dagblog - Comments for "Romney: &quot;Obama wasted his presidency on Obamacare&quot;" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/romney-obama-wasted-his-presidency-obamacare-14100 Comments for "Romney: "Obama wasted his presidency on Obamacare"" en If Erin Burnett dressed like http://dagblog.com/comment/158249#comment-158249 <a id="comment-158249"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158245#comment-158245">http://www.youtube.com/watch?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If Erin Burnett dressed like that? </p> <p>Maybe more folks, would tune in to the news?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:28:57 +0000 Resistance comment 158249 at http://dagblog.com http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://dagblog.com/comment/158245#comment-158245 <a id="comment-158245"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158241#comment-158241">Well, whenever I&#039;m having a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGqqS6MMknM&amp;feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGqqS6MMknM&amp;feature=related</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:58:14 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 158245 at http://dagblog.com Well, whenever I'm having a http://dagblog.com/comment/158241#comment-158241 <a id="comment-158241"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/romney-obama-wasted-his-presidency-obamacare-14100">Romney: &quot;Obama wasted his presidency on Obamacare&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, whenever I'm having a pretty good day, I can always come to dagblog and read the comments to cure it. No one turns good news into bad news like a Dagmenter.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:17:44 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 158241 at http://dagblog.com Only if you consider this a http://dagblog.com/comment/158234#comment-158234 <a id="comment-158234"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158225#comment-158225">Sounds like you are buying</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Only if you consider this a conspiracy:</p> <p>paying attention to what's hot on the net in your demographic = higher ratings</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:15:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 158234 at http://dagblog.com Michele Bachmann on the http://dagblog.com/comment/158231#comment-158231 <a id="comment-158231"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158223#comment-158223">E.J. Dionne, Jr., who chooses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Michele Bachmann on the decision: "This is clearly unconstitutional."</p> <p>“This is clearly unconstitutional...”</p> <p><a href="http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/bachmann-activist-supreme-courts-decision-far-reaching-obamacare-unconstitutional/politics/2012/06/28/42367">http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/bachmann-activist-supreme-courts-decision-far-reaching-obamacare-unconstitutional/politics/2012/06/28/42367</a></p> <p>So we have a Supreme Court justice in Scalia who appears to want to be an elected politician, and an elected official in Bachmann who appears to believe she is qualified to be a Supreme Court justice, or at least offer credible views on what the Constitution says.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:07:00 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 158231 at http://dagblog.com Oh, DoubleA, say it aint so! http://dagblog.com/comment/158228#comment-158228 <a id="comment-158228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158221#comment-158221">Rachel Maddow stole my stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Oh, DoubleA, say it aint so! Matthews is a dimwitted blowhard, whereas the kindly Dr Maddow is a jewel!</div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:49:29 +0000 jollyroger comment 158228 at http://dagblog.com Sounds like you are buying http://dagblog.com/comment/158225#comment-158225 <a id="comment-158225"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158221#comment-158221">Rachel Maddow stole my stuff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sounds like you are buying into a conspiracy theory. Hmm.</p> <p>  That means there must be some other explanation but I have seen it too in different places and thought the same thing. Just to be contrary [with myself too] I suggest that on most topics there are only a few sensible ways to think about them. If Maddow and her team were to come up with a story line on her own it would almost surely be one that one of the multitude of bloggers had also come up with.</p> <p>PS,  HardBall is the show that I don't admit watching.<img alt="smiley" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.gif" title="smiley" width="20" />  </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:39:00 +0000 LULU comment 158225 at http://dagblog.com E.J. Dionne, Jr., who chooses http://dagblog.com/comment/158223#comment-158223 <a id="comment-158223"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158171#comment-158171">My family was discussing what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>E.J. Dionne, Jr., who chooses his rare individual targets carefully, June 27 piece "Justice Scalia Must Resign": <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-jr-justice-scalia-should-resign/2012/06/27/gJQApkO06V_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-jr-justice-scalia-should-resign/2012/06/27/gJQApkO06V_story.html</a></p> <p>This is about as hard as he will ever come down on an individual.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:30:56 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 158223 at http://dagblog.com Rachel Maddow stole my stuff http://dagblog.com/comment/158221#comment-158221 <a id="comment-158221"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158210#comment-158210">Thanks Artsy. What a great</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><span style="font-size: 13px">Rachel Maddow stole my stuff in an interview with Andrea Mitchell.</span></em></p> <p>I swear her staff really does that, I've seen too many instances of her saying stuff I just read on a blog discussion. (My laptop set-up faces a TV and I often have the tube on in the background; not a big Rachel fan but it's often ends up on in the background after I watch Hardball.)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:14:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 158221 at http://dagblog.com Thanks Artsy. What a great http://dagblog.com/comment/158210#comment-158210 <a id="comment-158210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/158209#comment-158209">Maybe ACA didn&#039;t go his way</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: 13px">Thanks Artsy. What a great concept---the Roberts Court is born. </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 13px">Funny---just this moment, Rachel Maddow stole my stuff in an interview with Andrea Mitchell. It was almost word for word. </span></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:16:48 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 158210 at http://dagblog.com