dagblog - Comments for "The Deafness Before the Storm" http://dagblog.com/link/deafness-storm-14741 Comments for "The Deafness Before the Storm" en Don't expect Republicans to http://dagblog.com/comment/163816#comment-163816 <a id="comment-163816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/deafness-storm-14741">The Deafness Before the Storm</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't expect Republicans to care about 'deafness before the storm'.</p> <p>To Republicans the great catastrophe of the George W. Bush administration was not the absence of any action to prevent 9/11, lying the country into the fiasco of the Iraq War, letting bin Laden slip away in 2001, watching from 20,000 feet while hundreds of Americans became alligator MRE's in NO or presiding over the economic collapse and Wall Street bailout.</p> <p>The seething anger of the 'Party Over All' GOP towards him is because the long reign of The Decider failed on the only reality they recognize and truly care about-it led to the election of the Democrat Barack Obama.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:56:09 +0000 NCD comment 163816 at http://dagblog.com Wow. Thanks for the link. I http://dagblog.com/comment/163812#comment-163812 <a id="comment-163812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/deafness-storm-14741">The Deafness Before the Storm</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow.  Thanks for the link.</p> <p>I thought this paragraph was especially interesting--and damning:</p> <blockquote> <p itemprop="articleBody">But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster. An intelligence official and a member of the Bush administration both told me in interviews that the neoconservative leaders who had recently assumed power at the Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; according to this theory, Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, whom the neoconservatives saw as a greater threat.<strong> </strong>Intelligence officials, these sources said, protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives’ suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day.</p> </blockquote> <p itemprop="articleBody">What this information seems to establish beyond further doubt is that the Bush/Cheney/Rice/Wolfowitz crowd dropped the ball on AQ by failing to give the threat reports anything resembling the urgent attention they surely merited.  Richard Clarke and the departing Clinton Administration had beseeched them to treat AQ with the utmost seriousness and sense of urgency. </p> <p itemprop="articleBody">Assertions by these individuals that they, and their party alone, are the ones who really know how to protect, and did a great job of protecting, our country are powerful and tragic examples of the human capacity for denial and self-delusion and the great harm these can lead to.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:29:28 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 163812 at http://dagblog.com