dagblog - Comments for "Democratic Party Platform" http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-party-platform-14655 Comments for "Democratic Party Platform" en Thanks for the suggestion. I http://dagblog.com/comment/162985#comment-162985 <a id="comment-162985"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162947#comment-162947">Emma, the NY piece is exactly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the suggestion. </p> <p>I posted the link to the NY Times articles here:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/05/us/politics/how-the-party-platforms-differ.html?_r=1">How the Party Platforms Differ By MICHAEL COOPER</a></p> <p>It includes links to both party platforms in the first paragraph.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:51:22 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 162985 at http://dagblog.com Emma, the NY piece is exactly http://dagblog.com/comment/162947#comment-162947 <a id="comment-162947"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162943#comment-162943">The problem, IMO, with this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Emma, the NY piece is exactly what is needed.  Simplistic and cites the specifics.  I only wish it was expanded to cover the other issues listed too.</p> <p>Thanks and hope you post this for others to easily access.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:13:37 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 162947 at http://dagblog.com The problem, IMO, with this http://dagblog.com/comment/162943#comment-162943 <a id="comment-162943"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162939#comment-162939">The problem, IMO, with this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.727272033691406px; line-height: 17px; "><em>The problem, IMO, with this type of article is that it is one person's opinion crafted with their own personal bias and priorities as the foundation of the revi</em>ew.</span></p> <p>Exactly right, which is why when I followed the links and saw they were HuffPo and The Nation, I delinked and went in search of the actual platform:</p> <p><a href="http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform">http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform</a></p> <p>and here is the opposition's:</p> <p><a href="http://www.gop.com/2012-republican-platform_home/">http://www.gop.com/2012-republican-platform_home/</a></p> <p>Next, I will try to find critiques by each party of the other's platform.</p> <p>In the meantime, I did find a useful identification of differences here:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/05/us/politics/how-the-party-platforms-differ.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/05/us/politics/how-the-party-platforms-differ.html?_r=1</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:48:14 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 162943 at http://dagblog.com The problem, IMO, with this http://dagblog.com/comment/162939#comment-162939 <a id="comment-162939"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/162930#comment-162930">Here&#039;s one take on it, posted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The problem, IMO, with this type of article is that it is one person's opinion crafted with their own personal bias and priorities as the foundation of the review.</p> <p>Of course, that is also true of the readers mindset when reading and commenting on this type of missive.</p> <p>However, I do think that these offerings don't serve any well and believe that better benefits would be delivered if it was written as a tutorial only without including the author's thoughts of right, wrong or indifference. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:34:56 +0000 Aunt Sam comment 162939 at http://dagblog.com Here's one take on it, posted http://dagblog.com/comment/162930#comment-162930 <a id="comment-162930"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-party-platform-14655">Democratic Party Platform</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's one take on it, posted today at The Nation by a George Zornick:</p> <p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/169714/democratic-platform-good-and-bad?rel=emailnation">http://www.thenation.com/blog/169714/democratic-platform-good-and-bad?rel=emailnation</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:55:18 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 162930 at http://dagblog.com