dagblog - Comments for "Embrace the War on Women for the Win" http://dagblog.com/politics/embrace-war-women-win-14531 Comments for "Embrace the War on Women for the Win" en Res ipsa loquitor: Ann http://dagblog.com/comment/161907#comment-161907 <a id="comment-161907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/embrace-war-women-win-14531">Embrace the War on Women for the Win</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Res ipsa loquitor</em>:</p> <p><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/22/ann-coulter-i-officially-hate-todd-akin/#ixzz24KeDoYfL">Ann Coulter: ‘I officially hate’ Todd Akin</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Aug 2012 02:24:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 161907 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, Dan. I wish it was http://dagblog.com/comment/161894#comment-161894 <a id="comment-161894"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/161868#comment-161868">Yes, I think this is right on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, Dan.  I wish it was funny.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:54:16 +0000 DF comment 161894 at http://dagblog.com Guess what our insurance http://dagblog.com/comment/161879#comment-161879 <a id="comment-161879"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/embrace-war-women-win-14531">Embrace the War on Women for the Win</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Guess what our insurance company just implemented?  No copay for birth control, as required by the ACA.  Definitely a differentiator for Team Obama.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:59:41 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 161879 at http://dagblog.com Yes, I think this is right on http://dagblog.com/comment/161868#comment-161868 <a id="comment-161868"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/embrace-war-women-win-14531">Embrace the War on Women for the Win</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, I think this is right on strategy and I think the Obama campaign knows it, which is why Obama jumped so eagerly into the fray with an impromptu press conference this week following the Akin gaffe.  Obama didn't even have to say much about it - just be reasonable, correct and non-threatening.</p> <p>I suspect that Obama will also be endeavoring, in a more discreet way via surrogates, to prize even some pro-life Catholics away from Ryan, by exposing his manifest intellectual hypocrisy and dishonesty on Catholic and Christian doctrine.</p> <p>What do you get when you cross a pseudo-Catholic pro-lifer with an enthusiast for Ayn Rand's half-baked Nietzschean creed of anti-Christian domination of the weak by the strong?  A frightening blue-eyed monster of patriarchal control and vanity.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:30:05 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 161868 at http://dagblog.com