dagblog - Comments for "Stopping a Mass Shooter" http://dagblog.com/personal/stopping-mass-shooter-14390 Comments for "Stopping a Mass Shooter" en While I do agree with the TOS http://dagblog.com/comment/160378#comment-160378 <a id="comment-160378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160363#comment-160363">That&#039;s it. You&#039;ve reached the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>While I do agree with the TOS and absolutely will not participate in unmoderated blogs anymore, I have to admit I did call Resistance a kook. "Then you and your band of <strike>kooks</strike> freedom fighters would be all set to take on the US military." So I have to own my part in it.</p> <p>I probably should have let it go but I just found the rants about the peasants taking on the 700 billion dollar a year US military with machine guns and "a few easily concealed shoulder fired missiles" too funny. I couldn't resist playing along. I wasn't offended by resistance because the whole thing just seemed too silly to take seriously.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:46:54 +0000 ocean-kat comment 160378 at http://dagblog.com That's it. You've reached the http://dagblog.com/comment/160363#comment-160363 <a id="comment-160363"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160361#comment-160361">Manners? Where were you, when</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's it. You've reached the point where you're not even writing coherent sentences.</p> <p>This</p> <blockquote> <p>Where were you, when it was apparent of the exaggerations meant to embarrass or humiliate?</p> </blockquote> <p>does not actually mean anything.</p> <p>Destor was, gently, reminding you of the ToS. I will remind you less gently. Your response to Ocean-kat clearly violates them.</p> <p>It is bad enough that you're clogging up the thread with repeated filibusters, making the same points over and over again. People who were not convinced by them once will not be convinced by reading them for the sixth time. But the five shrieking repetitions do drive other people, who might add something worthwhile, out of the conversation.</p> <p>Nobody insulted, embarrassed or humiliated you, or even gave it a try. Making up imaginary attacks on you is not an excuse for real and obvious attacks on others.</p> <p>You're done with this thread. I will delete any further comments from you (except an apoology to Ocean-Kat), and if there is more nonsense I will consult with the other mods about your ToS violations.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:27:21 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 160363 at http://dagblog.com Manners? Where were you, when http://dagblog.com/comment/160361#comment-160361 <a id="comment-160361"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160352#comment-160352">Manners.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Manners? Where were you, when it was apparent of the exaggerations meant to embarrass or humiliate? </p> <p>Cat <strike>Kat </strike>got your tongue?</p> <p>Besides; it was posed as a question and as they say "if the shoe fits, wear it " </p> <p>Everyone should pay something.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:20:11 +0000 Resistance comment 160361 at http://dagblog.com Just like Romney I've reduced http://dagblog.com/comment/160357#comment-160357 <a id="comment-160357"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160351#comment-160351">I choose a life of poverty 30</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just like Romney I've reduced my tax burden in an entirely legal fashion. Though without the 100 million IRA or the Cayman Island tax shelter. I simply don't earn enough to pay income tax. I don't need that much money to be happy. In fact I'm much happier with large amounts of free time.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:00:49 +0000 ocean-kat comment 160357 at http://dagblog.com Manners. http://dagblog.com/comment/160352#comment-160352 <a id="comment-160352"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160351#comment-160351">I choose a life of poverty 30</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Manners.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:42:44 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 160352 at http://dagblog.com I choose a life of poverty 30 http://dagblog.com/comment/160351#comment-160351 <a id="comment-160351"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160331#comment-160331">&quot;Of course you dont or can&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>I choose a life of poverty 30 years ago and haven't paid any federal income tax at all</p> </blockquote> <p>A FREELOADER, <span id="hotword" name="hotword" style="color: #333333; cursor: default">leech,</span> <span id="hotword" name="hotword" style="color: #333333; cursor: default">moocher,</span> parasite? </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:38:31 +0000 Resistance comment 160351 at http://dagblog.com "Of course you dont or can't http://dagblog.com/comment/160331#comment-160331 <a id="comment-160331"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160330#comment-160330">Buy an F-16 today, It&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"Of course you dont or can't see; you <u><strong>already bought</strong></u> the F-16, that will be <u><strong>used against you."