dagblog - Comments for "Romney for President" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/romney-president-14562 Comments for "Romney for President" en Georgie Porgie, Puddin' and http://dagblog.com/comment/162252#comment-162252 <a id="comment-162252"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162250#comment-162250">I was reel happy that someone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><dl><dd class="rtecenter"> <strong>Georgie Porgie, Puddin' and Pie,</strong></dd> <dd class="rtecenter"> <strong>Kissed the girls and made them cry,</strong></dd> <dd class="rtecenter"> <strong>When the boys came out to play</strong></dd> <dd class="rtecenter"> <strong>Georgie Porgie ran away.</strong></dd> </dl></div></div></div> Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:43:17 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 162252 at http://dagblog.com I needed a George, and you've http://dagblog.com/comment/162251#comment-162251 <a id="comment-162251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162250#comment-162250">I was reel happy that someone</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I needed a George, and you've already run your 2 terms. George Clooney? George Michaels? Certainly not George Stephanopoulos.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:29:07 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 162251 at http://dagblog.com I was reel happy that someone http://dagblog.com/comment/162250#comment-162250 <a id="comment-162250"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/romney-president-14562">Romney for President</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was reel happy that someone was writing a pro Romney article but, dang it, you got the wrong one. George isn't running.</p> <p>W</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:24:53 +0000 The Decider comment 162250 at http://dagblog.com Another good book to check http://dagblog.com/comment/162216#comment-162216 <a id="comment-162216"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/romney-president-14562">Romney for President</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Another good book to check out--not as good as Blowing Smoke, but still good--is Invisible Hands, by Fein.</p> <p>Really lays out the whole emergence of the conservative resurgence from the 1940s through to "today."</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:04:12 +0000 Peter Schwartz comment 162216 at http://dagblog.com Just trying to playfully go http://dagblog.com/comment/162194#comment-162194 <a id="comment-162194"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162193#comment-162193">Don&#039;t know what you&#039;re</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just trying to playfully go along with the what-if sci-fi tip you brought up, not "arguing" nor "smoking".</p> <p>Guess you really are intent on being grumpy. Never mind.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:03:14 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 162194 at http://dagblog.com Don't know what you're http://dagblog.com/comment/162193#comment-162193 <a id="comment-162193"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162190#comment-162190">Note: actually, the whales</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't know what you're smoking', but at this point enjoy arguing with yourself. Try counting to 10 (or 100) and take a deep breath. Calm down.</p> <p>Have a nice day.Later.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:57:58 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 162193 at http://dagblog.com Note: actually, the whales http://dagblog.com/comment/162190#comment-162190 <a id="comment-162190"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162187#comment-162187">Okay, I was trying to take it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Note: actually, the whales did make it off the planet, only because some passing Samaritan in a spaceship thought the "Save the Whales" t-shirts were pretty good souvenirs for his high school kids back home. Unfortunately, he had to reduce the whales down to the size of sardines to fit on the ship, but if you go visit him, you'll find he's made a whole series of albums of beautiful whale songs, which if translated from not whalese but a poor desperate heavily-accented attempt to speak Esperanto, say "get us the fuck out of here... and what's with the awful oily fish smell?"</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:47:51 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 162190 at http://dagblog.com Okay, I was trying to take it http://dagblog.com/comment/162187#comment-162187 <a id="comment-162187"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162186#comment-162186">Sigh. You are obviously</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay, I was trying to take it easy to not set off paroxysms of horror, but having Gandhi show up as a crack-smoking break dancer in Seattle wearing plaid and living on Castle "sliders" is as easy to roll off the fingers as say Rush Limbaugh getting Rachel Maddow and Jane Hamsher to agree to a threesome while singing the Internationale to the tune of "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus". Or finding out Challenger was really equipped as a Soylent Green ship, only Charlton Heston's son brought it down with a shoulder-based rocket launcher, both denying Io it's next trendy foreign food sensation, but also ensuring no escape route from global warming, so in the end we're all deep-fried anyway.</p> <p>Hey, let's start a what-if Civil War post!!! Wouldn't that be exciting!!!</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:40:25 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 162187 at http://dagblog.com Sigh. You are obviously http://dagblog.com/comment/162186#comment-162186 <a id="comment-162186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162170#comment-162170">Aha, I see, mea culpa. Yes,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sigh. You are obviously unaware the alternate history is an accepted subgroup of Science Fiction literature. Titles like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-Alternate-History-Stories-Century/dp/0345439902/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1345990007&amp;sr=1-3&amp;keywords=alternate+history">"The Best Alternate History Stories of the 20th Century"</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mammoth-Book-Alternate-Histories/dp/0762438428/ref=sr_1_10?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1345990007&amp;sr=1-10&amp;keywords=alternate+history">"The Mammoth Book of Alternate Histories"</a> are among the selections. Elvis is elected President and JFK survives the 1963 Dallas shooting in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Way-Wasnt-Science-Fiction-Alternate/dp/0806517697/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1345990631&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=The+way+it+wasn%27t">"The Way It Wasn't"</a>. You scenarios are not beyond the pale.</p> <p>I have read stories depicting Gandhi as an armed freedom fighter and MLK as the person who shot JFK because the alternate King felt Kennedy was too slow in addressing Civil a Rights issues.</p> <p>Our imaginations allow us to place historical figures in positions that agree with our hopes, or reveal how disappointed we would be in where our historical heroes wound up.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:23:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 162186 at http://dagblog.com Weyrich in particular seems http://dagblog.com/comment/162172#comment-162172 <a id="comment-162172"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162089#comment-162089">It started with two guys</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Weyrich in particular seems awful and effective. Thanks.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:29:40 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 162172 at http://dagblog.com