the Libyan adventure from the definition of "armed conflict " on account of we weren't losing any personnel.

I was better than fine with

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:02:36 +0000

In reply to Nixon wasn't impeached, he

I was better than fine with security council justification

No offense - my girls hit

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:41:43 +0000

In reply to I am not psychoanalyzing you.

No offense - my girls hit hard, much harder than that.

Nixon wasn't impeached, he

NCD — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:11:11 +0000

In reply to Would You really want to

Nixon wasn't impeached, he was tossed to the Democratic dogs by the right wing because the right couldn't stand Nixon, they hated his long list of liberal policies, and the NATO operation in Libya was approved by the UN Security Council, it was not an impeachable offense. The Iraq invasion by Bush wasn't approved by the UN and was impeachable.

Jolly, are you just another Ronulan Dag fruitcake, so delusional that you voted at least once for George W. Bush, because you thought he stood for freedom? Tell me it's not true!

An AA accolade is reward

moat — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:35:40 +0000

In reply to All this matter of assigning

An AA accolade is reward enough for me. Hopefully that check Genghis said he mailed last week will arrive today and I can go out and celebrate properly.

Would You really want to

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:53:09 +0000

In reply to I don't want to let the,"Bin

Would You really want to argue that Libya was anything but an impeachable offense as great as anything Nixon ever did?

Above read "domestic sins" (stupid auto complete ...)

I don't want to let the,"Bin

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:47:45 +0000

In reply to Short summary of this blog

I don't want to let the,"Bin Laden" doctrine disappear with no serious discussion. Virtually all the sturm & drang to which you have applied your reductionist formula relates to domestic wins of ommision or commission.. We ought not pass over with no comment that this shrinking violet who could not muster the recess appointments and executive orders that repugnant obstruction demanded had no problem flagrantly violating the war powers act, putting us on notice that murders will be cheerfully done in our name and tough shit if we get blown back on.

Because they want the greater

jollyroger — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:29:27 +0000

In reply to Short summary of this blog

Because they want the greater evil, and are really cool, indeed enthusiastic, about it As my rather florid thought experiment lays out, I don't want my fingerprints on murder.

Short summary of this blog

NCD — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:25:31 +0000

In reply to Romney to Prez: Don't bullshit a bullshitter

Short summary of this blog and comments:

Obama:....dithered and delayed failed could have laid down and died Obummer. Not exactly ....inspiring driven mad by teeth grinding frustration terribly flawed Why run for President if you don't want to be in charge roughed up by his strategic superiors If your man can't do it, I suggest he resign..

A question:

If Obama is all the above, why are Sheldon Adelson, Koch and other billionaires, spending tens and hundreds of millions to kick Obama out of office, and put Rmoney in? Think about it....money talks...what is it saying?