dagblog - Comments for "Veep Paul Ryan Open Thread" http://dagblog.com/politics/veep-paul-ryan-open-thread-14452 Comments for "Veep Paul Ryan Open Thread" en I love that Romney's attack http://dagblog.com/comment/161110#comment-161110 <a id="comment-161110"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160915#comment-160915">Right, deep thinking. I think</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I love that Romney's attack ad on welfare reform shows on the screen that the Heritage Foundation is a source for one of its claims.  This may be one of the few helpful pieces of information disclosed in a campaign ad this season, as a few folks watching that ad know what the Heritage Foundation is. </p> <p>    </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:11:33 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 161110 at http://dagblog.com Community re-investment Act http://dagblog.com/comment/161094#comment-161094 <a id="comment-161094"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160951#comment-160951">There was never, ever, a law</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Community re-investment Act title VII (Sec. 802 forward) a little light reading...</p> <p> </p> <p>The beginning of the housing bubble had nothing to do with the federal government bureaucracy and "compassionate" progressive policy. Let's be honest and serious.  Regulations written to leave open-ended power and interpretation to the regulators that wield them will always result in dislocation, and tyranny.  Not to mention a world wide financial collapse that many of you actually blame on George Bush (who I'm not a fan of, mind you). Wow.  (Spoiler alert! The energy crisis is next, stay tuned) </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:41:54 +0000 The Proud Constitutionalist comment 161094 at http://dagblog.com http://www.fdic.gov/regulatio http://dagblog.com/comment/161092#comment-161092 <a id="comment-161092"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160951#comment-160951">There was never, ever, a law</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/6500-2515.html">http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/6500-2515.html</a></p> <p> </p> <p>The beginning of the housing bubble had nothing to do with the federal government bureaucracy and "compassionate" progressive policy. Let's be honest and serious.  Regulations written to leave open-ended power and interpretation to the regulators that wield them will always result in dislocation, and tyranny.  Not to mention a world wide financial collapse that many of you actually blame on George Bush (who I'm not a fan of, mind you). Wow.  (Spoiler alert! The energy crisis is next, stay tuned) </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:38:49 +0000 The Proud Constitutionalist comment 161092 at http://dagblog.com On the other hand, think how http://dagblog.com/comment/161074#comment-161074 <a id="comment-161074"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/161060#comment-161060">tmac, Did u</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On the other hand, think how nice it would be if we could make Ryan lose twice on election night ...</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:49:25 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 161074 at http://dagblog.com tmac, Did u http://dagblog.com/comment/161060#comment-161060 <a id="comment-161060"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160920#comment-160920">Hah, des you are right. I am</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>tmac, Did u know....</p> <blockquote> <h2 class="entry-title"> <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/08/winwin-for-ryan-on-election-day-131790.html"><u><font color="#0066cc">What happens to Paul Ryan's House seat?</font></u></a></h2> <div class="byline"> <p>By <a href="http://www.politico.com/reporters/KatieGlueck.html" rel="nofollow"><u><font color="#0066cc">KATIE GLUECK</font></u></a> |</p> <h5 class="blog-date"> <abbr class="published" title="2012-08-11T12:15">8/11/12 12:15 PM EDT </abbr></h5> </div> <div class="entry-content p-content"> <p>For newly minted GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan, Election Day will be a win-win situation.</p> <p>Ryan, currently the powerful House Budget Chair, is a Wisconsin congressman currently in his seventh term and widely expected to be able to win reelection to his southeast Wisconsin seat.</p> <p>That’s not a bad fall-back if he and Mitt Romney lose the presidential race. Ryan can keep his options open as a result of a Wisconsin <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/what-paul-ryans-vp-pick-means-for-his-house-seat/2012/08/11/115093c6-e3a5-11e1-ae7f-d2a13e249eb2_blog.html" target="_blank"><u><font color="#0066cc">policy</font></u></a> that allows candidates running for office, who are also on the ticket for president or vice president, to appear on ballots twice. He is planning to run for re-election to his House seat, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/ryan-would-be-able-to-stay-on-ballot-for-reelection-d36f2o1-165826096.html" target="_blank"><u><font color="#0066cc">reported</font></u></a>.