</strong></u></p> <p>Not me dude, I choose a life of poverty 30 years ago and haven't paid any federal income tax at all. You must be the bastard that paid 17 million in income tax to buy that F-16 that will be used against me. And the income tax is unconstitutional too!</p> <p><a href="http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/IncomeTax.htm">http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/IncomeTax.htm</a></p> <p>Here's my first suggestion to help you lead the peasants in their revolt against the tyrannical government. Stop paying the unconstitutional federal income tax. No sense giving them more money while you're preparing to overthrow the oppressors.</p> <p>"We sold or gave them, shoulder fired missiles, to be used against Russian military aircraft."</p> <p>Hey, I bet those Russkies would be happy to get even for that by giving you some shoulder fired missiles. That's my second suggestion, you should contact the Russians and ask for a few dozen. Then you and your band of <strike>kooks</strike> freedom fighters would be all set to take on the US military.</p> <p>Good luck!</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:32:16 +0000 ocean-kat comment 160331 at http://dagblog.com Buy an F-16 today, It's http://dagblog.com/comment/160330#comment-160330 <a id="comment-160330"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160329#comment-160329">ROTFLMAO You&#039;re right, we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p jquery1343880217164="16">Buy an F-16 today,</p> </blockquote> <p jquery1343880217164="16">It's evident your clueless. </p> <p jquery1343880217164="16">Of course you dont or can't see; you <u><strong>already bought</strong></u> the F-16, that will be <u><strong>used against you.</strong></u></p> <p>It appears you are ignorant; of our involvement with the Mujahideen in their war against the Russians? </p> <p>We sold or gave them, shoulder fired missiles, to be used against Russian military aircraft.</p> <p>Now maybe a few easily concealed shoulder fired missiles, would be more bang for the buck? <strike>You think</strike></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:31:57 +0000 Resistance comment 160330 at http://dagblog.com ROTFLMAO You're right, we http://dagblog.com/comment/160329#comment-160329 <a id="comment-160329"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160328#comment-160328">Just as tanks, bazookas,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ROTFLMAO</p> <p>You're right, we peasants can take on the US military. But we need tanks and planes and anti tank and aircraft missiles. I think we should start with F-16s.</p> <p>I'm ready to do my part. I'm buying a F-16 just as soon as I raise the 17 million dollars it costs. Hey Resistance, you could help by sending me the first million.</p> <p>Of course one F-16 won't do much against the 2000 the USAF has so 1999 of you DAG bloggers have to stand up and do your part too.</p> <p>"How long will you sit idly by, as the safety net is destroyed, in order to finance wars you never wanted, PAWN ? " Are you all so cowed and submissive you won't spend a measly 34 billion for 2000 F-16s.</p> <p>Buy an F-16 today.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:57:16 +0000 ocean-kat comment 160329 at http://dagblog.com Just as tanks, bazookas, http://dagblog.com/comment/160328#comment-160328 <a id="comment-160328"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160323#comment-160323">The peasant class isn&#039;t going</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Just as tanks, bazookas, bombs, and anti-aircraft missiles don't belong in the hands of ordinary citizens.</p> </blockquote> <p>Tell that to the ordinary citizens of Aleppo, resisting a leader and his followers who don't give a crap about the peasant class. </p> <p>Ordinary citizens told to STFU and accept your lot in life.</p> <p>You saying, it cant happen here?  Our forefathers thought otherwise.</p> <p>Threat keeps tyranny in check.   </p> <p>When the rebels in Syria remove the air superiority of Assad, the people might gain their freedom? </p> <p>Freedom from corruption, unless the ruling class, continues it's domination over the ordinary peasant class after the revolt, in order to keep the peasant class as servants to the elitists.</p> <p>Egypt proves, the elites never relinquish their influence to corrupt power; to force the citizenry to serve THEM, not WE.   </p> <p>Taking away our ability to counter air superiority, weakens our position.</p> <p><u><strong>A tyrannical government doesn't feel remorse. </strong></u></p> <p>How long will you sit idly by, as the safety net is destroyed, in order to finance wars you never wanted, PAWN ?  </p> <p>When they're grabbing you and your children, to the altar of fire, offering up YOU as a sacrifice, and you unarmed, crying out "how do we stop this madness"</p> <p>"Everyone get your slingshots?"</p> <p>Or maybe your too easily fooled, by reports of Saddams weapons, of mass destruction, "Hell no, our government would never lie to us" "lay down your arms, we can trust them" </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:04:11 +0000 Resistance comment 160328 at http://dagblog.com