</p> <p>So if the White House doesn’t work out, Ryan can likely return to his influential role in Congress. And if it does, a special election will be held to fill Ryan's seat.</p> </div> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:57:34 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 161060 at http://dagblog.com If those who describe http://dagblog.com/comment/160977#comment-160977 <a id="comment-160977"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160973#comment-160973">I&#039;ve been on facebook too</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If those who describe themselves as far left don't vote for Obama, except for not voting, I don't see 'they' have another option.  It's the women's, minorities and independent votes that will decide the outcome, not a select, self described group of political extremists.</p> <p>I read somewhere that the Romney-Ryan ticket is the three 'Rs' - Romney, Ryan and Rightwingers.  Then there's one goin' around about the GOP's election sandwich:  two slices of white 'blunder' bread without any meat or flavor.  Of course, someone's going to start marketing Mitt's new bbq apron, 'Kiss the Kochs'.  And the list goes on.......</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:59:31 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 160977 at http://dagblog.com I've been on facebook too http://dagblog.com/comment/160973#comment-160973 <a id="comment-160973"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160966#comment-160966">Stilli, I just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've been on facebook too long, I was looking for the 'LIKE' button. Good to see you, too, Aunt Sam. So what do think? Will the far left turn out for Obama?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:20:58 +0000 stillidealistic comment 160973 at http://dagblog.com Stilli, I just http://dagblog.com/comment/160966#comment-160966 <a id="comment-160966"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160964#comment-160964">I&#039;m having a hard time coming</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Stilli,</p> <p>            I just read Ryan described as Palin without the boobs ad twang. </p> <p>            Many are declaring that neither Romney or Ryan have any military or foreign affairs experience and this is an important deficit to many of the GOP 'warmongers' .</p> <p>             I agree, this 'choice' has great potential to do more harm than good to the repub ticket. </p> <p>             Nice to 'converse' with you again.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:17:37 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 160966 at http://dagblog.com I'm having a hard time coming http://dagblog.com/comment/160964#comment-160964 <a id="comment-160964"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/veep-paul-ryan-open-thread-14452">Veep Paul Ryan Open Thread</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm having a hard time coming up with a scenario whereby this pick helps Romney. The only people who love Ryan are the ones who NEVER would have voted for Obama anyway.</p> <p>I don't think Romney picked Ryan because he really believes he is the right man for the job, I think he picked him out of desperation. Bold, my ass. It was opportunistic, plain and simple. Just like Palin was. The difference is Ryan has a brain, even though that brain thinks ker-azy stuff.</p> <p>The quick ad up from the Obama camp shows they knew this was a possibility. That's a good thing. Just as they were able to define Romney, hopefully they will be able to define Ryan, as well.</p> <p>The right will come out to vote FOR Ryan, but they would have come out anyway to vote AGAINST Obama, given how much they hate him. So their motivation is of little importance, as far as I can tell.</p> <p>Now the question is, will the left come out to vote AGAINST Ryan, when they aren't so keen to vote FOR Obama.</p> <p>If not, we can only hope there are enough people in the middle who are scared to death of what a takeover by the crazies will mean for the country.</p> <p>-Stilli (aka Janet Forrest - I'm coming out of the political closet)</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:44:33 +0000 stillidealistic comment 160964 at http://dagblog.com Hey, a guy who can construct http://dagblog.com/comment/160963#comment-160963 <a id="comment-160963"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/160928#comment-160928">I think David Frum has summed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Hey, a guy who can construct an axis out of a secular dictator with a history as US proxy, a theocratic oligarchy and the world's last Stalinist is talented . As for his (and Bruce Bartlett's) belated journey from the dark side, viva the axis of apostasy </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:19:54 +0000 jollyroger comment 160963 at http://dagblog.com